Literature DB >> 33924416

In Vitro Efficacy of Bacterial Cellulose Dressings Chemisorbed with Antiseptics against Biofilm Formed by Pathogens Isolated from Chronic Wounds.

Karolina Dydak1, Adam Junka1, Agata Dydak2, Malwina Brożyna1, Justyna Paleczny1, Karol Fijalkowski3, Grzegorz Kubielas4, Olga Aniołek5, Marzenna Bartoszewicz1.   

Abstract

Local administration of antiseptics is required to prevent and fight against biofilm-based infections of chronic wounds. One of the methods used for delivering antiseptics to infected wounds is the application of dressings chemisorbed with antimicrobials. Dressings made of bacterial cellulose (BC) display several features, making them suitable for such a purpose. This work aimed to compare the activity of commonly used antiseptic molecules: octenidine, polyhexanide, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, ethacridine lactate, and hypochlorous solutions and to evaluate their usefulness as active substances of BC dressings against 48 bacterial strains (8 species) and 6 yeast strains (1 species). A silver dressing was applied as a control material of proven antimicrobial activity. The methodology applied included the assessment of minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC), the modified disc-diffusion method, and the modified antibiofilm dressing activity measurement (A.D.A.M.) method. While in 96-well plate-based methods (MIC and MBEC assessment), the highest antimicrobial activity was recorded for chlorhexidine, in the modified disc-diffusion method and in the modified A.D.A.M test, povidone-iodine performed the best. In an in vitro setting simulating chronic wound conditions, BC dressings chemisorbed with polyhexanide, octenidine, or povidone-iodine displayed a similar or even higher antibiofilm activity than the control dressing containing silver molecules. If translated into clinical conditions, the obtained results suggest high applicability of BC dressings chemisorbed with antiseptics to eradicate biofilm from chronic wounds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antiseptics; bacterial cellulose; chronic wounds; dressing

Year:  2021        PMID: 33924416     DOI: 10.3390/ijms22083996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


  5 in total

1.  Topical Film-Forming Chlorhexidine Gluconate Sprays for Antiseptic Application.

Authors:  Benchawan Chamsai; Sirima Soodvilai; Praneet Opanasopit; Wipada Samprasit
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.525

2.  In Vitro Cytotoxicity, Colonisation by Fibroblasts and Antimicrobial Properties of Surgical Meshes Coated with Bacterial Cellulose.

Authors:  Karolina Dydak; Adam Junka; Grzegorz Nowacki; Justyna Paleczny; Patrycja Szymczyk-Ziółkowska; Aleksandra Górzyńska; Olga Aniołek; Marzenna Bartoszewicz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  A New Source of Diterpene Lactones From Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Nees-Two Endophytic Fungi of Colletotrichum sp. With Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities.

Authors:  Na Li; Dan Xu; Rui-Hua Huang; Jian-Yun Zheng; You-Yan Liu; Bin-Sheng Hu; Yuan-Qin Gu; Qin Du
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Microbial Biofilms and Antibiofilm Agents 2.0.

Authors:  Giovanna Batoni; Giuseppantonio Maisetta; Semih Esin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Assessment of Bacterial Nanocellulose Loaded with Acetylsalicylic Acid or Povidone-Iodine as Bioactive Dressings for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.

Authors:  Shaydier Argel; Melissa Castaño; Daiver Estiven Jimenez; Sebastian Rodríguez; Maria Jose Vallejo; Cristina Isabel Castro; Marlon Andres Osorio
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 6.525

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.