| Literature DB >> 33924150 |
Xianyu Liu1, Liwen Ma2, Yehong Du2, Qiongqiong Lu3, Aikai Yang4, Xinyu Wang2.
Abstract
Aqueous zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) with the characteristics of low production costs and good safety have been regarded as ideal candidates for large-scale energy storage applications. However, the nonconductive and non-redox active polymer used as the binder in the traditional preparation of electrodes hinders the exposure of active sites and limits the diffusion of ions, compromising the energy density of the electrode in ZIBs. Herein, we fabricated vanadium pentoxide nanofibers/carbon nanotubes (V2O5/CNTs) hybrid films as binder-free cathodes for ZIBs. High ionic conductivity and electronic conductivity were enabled in the V2O5/CNTs film due to the porous structure of the film and the introduction of carbon nanotubes with high electronic conductivity. As a result, the batteries based on the V2O5/CNTs film exhibited a higher capacity of 390 mAh g-1 at 1 A g-1, as compared to batteries based on V2O5 (263 mAh g-1). Even at 5 A g-1, the battery based on the V2O5/CNTs film maintained a capacity of 250 mAh g-1 after 2000 cycles with a capacity retention of 94%. In addition, the V2O5/CNTs film electrode also showed a high energy/power density (e.g., 67 kW kg-1/267 Wh kg-1). The capacitance response and rapid diffusion coefficient of Zn2+ (~10-8 cm-2 s-1) can explain the excellent rate capability of V2O5/CNTs. The vanadium pentoxide nanofibers/carbon nanotubes hybrid film as binder-free cathodes showed a high capability and a stable cyclability, demonstrating that it is highly promising for large-scale energy storage applications.Entities:
Keywords: aqueous zinc-ion battery; carbon nanotubes; hybrid film; vanadium pentoxide
Year: 2021 PMID: 33924150 PMCID: PMC8074388 DOI: 10.3390/nano11041054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a) TEM image of the V2O5 nanofibers. (b) SEM image of V2O5 nanofibers. (c) SEM image and optical image (inset) of V2O5/CNTs films. (d) Element mappings of V2O5/CNTs.
Figure 2(a) XRD patterns of V2O5 and V2O5/CNTs. (b) Raman spectra of the V2O5 and V2O5/CNTs. (c) XPS spectra of V2O5/CNTs and (d) V 2p spectrum. (e) Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms.
Figure 3(a) The rate performance of the V2O5/CNTs film and V2O5 electrodes. (b) Charge/discharge curves of the V2O5/CNTs film and V2O5 electrodes at different current densities. (c) Cycle performance of V2O5/CNTs film and V2O5 electrodes. (d) Long-term cycling performance of V2O5/CNTs film and V2O5 electrodes at 5 A g−1. (e) Nyquist plots of V2O5/CNTs film and V2O5 electrodes.
The comparison of long-term cycle performances of the V2O5/CNTs cathode.
| Cathodes | Rate | Capacity Retention | Final Capacity | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V2O5/CNTs | 5 | 94% (2000 cycles) | 251 | This work |
| V2O5·nH2O | 6 | 71.0% (900 cycles) | 213 | [ |
| Cu2+-V2O5 | 10 | 88.0% (5000 cycles) | 180 | [ |
| K+-V2O5 | 8 | 96.0% (1500 cycles) | 172 | [ |
| Graphene/H2V3O8 | 6 | 87.0% (2000 cycles) | 240 | [ |
| V2O5@PANI | 5 | 93.8% (1000 cycles) | 201 | [ |
| 2D V2O5 | 20 | 68.2% (500 cycles) | 117 | [ |
| Zn0.25V2O5·nH2O | 2.4 | 80.0% (1000 cycles) | 208 | [ |
| NaV3O8·1.5H2O | 4 | 82.0% (1000 cycles) | 120 | [ |
| Na2V6O16·3H2O | 14 | 85% (1000 cycles) | 129 | [ |
| K2V6O16·2.7H2O | 5 | 88% (229 cycles) | 139 | [ |
| Na1.1V3O7.9/rGO | 1 | 93% (500 cycles) | 85 | [ |
The comparison of the V2O5/CNTs cathode with other CNT-based V2O5 electrodes.
| Cathodes | Specific Capacity | Capacity Retention | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| V2O5/CNTs | 399 mAh g−1 (0.1 A g−1) | 5A g−1: | This work |
| V2O5/CNTs nanopaper | 375 mAh g−1 (0.5 A g−1) | 10A g−1: | [ |
| V2O5/CNTs (VCP) | 312 mAh g−1 (1 A g−1) | 1 A g−1: | [ |
| V2O5@CNTs | 293 mAh g−1 (0.3 A g−1) | 5 A g−1: | [ |
Figure 4Ragone plot of the batteries based on V2O5/CNTs compared with oher reported data for ZIBs.
Figure 5(a) CV curves of the V2O5/CNTs electrode at different scan rates. (b) Log(current) vs. log (scan rate) plots of four peaks in the CV curves. (c) Capacity separation curves at 0.5 mV·s−1. (d) Capacity contribution ratios at multiple scan rates.
The proportions of the capacitive contribution for the V2O5/CNTs cathode.
| Scan rate (mV s−1) | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacitive contribution (%) | 52.8 | 59.6 | 64.0 | 66.3 | 68.3 | 70.0 | 71.6 | 73.7 |
Figure 6(a) GITT measurements and (b) the corresponding Zn2+ diffusion coefficients of V2O5/CNTs and V2O5 in the discharge process.