Laurène Salesse1, Cécily Lucas1, My Hanh Thi Hoang1,2, Pierre Sauvanet1,3, Alexandra Rezard1, Philip Rosenstiel4, Christelle Damon-Soubeyrand5, Nicolas Barnich1, Catherine Godfraind1,6, Guillaume Dalmasso1, Hang Thi Thu Nguyen1. 1. M2iSH, UMR 1071 Inserm, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE USC 2018, CRNH, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France. 2. Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Science, Vietnam National University (VNU), Hanoi 100000, Vietnam. 3. Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, CHU Estaing, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France. 4. Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24148 Kiel, Germany. 5. GReD, CNRS UMR 6293 INSERM U110, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France. 6. Department of Pathology, CHU Gabriel Montpied, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli producing the genotoxin colibactin (CoPEC or colibactin-producing E. coli) abnormally colonize the colonic mucosa of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We previously showed that deficiency of autophagy in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) enhances CoPEC-induced colorectal carcinogenesis in ApcMin/+ mice. Here, we tested if CoPEC trigger tumorigenesis in a mouse model lacking genetic susceptibility or the use of carcinogen. METHODS: Mice with autophagy deficiency in IECs (Atg16l1∆IEC) or wild-type mice (Atg16l1flox/flox) were infected with the CoPEC 11G5 strain or the mutant 11G5∆clbQ incapable of producing colibactin and subjected to 12 cycles of DSS treatment to induce chronic colitis. Mouse colons were used for histological assessment, immunohistochemical and immunoblot analyses for DNA damage marker. Results: 11G5 or 11G5∆clbQ infection increased clinical and histological inflammation scores, and these were further enhanced by IEC-specific autophagy deficiency. 11G5 infection, but not 11G5∆clbQ infection, triggered the formation of invasive carcinomas, and this was further increased by autophagy deficiency. The increase in invasive carcinomas was correlated with enhanced DNA damage and independent of inflammation. Conclusions: CoPEC induce colorectal carcinogenesis in a CRC mouse model lacking genetic susceptibility and carcinogen. This work highlights the role of (i) CoPEC as a driver of CRC development, and (ii) autophagy in inhibiting the carcinogenic properties of CoPEC.
BACKGROUND:Escherichia coli producing the genotoxin colibactin (CoPEC or colibactin-producing E. coli) abnormally colonize the colonic mucosa of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We previously showed that deficiency of autophagy in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) enhances CoPEC-induced colorectal carcinogenesis in ApcMin/+ mice. Here, we tested if CoPEC trigger tumorigenesis in a mouse model lacking genetic susceptibility or the use of carcinogen. METHODS:Mice with autophagy deficiency in IECs (Atg16l1∆IEC) or wild-type mice (Atg16l1flox/flox) were infected with the CoPEC 11G5 strain or the mutant 11G5∆clbQ incapable of producing colibactin and subjected to 12 cycles of DSS treatment to induce chronic colitis. Mouse colons were used for histological assessment, immunohistochemical and immunoblot analyses for DNA damage marker. Results: 11G5 or 11G5∆clbQ infection increased clinical and histological inflammation scores, and these were further enhanced by IEC-specific autophagy deficiency. 11G5 infection, but not 11G5∆clbQ infection, triggered the formation of invasive carcinomas, and this was further increased by autophagy deficiency. The increase in invasive carcinomas was correlated with enhanced DNA damage and independent of inflammation. Conclusions: CoPEC induce colorectal carcinogenesis in a CRC mouse model lacking genetic susceptibility and carcinogen. This work highlights the role of (i) CoPEC as a driver of CRC development, and (ii) autophagy in inhibiting the carcinogenic properties of CoPEC.
Entities:
Keywords:
autophagy; colibactin-producing E. coli; colorectal cancer; microbiota; toxin
Authors: Sarah Tomkovich; Ye Yang; Kathryn Winglee; Josee Gauthier; Marcus Mühlbauer; Xiaolun Sun; Mansour Mohamadzadeh; Xiuli Liu; Patricia Martin; Gary P Wang; Eric Oswald; Anthony A Fodor; Christian Jobin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Koichiro Haruki; Keisuke Kosumi; Tsuyoshi Hamada; Tyler S Twombly; Juha P Väyrynen; Sun A Kim; Yohei Masugi; Zhi Rong Qian; Kosuke Mima; Yoshifumi Baba; Annacarolina da Silva; Jennifer Borowsky; Kota Arima; Kenji Fujiyoshi; Mai Chan Lau; Peilong Li; Chunguang Guo; Yang Chen; Mingyang Song; Jonathan A Nowak; Reiko Nishihara; Katsuhiko Yanaga; Xuehong Zhang; Kana Wu; Susan Bullman; Wendy S Garrett; Curtis Huttenhower; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Marios Giannakis; Andrew T Chan; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino Journal: J Pathol Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Andrew Maltez Thomas; Paolo Manghi; Francesco Asnicar; Edoardo Pasolli; Federica Armanini; Moreno Zolfo; Francesco Beghini; Serena Manara; Nicolai Karcher; Chiara Pozzi; Sara Gandini; Davide Serrano; Sonia Tarallo; Antonio Francavilla; Gaetano Gallo; Mario Trompetto; Giulio Ferrero; Sayaka Mizutani; Hirotsugu Shiroma; Satoshi Shiba; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Shinichi Yachida; Takuji Yamada; Jakob Wirbel; Petra Schrotz-King; Cornelia M Ulrich; Hermann Brenner; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Peer Bork; Georg Zeller; Francesca Cordero; Emmanuel Dias-Neto; João Carlos Setubal; Adrian Tett; Barbara Pardini; Maria Rescigno; Levi Waldron; Alessio Naccarati; Nicola Segata Journal: Nat Med Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 87.241
Authors: Manita Guragain; John W Schmidt; Norasak Kalchayanand; Aaron M Dickey; Joseph M Bosilevac Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 4.996