Literature DB >> 33923135

Evaluation of Patients' Perception of Safety in an Italian Hospital Using the PMOS-30 Questionnaire.

Sara Schiavone1, Angela Annecchiarico2, Danilo Lisi2, Mario Massimo Mensorio2, Francesco Attena1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In our study, an Italian version of the PMOS-30 questionnaire was used to evaluate its feasibility and to improve health care quality in an Italian hospital.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 435 inpatients at a hospital in the Campania Region of Southern Italy using the PMOS-30 questionnaire and two other questions to assess patient feedback about the overall perception of safety.
RESULTS: The item "I was always treated with dignity and respect" showed the greatest percentage of agreement (agree/strongly agree = 89.2%; mean = 4.24). The least agreement was associated with the four "Staff Roles and Responsibilities" items (agree/strongly agree ranged from 31.5 to 40.0%; weighted mean = 2.84). All other 25 items had over 55.0% agreement, with 19 items over 70%. Moreover, 94.5% of the patients considered the safety of the ward sufficient/good/very good, and 92.8% did not notice situations that could cause harm to patients.
CONCLUSION: Patient perception of safety was found to be satisfactory. The results were presented to the hospital decision makers for suggesting appropriate interventions. Our experience showed that the use of the PMOS-30 questionnaire may improve safety and health care quality in hospital settings through patient feedback.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PMOS-30; feasibility; hospital; patient feedback; patient safety; questionnaire

Year:  2021        PMID: 33923135     DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  17 in total

Review 1.  Quality assurance of medical care.

Authors:  N Black
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1990

2.  The seven pillars of quality.

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  The identification and measurement of quality dimensions in health care: focus group interview results.

Authors:  M Jun; R T Peterson; G A Zsidisin
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  1998

4.  The Ljubljana Charter on reforming health care.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-29

5.  Quality assessment in health.

Authors:  R J Maxwell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-05-12

6.  Patients' attitudes towards patient involvement in safety interventions: results of two exploratory studies.

Authors:  Rachel E Davis; Nick Sevdalis; Anna Pinto; Ara Darzi; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Quality of care from the patients' perspective: from theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument.

Authors:  Herman J. Sixma; Jan J. Kerssens; Crétien Van Campen; Loe Peters
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Developing a patient measure of safety (PMOS).

Authors:  Sally J Giles; Rebecca J Lawton; Ikhlaq Din; Rosemary R C McEachan
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  Patient involvement in patient safety: Protocol for developing an intervention using patient reports of organisational safety and patient incident reporting.

Authors:  Jane K Ward; Rosemary R C McEachan; Rebecca Lawton; Gerry Armitage; Ian Watt; John Wright
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Developing a reliable and valid patient measure of safety in hospitals (PMOS): a validation study.

Authors:  Rosemary R C McEachan; Rebecca J Lawton; Jane K O'Hara; Gerry Armitage; Sally Giles; Sahdia Parveen; Ian S Watt; John Wright
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.