Literature DB >> 33922368

Modified Rio Score with Platform Therapy Predicts Treatment Success with Fingolimod and Natalizumab in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

Anna Jamroz-Wiśniewska1, Radosław Zajdel2, Agnieszka Słowik3, Monika Marona3, Marcin Wnuk3, Monika Adamczyk-Sowa4, Bożena Adamczyk4, Anetta Lasek-Bal5, Przemysław Puz5, Arkadiusz Stęposz5, Ewa Krzystanek6, Maja Patalong-Ogiewa7, Anna Pokryszko-Dragan8, Sławomir Budrewicz8, Dorota Koziarska9, Anna Karbicka10, Sławomir Wawrzyniak11, Waldemar Fryze12, Marzena Furtak-Niczyporuk13, Konrad Rejdak1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reliable markers of disease outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS) would help to predict the response to treatment in patients treated with high efficacy drugs. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) has become a treatment goal whereas the modified Rio score (MRS) predicts future suboptimal responders to treatment. The aim of our study was to identify factors that would predict poor response to treatment with natalizumab and fingolimod.
METHODS: In the multicenter prospective trial, 336 subjects were enrolled, initiating therapy with natalizumab (n = 135) or fingolimod (n = 201). Data on relapse rate, the expanded disability status scale, and MRI results were collected, and MRS was estimated.
RESULTS: NEDA-3 after the first year of therapy was 73.9% for natalizumab and 54.8% for fingolimod (p < 0.0001). Patients with MRS = 0 in the last year on platform therapy had the best NEDA-3 (71%) and patients with MRS = 3 had the worst NEDA-3 (41%) in the first year of treatment with the second-line therapy.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that switching to the second-line therapy should occur earlier to enable better results for patients treated with natalizumab or fingolimod. The outcome on both drugs is better with better neurological conditions and lower MRS of the patient on the platform therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fingolimod; modified Rio score (MRS); natalizumab; no evidence of disease activity (NEDA); relapsing-remitting type of multiple sclerosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33922368     DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  18 in total

1.  After the storm: neurofilament levels as a surrogate endpoint for neuroaxonal damage.

Authors:  Gavin Giovannoni; Avindra Nath
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (FREEDOMS II): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Peter A Calabresi; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Douglas Goodin; Douglas Jeffery; Kottil W Rammohan; Anthony T Reder; Timothy Vollmer; Mark A Agius; Ludwig Kappos; Tracy Stites; Bingbing Li; Linda Cappiello; Philipp von Rosenstiel; Fred D Lublin
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 44.182

3.  The real-world effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. An Italian multicentre study.

Authors:  Erica Curti; Elena Tsantes; Eleonora Baldi; Luisa Maria Caniatti; Diana Ferraro; Patrizia Sola; Franco Granella
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Natalizumab versus fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis non-responding to first-line injectable therapies.

Authors:  Damiano Baroncini; Angelo Ghezzi; Pietro O Annovazzi; Bruno Colombo; Vittorio Martinelli; Giorgio Minonzio; Lucia Moiola; Mariaemma Rodegher; Mauro Zaffaroni; Giancarlo Comi
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  Effect of natalizumab on clinical and radiological disease activity in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of the Natalizumab Safety and Efficacy in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (AFFIRM) study.

Authors:  Eva Havrdova; Steven Galetta; Michael Hutchinson; Dusan Stefoski; David Bates; Chris H Polman; Paul W O'Connor; Gavin Giovannoni; J Theodore Phillips; Fred D Lublin; Amy Pace; Richard Kim; Robert Hyde
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 44.182

6.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria.

Authors:  Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Brenda Banwell; Michel Clanet; Jeffrey A Cohen; Massimo Filippi; Kazuo Fujihara; Eva Havrdova; Michael Hutchinson; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Xavier Montalban; Paul O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 7.  The sequence of disease-modifying therapies in relapsing multiple sclerosis: safety and immunologic considerations.

Authors:  Gabriel Pardo; David E Jones
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Inflammatory Activity on Natalizumab Predicts Short-Term but Not Long-Term Disability in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Joel Raffel; Arie R Gafson; Samer Dahdaleh; Omar Malik; Brynmor Jones; Richard Nicholas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of Natalizumab and Fingolimod on Clinical, Cognitive, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Paolo Preziosa; Maria A Rocca; Gianna C Riccitelli; Lucia Moiola; Loredana Storelli; Mariaemma Rodegher; Giancarlo Comi; Alessio Signori; Andrea Falini; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 7.620

10.  NEDA-3 status including cortical lesions in the comparative evaluation of natalizumab versus fingolimod efficacy in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Marco Puthenparampil; Chiara Cazzola; Sofia Zywicki; Lisa Federle; Erica Stropparo; Mariagiulia Anglani; Francesca Rinaldi; Paola Perini; Paolo Gallo
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.570

View more
  1 in total

1.  The safety and efficacy of fingolimod: Real-world data from a long-term, non-interventional study on the treatment of RRMS patients spanning up to 5 years from Hungary.

Authors:  Tamás Biernacki; Dániel Sandi; Judit Füvesi; Zsanett Fricska-Nagy; Tamás Zsigmond Kincses; Péter Ács; Csilla Rózsa; Enikő Dobos; Botond Cseh; László Horváth; Zsuzsanna Nagy; Attila Csányi; Krisztina Kovács; Tünde Csépány; László Vécsei; Krisztina Bencsik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.