Literature DB >> 33922356

Towards the Interpretability of Machine Learning Predictions for Medical Applications Targeting Personalised Therapies: A Cancer Case Survey.

Antonio Jesús Banegas-Luna1, Jorge Peña-García1, Adrian Iftene2, Fiorella Guadagni3,4, Patrizia Ferroni3,4, Noemi Scarpato4, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto5, Andrés Bueno-Crespo1, Horacio Pérez-Sánchez1.   

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence is providing astonishing results, with medicine being one of its favourite playgrounds. Machine Learning and, in particular, Deep Neural Networks are behind this revolution. Among the most challenging targets of interest in medicine are cancer diagnosis and therapies but, to start this revolution, software tools need to be adapted to cover the new requirements. In this sense, learning tools are becoming a commodity but, to be able to assist doctors on a daily basis, it is essential to fully understand how models can be interpreted. In this survey, we analyse current machine learning models and other in-silico tools as applied to medicine-specifically, to cancer research-and we discuss their interpretability, performance and the input data they are fed with. Artificial neural networks (ANN), logistic regression (LR) and support vector machines (SVM) have been observed to be the preferred models. In addition, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), supported by the rapid development of graphic processing units (GPUs) and high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructures, are gaining importance when image processing is feasible. However, the interpretability of machine learning predictions so that doctors can understand them, trust them and gain useful insights for the clinical practice is still rarely considered, which is a factor that needs to be improved to enhance doctors' predictive capacity and achieve individualised therapies in the near future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer treatment; deep learning; drug repurposing; high performance computing; machine learning; personalised therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33922356     DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


  105 in total

1.  Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods.

Authors:  Dursun Delen; Glenn Walker; Amit Kadam
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  Predicting the prognosis of breast cancer by integrating clinical and microarray data with Bayesian networks.

Authors:  Olivier Gevaert; Frank De Smet; Dirk Timmerman; Yves Moreau; Bart De Moor
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Multiparametric decision support system for the prediction of oral cancer reoccurrence.

Authors:  Konstantinos P Exarchos; Yorgos Goletsis; Dimitrios I Fotiadis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2011-08-18

4.  A new disease-specific machine learning approach for the prediction of cancer-causing missense variants.

Authors:  Emidio Capriotti; Russ B Altman
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 5.  Early Detection and Screening for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Cathy Coleman
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 6.  Delivering intensive therapies to older adults with hematologic malignancies: strategies to personalize care.

Authors:  Rebecca L Olin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Prediction of nodal spread of breast cancer by using artificial neural network-based analyses of S100A4, nm23 and steroid receptor expression.

Authors:  S R Grey; S S Dlay; B E Leone; F Cajone; G V Sherbet
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.150

8.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutations and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mok Oh; Ali McBride; Seongseok Yun; Sandipan Bhattacharjee; Marion Slack; Jennifer R Martin; Joanne Jeter; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Combination therapy in combating cancer.

Authors:  Reza Bayat Mokhtari; Tina S Homayouni; Narges Baluch; Evgeniya Morgatskaya; Sushil Kumar; Bikul Das; Herman Yeger
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-06

10.  FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Dongliang Fu; Xiangxing Kong; Zhiheng Huang; Maxwell Hwang; Yingshuang Zhu; Liubo Chen; Kai Jiang; Xinlin Li; Yihua Wu; Jun Li; Ying Yuan; Kefeng Ding
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  8 in total

1.  Editorial of Special Issue "Deep Learning and Machine Learning in Bioinformatics".

Authors:  Mingon Kang; Jung Hun Oh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review.

Authors:  Haomin Chen; Catalina Gomez; Chien-Ming Huang; Mathias Unberath
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-10-19

3.  Vitamin D Deficiency in Women with Breast Cancer: A Correlation with Osteoporosis? A Machine Learning Approach with Multiple Factor Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro de Sire; Luca Gallelli; Nicola Marotta; Lorenzo Lippi; Nicola Fusco; Dario Calafiore; Erika Cione; Lucia Muraca; Antonio Maconi; Giovambattista De Sarro; Antonio Ammendolia; Marco Invernizzi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 6.706

4.  Interpretable Model Based on Pyramid Scene Parsing Features for Brain Tumor MRI Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Mingyang Zhao; Junchang Xin; Zhongyang Wang; Xinlei Wang; Zhiqiong Wang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 5.  Management of Medico-Legal Risks in Digital Health Era: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Antonio Oliva; Simone Grassi; Giuseppe Vetrugno; Riccardo Rossi; Gabriele Della Morte; Vilma Pinchi; Matteo Caputo
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-11

6.  Explainable artificial intelligence based on feature optimization for age at onset prediction of spinocerebellar ataxia type 3.

Authors:  Danlei Ru; Jinchen Li; Ouyi Xie; Linliu Peng; Hong Jiang; Rong Qiu
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  Transformer for Gene Expression Modeling (T-GEM): An Interpretable Deep Learning Model for Gene Expression-Based Phenotype Predictions.

Authors:  Ting-He Zhang; Md Musaddaqul Hasib; Yu-Chiao Chiu; Zhi-Feng Han; Yu-Fang Jin; Mario Flores; Yidong Chen; Yufei Huang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 8.  Use of Personalized Biomarkers in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and the Impact of AI.

Authors:  Simona-Ruxandra Volovat; Iolanda Augustin; Daniela Zob; Diana Boboc; Florin Amurariti; Constantin Volovat; Cipriana Stefanescu; Cati Raluca Stolniceanu; Manuela Ciocoiu; Eduard Alexandru Dumitras; Mihai Danciu; Delia Gabriela Ciobanu Apostol; Vasile Drug; Sinziana Al Shurbaji; Lucia-Georgiana Coca; Florin Leon; Adrian Iftene; Paul-Corneliu Herghelegiu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 6.575

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.