| Literature DB >> 33921954 |
Jauhar Ali1, Katrina Leslie C Nicolas1, Shahana Akther2, Azerkhsh Torabi3, Ali Akbar Ebadi3, Corinne M Marfori-Nazarea1, Anumalla Mahender1.
Abstract
Anther culture technique is the most viable and efficient method of producing homozygous doubled haploid plants within a short period. However, the practical application of this technology in rice improvement is still limited by various factors that influence culture efficiency. The present study was conducted to determine the effects of two improved anther culture media, Ali-1 (A1) and Ali-2 (A2), a modified N6 medium, to enhance the callus formation and plant regeneration of japonica, indica, and hybrids of indica and japonica cross. The current study demonstrated that genotype and media had a significant impact (p < 0.001) on both callus induction frequency and green plantlet regeneration efficiency. The use of the A1 and A2 medium significantly enhanced callus induction frequency of japonica rice type, Nipponbare, and the hybrids of indica × japonica cross (CXY6, CXY24, and Y2) but not the indica rice type, NSIC Rc480. However, the A1 medium is found superior to the N6 medium as it significantly improved the green plantlet regeneration efficiency of CXY6, CXY24, and Y2 by almost 36%, 118%, and 277%, respectively. Furthermore, it substantially reduced the albino plantlet regeneration of the induced callus in two hybrids (CXY6 and Y2). Therefore, the improved anther culture medium A1 can produce doubled haploid rice plants for indica × japonica, which can be useful in different breeding programs that will enable the speedy development of rice varieties for resource-poor farmers.Entities:
Keywords: anther culture; callus induction; media components; plant regeneration; rice hybrids
Year: 2021 PMID: 33921954 PMCID: PMC8143452 DOI: 10.3390/plants10050839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Nutrient composition of four callus induction media used for the study.
| Chemicals | Concentration (mg L−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L8 | N6 | Ali-1 (A1) | Ali-2 (A2) | |
| Macronutrients | ||||
| MgSO4·7H2O | 185.00 | 185.00 | 185.00 | 200.00 * |
| KH2PO4 | 540.00 | 400.00 | 400.00 | 500.00 * |
| KNO3 | 3000.00 | 2830.00 | 2830.00 | 3000.00 * |
| CaCl2·2H2O | 150.00 | 166.00 | 166.00 | 150.00 * |
| (NH4)2SO4 | - | 463.00 | 463.00 | 300.00 * |
| Micronutrients | ||||
| H3BO3 | 6.00 | 1.60 | 1.60 | 2.00 * |
| MnSO4·4H2O | 17.98 | 4.40 | 4.40 | 5.00 * |
| ZnSO4·7H2O | 10.00 | 1.85 | 1.50 * | 3.00 * |
| Na2MoO4·2H2O | 0.250 | - | - | 0.250 # |
| CuSO4·5H2O | 0.025 | - | - | 0.025 # |
| CoCl2·6H2O | 0.025 | - | - | 0.025 # |
| KI | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.83 * |
| FeSO4·7H2O | 27.85 | 27.80 | 27.80 | 43.00 * |
| Na2EDTA·2H2O | 37.25 | 37.30 | 37.30 | 56.00 * |
| AgNO3 | - | - | - | 10.00 # |
| Vitamins | ||||
| Nicotinic acid | 3.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 2.00 * |
| Thiamine HCl | 2.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 4.00 * |
| Pyridoxine HCl | 5.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 2.00 |
| Myo-inositol | 100.00 | - | 100.00 # | 100.00 # |
| Others | ||||
| Sucrose | 50,000.00 | 60,000.00 | 30,000.00 * | 10,000.00 * |
| Sorbitol | - | - | 10,000.00 # | |
| Maltose | - | - | 30,000.00 # | 40,000.00 # |
| Glycine | - | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Phytagel | 8000.00 | 2000.00 | 2000.00 | 2000.00 |
| YE | - | - | - | 1000.00 # |
| Lactalbumin hydrolysate | 300.00 | - | - | - |
| Phytohormones | ||||
| 2,4-D | 0.50 | 2.00 | 1.00 * | 1.00 * |
| NAA | 3.50 | - | 1.00 # | 1.00 # |
| Kinetin | 2.00 | - | - | |
| Zeatin | - | - | 0.10 # | 0.10 # |
| pH | 5.80 | 5.80 | 5.80 | 5.80 |
* Chemical modified from N6 media; # Addition to N6 media components.
Figure 1Depicted diagram of the generation of DH plants. (a) Boot collections; (b) Selection of spikelets at the proper stage; (c) Cutting the base of the floret and anther inoculation process; (d) Plated anther incubated at 25 °C for 6–7 weeks for callus induction; (e) Examination of the anther plates at weekly interval for anther response and callus formation; (f) Calculation of callus induction frequency; (g) Callus proliferation; (h,i) Green plantlet regeneration in the regeneration medium; (j) Vigorous growing green plantlets in the test tube containing MS medium and incubated at 30 °C under 24 h light; (k,l) Regenerated green plantlets transferred to hydroponic nutrient solution and grown in the greenhouse at 29–30 °C temperature for two weeks; (m–o) Individual plants originating from single callus transplanted in pot condition; (p) Difference between haploid (right) and diploid (left) rice plants.
Two-way ANOVA for effects of media and genotype on callus induction.
| S. no | Sources of Variation | Degrees of Freedom | Sum of Squares | Mean Square |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Genotype | 4 | 11,443 | 2861 *** |
| 2 | Media | 3 | 12,779 | 4260 *** |
| 3 | Genotype x media | 12 | 5395 | 450 *** |
| 4 | Residuals | 80 | 2497 | 31 |
*** Significant at the 0.001 probability level.
Figure 2Callus induction frequency (CIF), green plantlet regeneration (RGP), and albino plantlet regeneration (PAP) of different genotypes in the tested media. (A) Comparison of callus induction frequency (CIF) of different genotypes incubated in the test media. (B) Comparison of green plantlet regeneration (RGP) of hybrids of indica × japonica incubated in the test media. (C) Comparison of the albino plantlet regeneration (PAP) of hybrids of indica × japonica incubated in the test media. The data presented are means of five replicates, and error bars represent SD. Values with different letter (a,b,c,d) per genotype are significantly different (Tukey HSD Test, p < 0.05, n = 5 replicates).
Figure 3Plant regeneration efficiency of the different hybrids incubated in the test media. (A) Comparison of the green plantlet regeneration efficiency (RGPE) of 100 anthers from the hybrids of indica × japonica incubated on the tested media. (B) Comparison of the albino plantlet regeneration efficiency (PAPE) of the 100 anthers from the hybrids of indica × japonica incubated on the test media. The data presented are means of five replicates, and error bars represent SD. Values with different letter (a,b,c,d) per genotype are significantly different (Tukey HSD Test, p < 0.05, n = 5 replicates).