Literature DB >> 33921762

Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors for Treatment-Naïve ALK-Positive Lung Cancer.

Cheng-Hao Chuang1, Hsiao-Ling Chen2, Hsiu-Mei Chang2, Yu-Chen Tsai1, Kuan-Li Wu1, I-Hua Chen3, Kung-Chao Chen3, Jui-Ying Lee4, Yong-Chieh Chang2, Chin-Ling Chen5, Yu-Kang Tu6,7, Jen-Yu Hung1,5,8, Chih-Jen Yang1,8,9,10, Inn-Wen Chong1,8,10.   

Abstract

Several anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors (ALKIs) have demonstrated excellent efficacy on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and also better adverse effect (AE) profiles compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy in advanced stage anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We conducted this systematic review and network meta-analysis to provide a ranking of ALKIs for treatment-naïve ALK-positive patients in terms of PFS, ORR, and AEs. In addition, a sub-group analysis of treatment benefits in patients with baseline brain metastasis was also conducted. Contrast-based analysis was performed for multiple treatment comparisons with the restricted maximum likelihood approach. Treatment rank was estimated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), as well as the probability of being the best (Prbest) reference. All next-generation ALKIs were superior to crizotinib in PFS but lorlatinib and brigatinib had increased AEs. The probability of lorlatinib being ranked first among all treatment arms was highest (SUCRA = 93.3%, Prbest = 71.8%), although there were no significant differences in pairwise comparisons with high- (600 mg twice daily) and low- (300 mg twice daily) dose alectinib. In subgroup analysis of patients with baseline brain metastasis, low-dose alectinib had the best PFS (SUCRA = 87.3%, Prbest = 74.9%). Lorlatinib was associated with the best ranking for ORR (SUCRA = 90.3%, Prbest = 71.3%), although there were no significant differences in pairwise comparisons with the other ALKIs. In addition, low-dose alectinib had the best safety performance (SUCRA = 99.4%, Prbest = 97.9%). Lorlatinib and low-dose alectinib had the best PFS and ORR in the overall population and baseline brain metastasis subgroup, respectively. Low-dose alectinib had the lowest AE risk among the available ALKIs. Further head-to-head large-scale phase III RCTs are needed to verify our conclusions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALK inhibitor; alectinib; brigatinib; ceritinib; crizotinib; ensartinib; lorlatinib; network meta-analysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33921762     DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  9 in total

1.  Beyond Crizotinib: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Next-Generation ALK Inhibitors as First-Line Treatment for ALK-Translocated Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Emilio Francesco Giunta; Alessio Signori; Howard Jack West; Giulio Metro; Alex Friedlaender; Kaushal Parikh; Giuseppe Luigi Banna; Alfredo Addeo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  Targeted therapy for advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (<I>ALK</I>)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Laird B Cameron; Nadia Hitchen; Elias Chandran; Tessa Morris; Renée Manser; Benjamin J Solomon; Vanessa Jordan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-07

3.  Impact of Smoking on Response to the First-Line Treatment of Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kehai Lin; Jie Lin; Zhong Huang; Jiding Fu; Qi Yi; Jiazuo Cai; Muhammad Khan; Yawei Yuan; Junguo Bu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 4.  Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Brigatinib in First-Line Treatments for Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yu; Fanfan Zhu; Wenxin Zhang; Shun Lu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Clinical Impact of Switching to Ceritinib After Severe AEs Related to Crizotinib/Alectinib in a Novel PTH2R-ALK Fusion Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report.

Authors:  Gang Shen; Yinping Du; Jifang Shen; Junling Zhang; Xihua Xia; Mengli Huang; Wenxiang Shen
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Treatment Strategies for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ling Peng; Dafeng Lu; Yang Xia; Shaodong Hong; Giovanni Selvaggi; Justin Stebbing; Yilan Sun; Fei Liang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Liquid biopsy and non-small cell lung cancer: are we looking at the tip of the iceberg?

Authors:  Laura Bonanno; Alessandro Dal Maso; Alberto Pavan; Elisabetta Zulato; Lorenzo Calvetti; Giulia Pasello; Valentina Guarneri; PierFranco Conte; Stefano Indraccolo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 9.075

8.  Exploring immune checkpoint inhibition in combination with anti-angiogenic therapy for patients with EGFR- or ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Andrea De Giglio; Alessandro Di Federico; Giulio Metro
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09

Review 9.  Use of Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) for Measurement of Therapy Predictive Biomarkers in Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Duffy; John Crown
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-01-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.