| Literature DB >> 33921384 |
Leif Hendrik Dröge1, Philipp Johannes Karras2,3, Manuel Guhlich1, Markus Anton Schirmer1, Michael Ghadimi2, Stefan Rieken1, Lena-Christin Conradi2, Martin Leu1.
Abstract
We retrospectively studied outcomes in patients treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy and surgery for esophageal squamous cell cancer. We put special focus on the comparison of patients treated with 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin ('Walsh') or carboplatin/paclitaxel ('CROSS'). We compared characteristics between patients treated according to 'Walsh' vs. 'CROSS'. Cox regression was performed to test for an association of parameters with outcomes. Study eligibility was met by 90 patients. First, the higher age and more comorbidities of the 'CROSS' patients, along with a shorter intensive care/intermediate care stay, might reflect an improvement in supportive and surgical/perioperative procedures over the periods. Second, the 'CROSS' patients experienced more hematologic toxicity and were less likely to complete chemotherapy as per protocol. This indicates that efforts should be taken to guide patients through a toxic treatment regimen by supportive measures. Third, the negative prognostic impact of radiochemotherapy-related toxicities (i.e., dysphagia and hematologic toxicities) and the duration of the intensive care/intermediate care unit stay underlines that further optimization of treatment procedures remains an important goal. We found no differences in tumor downstaging and survival between treatment regimen. Toxicity profiles could be improved by tailoring the regimen to individual patients (e.g., careful use of the taxane-based regimen in elderly patients).Entities:
Keywords: acute toxicity; chemotherapy regimen; complications; esophageal cancer; hematologic toxicity; pathological complete response; preoperative radiochemotherapy; prognostic factors
Year: 2021 PMID: 33921384 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639