Literature DB >> 33921263

Biomechanical Difference between Conventional Transtibial Single-Bundle and Anatomical Transportal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Analysis.

Jae Gyoon Kim1, Kyoung Tak Kang2, Joon Ho Wang3.   

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to analyze the graft contact stress at the tunnel after transtibial single-bundle (SB) and transportal double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. After transtibial SB (20 cases) and transportal DB (29 cases) ACL reconstruction, the three-dimensional image of each patient made by postoperative computed tomography was adjusted to the validation model of a normal knee and simulated SB and DB ACL reconstructions were created based on the average tunnel position and direction of each group. We also measured graft and contact stresses at the tunnel after a 134 N anterior load from 0° to 90° flexion. The graft and contact stresses became the greatest at 30° and 0° flexion, respectively. The total graft and contact stresses after DB ACL reconstruction were greater than those after SB ACL reconstruction from 0° to 30° and 0° to 90° knee flexion, respectively. However, the graft and contact stresses of each graft after DB ACL reconstruction were less than those after SB ACL reconstruction. In conclusion, the total graft and total contact stresses after DB ACL reconstruction are higher than those after SB ACL reconstruction from 0° to 30° and 0° to 90° knee flexion, respectively. However, the stresses of each graft after DB ACL reconstruction are about half of those after SB ACL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; contact stress; double bundle; finite element model; graft stress; knee; single bundle

Year:  2021        PMID: 33921263     DOI: 10.3390/jcm10081625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament surgical reconstruction through finite element analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Risvas; Dimitar Stanev; Lefteris Benos; Konstantinos Filip; Dimitrios Tsaopoulos; Konstantinos Moustakas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.