| Literature DB >> 33920664 |
Praveen Chandrasekharan1, Sylvia Gugino1, Justin Helman1, Carmon Koenigsknecht1, Lori Nielsen1, Nicole Bradley1, Jayasree Nair1, Vikash Agrawal2, Mausma Bawa1, Andreina Mari1, Munmun Rawat1, Satyan Lakshminrusimha3.
Abstract
(1) Background: Optimal initial oxygen (O2) concentration in preterm neonates is controversial. Our objectives were to compare the effect of delayed cord clamping with ventilation (DCCV) to early cord clamping followed by ventilation (ECCV) on O2 exposure, gas exchange, and hemodynamics in an asphyxiated preterm ovine model. (2)Entities:
Keywords: delayed cord clamping; oxygen exposure; preterm neonates
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920664 PMCID: PMC8073339 DOI: 10.3390/children8040307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Children (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9067
Characteristics of preterm lambs.
| Characteristics | ECC + V (N = 8) | DCC + V (N = 7) |
|---|---|---|
| Gestational age (days) | 127 ± 0.52 | 128 ± 0.84 |
| Female (N) | 4 | 3 |
| Birth weight (kg) | 3.3 ± 0.63 | 3.3 ± 0.70 |
| Born by multiplicity (N) | Twin–6 | Twin–4 |
| Heart rate at asphyxia (bpm) | 88 ± 8 | 86 ± 10 |
| Mean blood pressure at asphyxia (mmHg) | 36 ± 8 | 34 ± 10 |
| pH before resuscitation | 7.04 ± 0.08 | 7.0 ± 0.08 |
| PaCO2 before resuscitation( mmHg) | 90 ± 25 | 101 ± 23 |
| PaO2 before resuscitation (mmHg) | 14 ± 6 | 15 ± 11 |
Data presented as numbers or as average and standard deviation. ECC—early cord clamping, DCC—delayed cord clamping, V—ventilation. PaCO2—arterial carbon dioxide, PaO2—arterial oxygenation.
Figure 1Preductal SpO2 are shown on the y-axis and the events or duration of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) on the x-axis. The data are represented as average and standard deviation. The SpO2 between ECCV (early cord clamping followed by ventilation) and DCCV (delayed cord clamping with ventilation) was significantly different (* p < 0.05 by ANOVA).
Figure 2Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) is shown on the y-axis and the events or duration of PPV on the x-axis. The data are represented as average and standard deviation. The difference between ECCV and DCCV was significantly different (* p < 0.05 by ANOVA).
Figure 3The oxygen load (OL) in milliliters of oxygen per kilogram is shown on the y-axis. The box and whiskers plot shows a significantly higher OL with ECCV compared to DCCV. OL in ECCV was significantly higher compared to DCCV (* p < 0.05 by Kruskal-Wallis test).
Figure 4The PaO2 in mm Hg is shown on the y-axis and the events or duration of PPV on the x-axis. The PaO2 was significantly lower in DCCV (* p < 0.05 by ANOVA).
Figure 5The arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2 in mmHg) is shown on the y-axis and the events on the x-axis. The PaCO2 was significantly lower in DCCV compared to ECCV. (* p < 0.05 by ANOVA).
Figure 6The left peak PBF is shown on the y-axis and the events on the x-axis. The PBF was significantly higher with DCCV compared to ECCV (* p < 0.05 by ANOVA).
Figure 7The left peak CBF is shown on the y-axis and the events or duration of PPV on the x-axis.
Figure 8The benefits of delayed cord clamping and ventilation (DCCV) for 5 min in a lamb model of preterm asphyxia. With positive pressure ventilation and an intact cord, there was a mixing of lower umbilical vein oxygen tension (UVPO2) with higher pulmonary venous oxygen tension (PVO2) leading to overall systemic lower oxygen tension (PaO2)—“differential oxygenation” with alveolar hyperoxia but systemic normoxia. With the placenta and lungs simultaneously acting as organs of gas exchange, the arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) was lower (“dual-site gas exchange”). Copyright Satyan Lakshminrusimha.