| Literature DB >> 33920556 |
Justus Schikora1,2, Nina Kiwatrowski3,4, Nils Förster3,4, Leonie Selbach3,4, Friederike Ostendorf1, Frida Pallapies4, Britta Hasse1, Judith Metzdorf1,2, Ralf Gold1,2, Axel Mosig3,4, Lars Tönges1,2.
Abstract
Neuronal models of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's Disease (PD) are extensively studied in pathological and therapeutical research with neurite outgrowth being a core feature. Screening of neurite outgrowth enables characterization of various stimuli and therapeutic effects after lesion. In this study, we describe an autonomous computational assay for a high throughput skeletonization approach allowing for quantification of neurite outgrowth in large data sets from fluorescence microscopic imaging. Development and validation of the assay was conducted with differentiated SH-SY5Y cells and primary mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons (MDN) treated with the neurotoxic lesioning compound Rotenone. Results of manual annotation using NeuronJ and automated data were shown to correlate strongly (R2-value 0.9077 for SH-SY5Y cells and R2-value 0.9297 for MDN). Pooled linear regressions of results from SH-SY5Y cell image data could be integrated into an equation formula (y=0.5410·x+1792; y=0.8789·x+0.09191 for normalized results) with y depicting automated and x depicting manual data. This automated neurite length algorithm constitutes a valuable tool for modelling of neurite outgrowth that can be easily applied to evaluate therapeutic compounds with high throughput approaches.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson’s Disease; high throughput screening; neurite outgrowth; neurodegeneration; neuronal morphology; neurotoxicity; skeletonization
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920556 PMCID: PMC8072564 DOI: 10.3390/cells10040931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Neurite quantification software for high throughput screening of 2D immunocytofluorescence image data.
| Name | Degree of Automation | Morphology Measurements | Platform |
|---|---|---|---|
| NeuronJ [ | semi-automatic | neurite length | ImageJ |
| Cell Profiler [ | semi-automatic | neurite length | Python |
| NeuriteTracer [ | automatic | neurite length, soma number | ImageJ |
| NeurophologyJ [ | automatic | neurite length, soma number and size, | ImageJ |
| MorphoNeuroNet [ | automatic | neurite length, soma number and size, nucleus number, | ImageJ |
| Omnisphero [ | automatic | neurite area, neurite length, neurite branching points | Matlab |
| presented approach | automatic | neurite length, soma number and size, |
Figure 1Fully automated skeletonization of neurite outgrowth. (a) Shows a representative image of a coverslip (not to scale) from which three images (b) (scale bar µm) are added to the image data set. Each analyzed image spans px (representing ). For better visualization a representative section is shown in the following (c,d). Scale bars µm. For analysis of neurite outgrowth and morpholgy Alexa 488 channel (c) and DAPI channel (d) are seperated. (e) shows the processed DAPI channel image as a binary image. In (f) the processed Alexa 488 channel is depicted, showing the neurite and soma area as a binary image. The Alexa 488 channel image is skeletonized. The full skeleton without soma substraction is shown in (h). For better visualization the skeleton was morphologically dilated. For visual evaluation the skeleton with soma substraction, the binarized Alexa 488 and DAPI channel image combined into one image (g). Representative images of MDN as they were used in the validation of the presented approach are shown in (i). First, the input image is depicted with a merged Alexa 488 and DAPI channel image. For both Alexa 488 images the binarized image and afterwards produced skeleton are shown. For better visualization the skeleton was morphologically dilated. By combining the final skeleton and the input image the effectiveness of the skeletonization can be evaluated.
Figure 2Dose-dependet effect of different Rotenone concentrations (100 nM, 250 nM, 500 nM, 1000 nM, 2500 nM and 5000 nM) on differentiated SH-SY5Y cells: (a) Representative micrographs of differentiated SH-SY5Y cells 24 h after treatment with Rotenone and control conditions. Stained against Neurofilament (green). Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar µm. (b) Cell morphology of differentiated SH-SY5Y cells in higher magnification. Stained against Neurofilament (green). Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar µm. (c) Exemplary annotation of neurite outgrowth performed manually with the ImageJ-Plug-In NeuronJ. Scale bar µm.
Figure 3Comparison of results from automated and manual analysis. (a) Neurotoxic effect of Rotenone on the neurite network quantified with manual analysis: Mean neurite length per cell normalized to DMSO-treated solvent control (DMSO). (b) showing the neurotoxic effect of Rotenone on the neurite network quantified with automatically with our approach. Summed neurite length per image obtained from the output data was first normalized to cell count and afterwards normalized to DMSO. (c) showing results from automated analysis with two additional experiments. Data are shown as mean ± SM. * Significantly different () between mean of solvent control (DMSO) and mean of according Rotenone treatment condition. Respectively ** with , *** with and **** with . (d) Linear regression performed on results of summed neurite per image quantified with automated and manual analysis. (; ) (e) Linear regression performed on results of neurite length normalized to cell count and afterwards to positive control (CTRL) (; ). (f) Mean values from automated analysis compared to mean values obtained from manual analysis. (n.s. with ).
Figure 4Additional morphological endpoints analyzed by our approach. (a) Linear regression performed on results automated and manual cell count. (; ) The following endpoints were quantified: (b) cell number, (c) nucleus area, (d) cell body area and (e) neurite arborization. For interpretation results from quantification of cell number and neurite arborization were normalized to solvent control (DMSO). Values of nucleus and cell body area were first normalized to cell count and afterwards normalized to solvent control (DMSO). Data are shown as mean ± SM. * Significantly different () between mean of solvent control (DMSO) and mean of according Rotenone treatment condition. Respectively ** with , *** with and **** with .
Figure 5Further validation with MDN. (a) Linear regression performed on results of summed neurite length per image quantified with the presented approach and manual analysis using NeuronJ. (; ) (b) Representative micrographs showing a selection of experimental conditions (positive control (CTRL) and 10 nM and 40 nM Rotenone). Stained against TH (green). Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 100 µm. (c) Linear regression performed on results of neurite length normalized to the number of TH-cells and afterwards to positive control. (; ) (d) Neurotoxic effects of Rotenone on the neurite network of MDN quantified with manual analysis. Mean neurite length per cell normalized to TH-cells. (e) Linear regression performed on results of neurite length normalized to cell count and afterwards to positive control. (; ) (f) showing the neurotoxic effects of Rotenone quantified using the presented neurite outgrowth quantification assay. Mean neurite length per cell normalized to TH-cells. Data are shown as mean ± SM. * Significantly different () between mean of solvent control (DMSO) and mean of according Rotenone treatment condition. Respectively ** with , *** with and **** with .