| Literature DB >> 33920465 |
Yutaka Fujii1, Takuya Abe1, Kikuo Ikegami2.
Abstract
Systemic inflammatory responses in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) contribute significantly to ECMO-associated morbidity and mortality. In recent years, the number of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients has increased, and the number of these patients undergoing ECMO has also increased. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a high-risk factor for complications during ECMO. We studied the effects of ECMO on inflammatory response in a diabetic rat ECMO model. Twenty-eight rats were divided into 4 groups: normal SHAM group (normal rats: n = 7), diabetic SHAM group (diabetic rats: n = 7), normal ECMO group (normal rats: n = 7), and diabetic ECMO group (diabetic rats: n = 7). We measured the plasma levels of cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-6. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), and liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) were examined in the rat cardiopulmonary bypass model to ascertain organ damage. In addition, the lung wet-to-dry weight (W/D) ratio was measured as an index of pulmonary tissue edema. A pathologic evaluation of kidneys was conducted by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and periodic-acid-methenamine-silver (PAM) staining. In the diabetic ECMO group, levels of cytokines, AST, ALT, LDH, and L-FABP increased significantly, reaching a maximum at the end of ECMO in comparison with other groups (p < 0.05). In addition, hematoxylin-eosin and periodic acid-methenamine-silver staining of renal tissues showed marked injury in the ECMO group (normal ECMO and diabetic ECMO groups). Furthermore, when the normal ECMO and diabetic ECMO groups were compared, severe organ injury was seen in the diabetic ECMO group. There was remarkable organ injury in the diabetic ECMO group. These data demonstrate that diabetes enhances proinflammatory cytokine release, renal damage, and pulmonary edema during ECMO in an animal model.Entities:
Keywords: ECMO; diabetes; inflammatory response; rat ECMO model
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920465 PMCID: PMC8068986 DOI: 10.3390/membranes11040283
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Figure 1Extracorporeal circulation in a rat extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) model.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of experimental design.
Hemodynamic variables, blood gas partial pressures, hemoglobin, and pH before and during ECMO.
| Variable | Group | Pre-ECMO | ECMO 60 min | ECMO 120 min |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAP (mmHg) | Normal SHAM | 99 ± 3 | 92 ± 6 | 84 ± 5 |
| Diabetic SHAM | 94 ± 3 | 88 ± 4 | 83 ± 5 | |
| Normal ECMO | 97 ± 3 | 76 ± 5 †* | 75 ± 4 †* | |
| Diabetic ECMO | 96 ± 2 | 79 ± 4 †* | 77 ± 4 †* | |
| HR (beat/min) | Normal SHAM | 368 ± 12 | 366 ± 11 | 374 ± 5 |
| Diabetic SHAM | 353 ± 10 | 349 ± 11 | 360 ± 9 | |
| Normal ECMO | 375 ± 11 | 369 ± 14 | 343 ± 7 †* | |
| Diabetic ECMO | 362 ± 11 | 357 ± 18 | 346 ± 14 †* | |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | Normal SHAM | 98 ± 2 | 98 ± 2 | 102 ± 4 |
| Diabetic SHAM | 100 ± 2 | 99 ± 2 | 98 ± 1 | |
| Normal ECMO | 100 ± 4 | 301 ± 21 †* | 290 ± 19 †* | |
| Diabetic ECMO | 102 ± 4 | 289 ± 20 †* | 295 ± 17 †* | |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | Normal SHAM | 40 ± 2 | 40 ± 1 | 38 ± 3 |
| Diabetic SHAM | 39 ± 1 | 38 ± 2 | 39 ± 1 | |
| Normal ECMO | 40 ± 1 | 39 ± 1 | 38 ± 1 | |
| Diabetic ECMO | 41 ± 1 | 39 ± 1 | 38 ± 1 | |
| Hb (g/dL) | Normal SHAM | 14.1 ± 0.5 | 13.9 ± 0.5 | 13.0 ± 0.6 |
| Diabetic SHAM | 14.0 ± 0.4 | 12.6 ± 0.5 | 12.9 ± 0.5 | |
| Normal ECMO | 14.4 ± 0.2 | 10.4 ± 0.5 †* | 10.2 ± 0.5 †* | |
| Diabetic ECMO | 14.0 ± 0.2 | 10.3 ± 0.7 †* | 10.5 ± 0.5 †* | |
| pH | Normal SHAM | 7.35 ± 0.03 | 7.37 ± 0.03 | 7.40 ± 0.03 |
| Diabetic SHAM | 7.36 ± 0.02 | 7.37 ± 0.03 | 7.39 ± 0.02 | |
| Normal ECMO | 7.37 ± 0.02 | 7.38 ± 0.02 | 7.39 ± 0.03 | |
| Diabetic ECMO | 7.37 ± 0.02 | 7.40 ± 0.01 | 7.40 ± 0.02 |
Variables are expressed by mean ± standard error. † p < 0.05 versus Normal SHAM group at the same time, * p < 0.05 versus Diabetic SHAM group at the same time. MAP: mean arterial pressure, HR: heart rate, PaO2: partial pressure of arterial oxygen, PaCO2: partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide, Hb: hemoglobin, and pH: power of hydrogen.
Figure 3Plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (a), interleukin (IL)-6 (b), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (c), aminotransferase (ALT) (d), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (e), creatinine (Cr) (f), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (g), and liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) (h). † p < 0.05 versus normal SHAM group at the same time point, * p < 0.05 versus diabetic SHAM group at the same time point, ** p < 0.05 versus normal cardiopulmonary bypass group at the same time point.
Figure 4Wet-to-dry (W/D) ratio of the left lung at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass. † p < 0.05 versus normal SHAM group at the same time, * p < 0.05 versus diabetic SHAM group at the same time, ** p < 0.05 versus normal ECMO group at the same.
Figure 5Pathological image of renal tissue (at 200-fold magnification). HE, hematoxylin-eosin; PAM, periodic acid-methenamine-silver stain. Scale bar: 50 μm. Normal SHAM: Intact. Diabetic SHAM: Slight cytolysis was shown, and the organ structure was maintained. Normal ECMO: Cell injury was similar to the level of diabetic SHAM rats. Diabetic ECMO: Tubular epithelium was desquamated from the basement membrane.