| Literature DB >> 33920217 |
Ruxandra Ștefănescu1, Lenard Farczadi2, Adina Huțanu2,3, Bianca E Ősz4, Marius Mărușteri5, Ancuța Negroiu6, Camil E Vari4.
Abstract
The present project aims to evaluate Tribulus terrestris (TT) extracts by addressing various possible mechanisms of action in order to see whether the use of TT supplements in diabetes and diabetes complications is justified. Diabetic rats were divided into three groups: diabetic control group, TT extract with low protodioscin content group (TT-LPC) and TT extract with high protodioscin content group (TT-HPC). After twelve weeks of treatment, fasting blood glucose, insulin, LH, FSH and testosterone levels were measured. Both TT preparations reduced elevated blood glucose level. Insulin and luteinizing hormone levels were not significantly different compared with the control group; however, the FSH and testosterone levels were significantly higher in the TT-HPC group compared with the diabetic control group. The testosterone level is correlated in part with the protodioscin concentration in extracts and is probably mediated through an FSH-linked pathway.Entities:
Keywords: Tribulus terrestris; diabetes; erectile dysfunction; steroidal saponins
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920217 PMCID: PMC8069229 DOI: 10.3390/plants10040744
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Fasting blood glucose variations during the experiment.
| Week | DC | TT-LPC | TT-HPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | 106 ± 5.7 | 114.25 ± 7.98 | 110.63 ± 7.78 |
| Week 1 | 360.75 ± 89.8 † | 505.12 ± 95.85 ‡ | 432.75 ± 96.5 ‡ |
| Week 2 | 378.3 ± 162.4 ‡ | 447 ± 83.38 ‡ | 167.88 ± 101.91 |
| Week 4 | 302. 25 ± 144.4 * | 380.62 ± 99.38 ‡ | 200.63 ± 168.53 |
| Week 6 | 318.88 ± 131.5 # | 341.12 ± 107.08 # | 189.63 ± 142.69 |
| Week 8 | 337.75 ± 76.6 # | 264.62 ± 97.72 | 195.63 ± 103.66 |
| Week 10 | 289.75 ± 102.3 * | 301.37 ± 118.65 * | 253 ± 174.26 |
| Week 12 | 354.5 ± 53.8 † | 279.12 ± 93.33 | 216.38 ± 132.47 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The superscript indicates a significant difference between the values from week 0 compared with the values from all other weeks, in the same group. * p < 0.05, # p < 0.01, † p < 0.001, ‡ p < 0.0001.
Weight variations during the experiment.
| Week | DC | TT-LPC | TT-HPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | 244 ± 43.3 | 253.75 ± 28.75 | 247.5 ± 28.6 |
| Week 1 | 285 ± 45.5 | 329 ± 36.95 # | 310 ± 28.78 * |
| Week 2 | 332 ± 39.4 † | 282.5 ± 55.48 | 306.25 ± 37 |
| Week 4 | 332 ± 37.7 † | 305 ± 24.49 | 320 ± 23.3 # |
| Week 6 | 320 ± 44 # | 283.75 ± 32.04 | 338.75 ± 42.57 † |
| Week 8 | 312 ± 47.3 * | 278.75 ± 34.82 | 342.5 ± 43.01 ‡ |
| Week 10 | 311.11 ± 45.1 * | 297.5 ± 28.66 | 353.5 ± 52.01 ‡ |
| Week 12 | 307.78 ± 43.2 * | 286.25 ± 36.23 | 358.75 ± 32.7 ‡ |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The superscript indicates a significant difference between the values from week 0 compared with the values from all other weeks, in the same groups. * p < 0.05, # p < 0.01, † p < 0.001, ‡ p < 0.0001.
Oral glucose tolerance test.
| Time (min) | DC | TT-LPC | TT-HPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 318.88 ± 131.5 | 341.12 ± 107.08 | 189.63 ± 142.69 |
| 30 | 364.5 ± 196.8 | 361.22 ± 118.08 | 213.7 ± 109.31 |
| 60 | 315.13 ± 155.32 | 350.22 ± 101.32 | 210.2 ± 117.49 |
| 90 | 326.75 ± 129.85 | 332.22 ± 104.47 | 183.2 ± 88.95 |
| 120 | 308.75 ± 81.49 | 280.37 ± 95.07 | 180.62 ± 86.4 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Normal cells in sperm morphology evaluation.
| DC | TT-LPC | TT-HPC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| % normal cells | 71 ± 6.41 | 81 ± 7.76 | 78.88 ± 6.98 |
Data are expressed as mean % ± standard deviation.
Figure 1Biochemical parameters; bars represent means ± SD for ten rats in each group for LH and FSH; for insulin in DC group n = 8, in TT-LPC group n = 9 and in TT-HPC group n = 8; * represents significant differences compared with DC and TT-LPC groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Testosterone levels in the experimental groups. Bars represent mean ± SD for eight rats in each group; bars marked with; # represents significant differences compared with DC and TT-LPC groups at (p < 0.01).
Figure 3Photos of lenses from each group.