| Literature DB >> 33920187 |
Tara R Price1, Sangeetha A Baskaran2, Kristin L Moncada2, Yasushi Minamoto3, Cory Klemashevich4, Arul Jayuraman4, Jan S Sucholdoski3, Luis O Tedeschi5,6, Jörg M Steiner3, Suresh D Pillai6,7, Rosemary L Walzem2,6.
Abstract
Various proteins or protein fractions reportedly positively affect gastrointestinal integrity and inflammation in diets providing >45% energy as fat. This study tested whether benefits were seen in diets providing 30% of energy as fat. Purified diets (PD) with isolated soy protein (ISP), dried whole milk powder (DWMP), milk fat globule membrane (MFGM), or milk protein concentrate (MPC) as protein sources were fed to C57BL/6J mice (n = 15/diet group) for 13 weeks. MFGM-fed mice were heaviest (p < 0.005) but remained within breeder norms. Growth rates and gut motility were similar for all PD-fed mice. FITC-dextran assessed gut permeability was lowest in DWMP and MFGM (p = 0.054); overall, plasma endotoxin and unprovoked circulating cytokines indicated a non-inflammatory state for all PD-fed mice. Despite differences in cecal butyrate and intestinal gene expression, all PDs supported gastrointestinal health. Whole milk provided more positive effects compared to its fractions. However, ISP-fed mice showed a >370%, (p < 0.006) increase in colonic myeloperoxidase activity indicative of tissue neutrophil infiltration. Surprisingly, FITC-dextran and endotoxin outcomes were many folds better in PD-fed mice than mice (strain, vendor, age and sex matched) fed a "chow-type" nutritionally adequate non-PD. Additional variables within a diet's matrix appear to affect routine indicators or gastrointestinal health.Entities:
Keywords: bodyweight; dairy proteins; gastrointestinal permeability; intestinal health; isolated soy protein; myeloperoxidase; saturated fatty acids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920187 PMCID: PMC8069602 DOI: 10.3390/nu13041251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Diet Composition.
| ISP | DWMP | MPC | MFGM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein, % by weight | 18.7 | 18.0 | 18.6 | 18.6 |
| Carbohydrate, % by weight | 46.9 | 46.4 | 47.8 | 47.1 |
| Fat, % by weight | 12.2 | 12.4 | 12.1 | 12.5 |
| Cholesterol mg/kg | 95 | 378 | 139 | 74 |
| Cholesterol (% by weight) | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Calcium (%) | 0.37 | 0.89 | 0.55 | 0.12 |
| Ca:P | 1.37 | 3.62 | 1.49 | 1.67 |
| Protein, % kcal from | 20.1 | 19.5 | 19.9 | 19.8 |
| Carbohydrate, % kcal from | 50.4 | 50.3 | 51.1 | 50.2 |
| Fat, % kcal from | 29.5 | 30.2 | 29.1 | 30 |
| Saturated Fat, % of total fat | 33.8 | 58.6 | 35.4 | 55.5 |
| MUFA, % of total fat | 39.7 | 26.5 | 40.1 | 31.5 |
| PUFA, % of total fat | 26.5 | 14.9 | 24.5 | 12.9 |
| Kcal/g | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.8 |
Values are calculated from ingredient analysis or manufacturer data. ISP, isolated soy protein; DWMP, dried whole milk powder; MPC, milk protein concentrate; MFGM, milk fat globule membrane; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Animal Growth and Feed Intake.
| ISP | DWMP | MPC | MFGM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start Weight | 16.0 ± 1.24 | 16.9 ± 1.24 | 16.0 ± 1.24 | 16.7 ± 1.24 | 0.183 |
| Final Weight | 30.0 ± 1.49 b | 30.3 ± 1.49 b | 29.6 ± 1.49 b | 32.3 ± 1.49 a | 0.002 |
| Weight Gain | 13.7 ± 1.49 b | 13.9 ± 1.49 b | 13.2 ± 1.49 b | 16.0 ± 1.49 a | 0.002 |
| Total Feed Disappearance | 256 ± 7.09 ab | 267 ± 7.09 a | 252 ± 7.09 b | 263 ± 7.08 a | 0.004 |
| Feed Efficiency | 19.6 ± 1.89 a | 20.3 ± 1.89 a | 19.9 ± 1.89 a | 17.5 ± 1.89 b | 0.004 |
Data represents values from all cohorts; n = 15 mice/diet group. Values are means (g) ± SEM; feed efficiency values are means (g feed/g gain) ± SEM. Different letters (a,b) signify differences between groups (p < 0.05). ISP, isolated soy protein; DWMP, dried whole milk powder; MPC, milk protein concentrate; MFGM, milk fat globule membrane.
Organ Weights.
| ISP | DWMP | MPC | MFGM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver | 1.21 ± 0.05 ab | 1.10 ± 0.05 b | 1.08 ± 0.05 b | 1.34 ± 0.05 a | 0.000 |
| Cecum | 0.32 ± 0.02 ab | 0.39 ± 0.02 a | 0.31 ± 0.02 b | 0.28 ± 0.02 b | 0.001 |
| Retroperitoneal Fat Pad | 0.33 ± 0.06 ab | 0.27 ± 0.06 b | 0.30 ± 0.06 b | 0.36 ± 0.06 a | 0.004 |
| Gastrocnemius Muscle | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.292 |
| Spleen | 0.081 ± 0.007 | 0.078 ± 0.008 | 0.080 ± 0.007 | 0.083 ± 0.007 | 0.825 |
| Thymus (mg) | 32.3 ± 1.93 | 32.7 ± 2.09 | 34.4 ± 1.94 | 33.2 ± 2.06 | 0.868 |
Data represents values from all cohorts; n = 15 mice/diet group unless otherwise noted. Values are means (g) ± SEM; thymus values are means (mg) ± standard errors. Different letters (a,b) signify differences between groups (p < 0.05). ISP, isolated soy protein; DWMP, dried whole milk powder; MPC, milk protein concentrate; MFGM, milk fat globule membrane.
Markers of gastrointestinal (GI) integrity and systemic inflammatory tone.
| ISP | DWMP | MPC | MFGM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transit Time (hours) | 3.24 ± 0.37 | 2.83 ± 0.39 | 3.14 ± 0.60 | 3.58 ± 1.42 | 0.930 |
| Endotoxin (EU/mL) | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.875 |
| FITC-Dextran (ug/mL) | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.0545 |
| IgA (ug/mL) | 161 ± 18.2 c | 212 ± 18.2 b | 204 ± 18.2 bc | 285 ± 18.2 a | 0.000 |
| IFN-γ | <LOD | <LOD | 0.04 ± 0.04 | <LOD | -- |
| IL-1β | 0.55 ± 0.55 | 3.59 ± 3.47 | 5.08 ± 1.75 | 3.18 ± 1.52 | 0.483 |
| IL-6 | 100 ± 52.9 | 41.9 ± 23.5 | 57.6 ± 18.9 | 35.4 ± 14.7 | 0.469 |
| IL-12p70 | 8.81 ± 3.66 | 7.11 ± 3.55 | 4.42 ± 1.52 | 1.84 ± 1.23 | 0.295 |
| MIP-2 | 112 ± 43 | 90.8 ± 38 | 94.6 ± 26 | 96.0 ± 25 | 0.971 |
| TNF-α | <LOD | <LOD | 18.2 ± 7.14 a | 4.84 ± 1.67 b | 0.007 |
| IL-10 | 0.21 ± 0.21 | <LOD | <LOD | 0.35 ± 0.28 | 0.438 |
| Eotaxin | 4215 ± 238 | 4107 ± 172 | 3773 ± 201 | 3780 ± 211 | 0.318 |
| MPO (uU/mL) | 36.3 ± 10.7 a | 9.75 ± 2.59 b | 8.16 ± 1.70 b | 8.36 ± 1.23 b | 0.006 |
| ALP (mg/mL) | 4.49 ± 0.90 | 2.65 ± 0.38 | 2.28 ± 0.26 | 2.99 ± 0.26 | 0.118 |
Values are means ± SEM; Different letters signify differences between groups (p < 0.05). Myeloperoxidase (MPO) results are expressed as uU/mL, where 1 uU = 1 pmol/min activity. ISP, isolated soy protein; DWMP, dried whole milk powder; MPC, milk protein concentrate; MFGM, milk fat globule membrane.
Figure 1Representative sections from H&E-stained small intestine slides scanned at 20× magnification. Black bars represent distance measured for determination of villi length. ISP, isolated soy protein; DWMP, dried whole milk powder; MPC, milk protein concentrate; MFGM, milk fat globule membrane.
Small intestine morphology.
| ISP | DWMP | MPC | MFGM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Villous Height | 234 ± 27.0 | 264 ± 29.8 | 269 ± 18.9 | 262 ± 41.8 | 0.760 |
| Villous Width | 64.0 ± 3.65 | 58.9 ± 4.55 | 66.2 ± 1.48 | 71.0 ± 1.41 | 0.104 |
| Crypt Depth | 75.7 ± 3.63 | 87.9 ± 4.27 | 89.9 ± 3.90 | 86.8 ± 5.89 | 0.077 |
| Crypt Width | 27.8 ± 1.93 | 27.3 ± 0.86 | 30.3 ± 0.62 | 28.9 ± 0.80 | 0.594 |
| Smooth Muscle | 33.5 ± 2.02 | 40.5 ± 3.74 | 32.9 ± 2.06 | 31.2 ± 3.54 | 0.189 |
Data represents values from n = 5 mice/diet group. Individual data points were averaged to produce a single value per mouse for each measure. Values are means (um) ± SEM. (p < 0.05). ISP, isolated soy protein; DWMP, dried whole milk powder; MPC, milk protein concentrate; MFGM, milk fat globule membrane.
Figure 2Intestinal gene expression: innate inflammatory markers. Gene expression data were from small intestines of n = 5/diet; fold increases were considered significant if at least 2-fold different from the ISP comparator and are denoted by the use of “*” TLR4 was increased 2.3-fold in MFGM compared to ISP; however, downstream responses (NFkB and TNFa) were modestly downregulated. Tight Junction Protein (ZO-1) was downregulated 2.4-fold in MPC compared to ISP.
Figure 3Intestinal gene expression: cannabinoids and endocannabinoids. Gene expression data were from small intestines of n = 5/diet; fold increases were considered significant if at least 2-fold different from the ISP comparator and are denoted by the use of “*”. CB2 was increased 2.5-fold in intestines from milk fat globule membrane (MFGM)-fed mice compared to ISP. Other CB and eCB genes were unchanged.
Figure 4Intestinal gene expression: adipocyte differentiation and lipogenesis. Gene expression data from small intestines of n = 5/diet; fold increases were considered significant if at least 2-fold different from the ISP comparator and are denoted by the use of “*”. AP2 was increased 2.75-fold and SREBP-1c increased 2-fold in intestines from MFGM-fed mice compared to ISP. Intestines of milk protein concentrate (MPC)-fed mice showed a 2-fold and 2.3-fold reduction in PPAR-γ and FASN, respectively, relative to ISP. Other adipocyte differentiation and lipogenesis genes were unchanged.
Cecal metabolite content.
| ISP | DWMP | MPC | MFGM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indole | 159 ± 99.3 | 239 ± 101 | 90.4 ± 100 | 252 ± 97.4 | 0.274 |
| Acetic Acid | 23.8 ± 5.15 | 17.5 ± 5.14 | 18.3 ± 5.17 | 21.7 ± 5.14 | 0.066 |
| Propionic Acid | 1.79 ± 0.42 | 1.60 ± 0.42 | 1.67 ± 0.44 | 2.37 ± 0.42 | 0.428 |
| Butyric Acid | 4.23 ± 0.32 a | 3.48 ± 0.32 a | 2.21 ± 0.33 b | 3.47 ± 0.32 a | 0.000 |
| Isobutyric Acid | 0.26 ± 0.09 | 0.22 ± 0.09 | 0.25 ± 0.10 | 0.25 ± 0.09 | 0.836 |
| Isovaleric Acid | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.107 |
| Valeric Acid | 0.25 ± 0.09 | 0.23 ± 0.09 | 0.20 ± 0.09 | 0.30 ± 0.09 | 0.129 |
| Total SCFA | 30.4 ± 2.93 | 23.1 ± 2.93 | 23.2 ± 3.03 | 28.2 ± 2.93 | 0.209 |
Indole values represent concentrations in nMol/g cecal content ± SEM. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) values are expressed as average uMol/g cecal content ± SEM. Total SCFAs were calculated by adding the concentrations of all SCFA measured in cecal content. Different letters signify differences between groups (p < 0.05). ISP, isolated soy protein; DWMP, dried whole milk powder; MPC, milk protein concentrate; MFGM, milk fat globule membrane.
Figure 5FITC-dextran permeability of chow-fed vs. purified diet-fed mice. Chow-fed mice (n = 10) averaged 18.9 ± 5.77 ug/mL FITC-d plasma fluorescence, a 118-fold increase over the average of all purified diet-fed mice. Purified diets (n = 60) averaged 0.16 ± 0.01 ug/mL FITC-d plasma fluorescence.
Figure 6Plasma endotoxin concentrations of chow-fed vs. purified diet-fed mice. Plasma endotoxin content, measured by the limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay, averaged 0.352 ± 0.011 EU/mL for chow-fed mice (n = 10) compared to average 0.109 ± 0.004 EU/mL for purified diet-fed mice (n = 60). Chow-fed mice showed a 322% increase in plasma compared to the average of purified diet-fed mice.