| Literature DB >> 33920053 |
Shujahadeen B Aziz1,2, Elham M A Dannoun3, M H Hamsan4, Rebar T Abdulwahid1,5, Kuldeep Mishra6, Muaffaq M Nofal7, M F Z Kadir4.
Abstract
The current work shows the preparation of plasticized chitosan-magnesium acetate Mg(CH3COO)2-based polymer electrolyte dispersed with nickel (Ni) metal complexes via solution casting. Investigations of electrical and electrochemical properties of the prepared polymer composite electrolyte were carried out. The structural and optical properties of the samples were studied using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and UV-Vis spectroscopy techniques. The structural and optical outcomes revealed a clear enhancement in both absorbance and amorphous nature of the samples upon the addition of Ni metal complexes. Through the simulation of impedance data, various ion transport parameters were calculated. The electrochemical performance of the sample was examined by means of transference number measurement (TNM), linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements. The TNM analysis confirmed the dominance of ions as the main charge carrier in the electrolyte with tion of (0.96) compared to only (0.04) for tel. The present electrolyte was stable in the range of 0 V to 2.4 V, which was obtained from linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). A result from CV proved that the electrical double-layer capacitor (EDLC) has a capacitive behavior as no redox peaks could be observed. The presence of Ni improved the charge-discharge cycle of the EDLC due to its amorphous behavior. The average performances of the EDLC were recorded as 41.7 F/g, 95%, 5.86 Wh/kg and 628 W/kg for specific capacitance, coulombic efficiency, energy and power densities, respectively. The fabricated EDLC device was found to be stable up to 1000 cycles.Entities:
Keywords: CV; EDLC device; TNM and LSV analysis; impedance study; metal complex; plasticized polymer electrolyte; structural analysis
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920053 PMCID: PMC8071024 DOI: 10.3390/membranes11040289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Figure 1Absorption spectrum for colloidal suspension of Ni2+-metal complex.
Figure 2Absorption spectra of pure chitosan (CS) and CS:Mg(CH3COO)2:Gly:Ni composite system.
Figure 3X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) pure CS (b) CS:Mg(CH3COO)2:Gly:Ni CS systems.
Figure 4Electrical impedance plot and equivalent circuit diagram (inset) of the prepared polymer electrolyte.
Various parameters of the circuit elements for the prepared polymer electrolyte system.
| Electrical Equivalent Circuit (EEC) Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| n1 (rad) | 0.71 |
| n2 (rad) | 0.53 |
| K1 (F−1) | 2.6 × 108 |
| K2 (F−1) | 1.05 × 105 |
| Y1 (F) | 3.85 × 10−9 |
| Y2 (F) | 9.52 × 10−6 |
| Rb (Ω) | 1.6 × 103 |
Ion transport parameters of the prepared polymer electrolyte system.
| Ion Transport Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| σdc (S cm−1) | 1.09 × 10−5 |
| D (cm2 s−1) | 4.91 × 10−8 |
| µ (cm2 V−1 s) | 1.91 × 10−6 |
| n (cm−3) | 3.55 × 1019 |
Figure 5Polarization current against time for the prepared polymer electrolyte sample.
Figure 6Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curve of the prepared polymer electrolyte system.
Figure 7Variation in cyclic voltammetry (CV) plot shapes with changing the scan rate for the fabricated electrical double-layer capacitor (EDLC).
Variation in capacitance values with respect to different scan rates.
| Scan Rate (mV/s) | Capacitance (F/g) |
|---|---|
| 10 | 27.793 |
| 20 | 19.835 |
| 50 | 11.349 |
| 100 | 6.032 |
Figure 8Charge–discharge pattern of the fabricated electric double layer capacitor (EDLC) at specific cycles.
Figure 9(a) Voltage drop pattern and (b) equivalent series resistance (ESR) pattern of the EDLC throughout the 1000 cycles.
Figure 10Satiability in specific capacitance value of the fabricated EDLC up to 1000 cycles at 0.5 mA/cm2.
Figure 11Coulombic efficiency plot over 1000 cycle for the fabricated EDLC.
Figure 12The plot of energy (E) of the fabricated EDLC throughout 1000 cycles.
Figure 13Power density of the fabricated EDLC throughout 1000 cycles.
General performance of the fabricated EDLC device compared to the other EDLC devices based on various polymer electrolytes in terms of specific capacitance (Cs), energy density (E), power density (P) and cycle number.
| Electrolyte System | Cs | E | P | Cycle No. | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dextran:NH4Br | 2.05 | - | - | 100 | [ |
| PVA:Dextran:NH4I | 4.2 | 0.55 | 64 | 100 | [ |
| Corn starch: LiClO4: SiO2 | 9.83 | 0.9 | 135 | 500 | [ |
| CS:MC:NH4I:Gly | 9.97 | 1.1 | 578.55 | 100 | [ |
| PVA:LiClO4:TiO2 | 12.5 | 1.56 | 198.7 | 1000 | [ |
| CS-κ-carrageenan-NH4NO3 | 18.5 | - | 1.8 | 20 | [ |
| PVA:CH3COONH4:BmImBr | 21.89 | 1.36 | 34.66 | 500 | [ |
| CS-PVA-NH4NO3-EC | 27.1 | - | - | 100 | [ |
| MC:PS:NH4NO3:Gly | 31 | 2.3 | 385 | 1000 | [ |
| CS-PVA-Mg(CF3SO3)2:GL | 32.69 | - | 100 | [ | |
| MC-NH4NO3- PEG | 38 | 3.9 | 140 | 100 | [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where: NH4Br = ammonium bromide, MC = methylcellulose, NH4I = ammonium iodide, LiClO4 = lithium perchlorate, SiO2 = silicon dioxide, TiO2 = titanium dioxide, NH4NO3 = ammonium nitrate, CH3COONH4 = ammonium acetate, BmImBr = 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide, EC = ethylene glycol, PS = potato starch, PEG = poly(ethylene glycol), Mg(CF3SO3)2 = magnesium triflate.