| Literature DB >> 33919844 |
Feng Xiao1,2,3,4, Yang Zhao1,2,3,4, Xiu-Rong Wang1, Qiao Liu1,2,3,4, Jie Ran1.
Abstract
Pinus massoniana Lamb. is an important coniferous tree species in ecological environment construction and sustainable forestry development. The function of gene gradual change and coexpression modules of needle and root parts of P. massoniana under continuous drought stress is unclear. The physiological and transcriptional expression profiles of P. massoniana seedlings from 1a half-sibling progeny during drought stress were measured and analyzed. As a result, under continuous drought conditions, needle peroxidase (POD) activity and proline content continued to increase. The malondialdehyde (MDA) content in roots continuously increased, and the root activity continuously decreased. The needles of P. massoniana seedlings may respond to drought mainly through regulating abscisic acid (ABA) and jasmonic acid (JA) hormone-related pathways. Roots may provide plant growth through fatty acid β-oxidative decomposition, and peroxisomes may contribute to the production of ROS, resulting in the upregulation of the antioxidant defense system. P. massoniana roots and needles may implement the same antioxidant mechanism through the glutathione metabolic pathway. This study provides basic data for identifying the drought response mechanisms of the needles and roots of P. massoniana.Entities:
Keywords: Pinus massoniana; coexpression; drought; hormone; peroxisome
Year: 2021 PMID: 33919844 PMCID: PMC8070838 DOI: 10.3390/plants10040769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Physiological changes of P. massoniana under persistent drought stress. (a) Absolute water content in soil (AMC); (b) malondialdehyde (MDA) content in needles; (c) needle proline (Pro) content; (d) needle peroxidase (POD) activity; (e) MDA content in roots; (f) root activity; (g) correlation analysis of various biochemical indicators; (h) PCA analysis. Note: In Figure 1a–f, we used the “0 d” group as a reference to compare the mean and added p-value and significance markers (“*” indicates that there is a difference compared with the “0 d” group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001 and “ns” means no difference). In Figure 1g, the number represents the magnitude of the correlation, and the color represents the positive and negative correlations.
Figure 2Correlation between samples and PCA analysis. (a) Correlation heatmap between samples (the correlation value is greater than 0.7; the correlation method selects person correlation); (b) principal component analysis (ellipse shows 95% confidence interval).
Figure 3Heatmap and dotted line diagram of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of transcription factors (TFs) in different periods. Note: The value in the heatmap is the number of DEGs corresponding to the comparison combination, and the value of DEG >50 is displayed. The left heatmap is downregulated, and the right heatmap is upregulated; the percentage value represents the ratio of up/downregulation of TFs in different combinations.
Figure 4Cluster analysis of gene expression trends during drought stress in P. massoniana. (a.1) and (a.2): Two STEM significance modules (needle Profile9 and needle Profile41) of the needles during drought stress; (b.1) and (b.2): Two short time-series expression miner (STEM) significance modules (root Profile9 and root Profile41) of the roots during drought stress. Note: We used STEM software to perform trend clustering analysis and divided the trends into 5 stages according to the time before and after input and normalized the union of all the combined DEGs from the five stages. The left side of each subfigure is the significant module selected in the STEM analysis; the right side is the box plot of the corresponding gene expression after taking the logarithm.
Figure 5Root and needle coexpression network analysis of the P. massoniana drought process. (a) Overlap between needle set-specific and root set-specific modules in P. massoniana; (b) different module gene expression patterns in needles and roots. Note: In subfigure (a), each row in the table corresponds to one needle set-specific module, and each column corresponds to one root set-specific module. The number in the labeled heatmap indicates the genes counted in the intersection between two parts of P. massoniana. Coloring of the table indicates significant overlap, evaluated using Fisher’s exact test. In subfigure (b), the left side of the double-axis represents the needles, the right side represents the roots, the text includes the number of modules and module names, and the gene trends in the module are processed by taking the logarithm of the gene expression in the module, fitted in a linear simulation.