| Literature DB >> 33919805 |
Claudia Eleni1, Alessia Mariacher2, Goffredo Grifoni1, Elena Cardini2, Sara Tonon1, Andrea Lombardo3, Antonino Barone4, Gianluca Fichi2.
Abstract
The genus Pearsonema, in the nematode family Capillariidae, includes several species that parasitize the urinary bladders of wild and domestic carnivores. The infection has been reported worldwide from several wildlife species, including canids, mustelids, and felids, but the pathological aspects have seldom been investigated. In order to assess the presence and severity of the lesions in Pearsonema-infected wildlife, we performed a parasitological and pathological examination of urinary bladders from 72 animals, belonging to the families Canidae (red fox Vulpes vulpes, n = 28, and wolf Canis lupus, n = 29) and Mustelidae (beech marten Martes foina, n = 3; pine marten Martes martes, n = 2; and European badger Meles meles, n = 10). A greater prevalence of infection for canids (64.91%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 52.52-77.30%) than for mustelids (13.33%) (p < 0.001) was recorded. The prevalence of infection in red foxes was 75.0% (95% CI, 58.96-91.04%), in accordance with other reports from European countries, supporting the role of this species as a reservoir for infection. Eosinophilic cystitis was observed in 34 out of the 72 examined animals (47.22%). The influence of Pearsonema sp. infection on the occurrence of eosinophilic cystitis was statistically significant in wolves (p < 0.01), which were also affected by more severe histological lesions compared to foxes.Entities:
Keywords: Pearsonema; eosinophilic cystitis; mustelids; red fox; urinary capillariosis; wolf
Year: 2021 PMID: 33919805 PMCID: PMC8070773 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10040474
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
The examined animals and the prevalence of Pearsonema sp. infection.
| Species | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| No. Positive/Examined | % | 95% CI | |
| 21/28 | 75.00 | 58.96–91.04 | |
| 16/29 | 55.17 | 37.07–73.27 | |
| Total | 37/57 | 64.91 | 52.52–77.30 |
| 1/3 | 33.33 | 0–86.68 | |
| 1/10 | 10.00 | 0–28.59 | |
| 0/2 | 0 | 0–0 | |
| Total | 2/15 | 13.33 | 0–30.54 |
| Total | 39/72 | 54.17 | 42.66–65.68 |
Figure 1Pearsonema plica. The posterior end of male parasites. Arrows indicate the characteristic triangular caudal ala. (a) lateral view; (b) dorsal view.
Figure 2The gross lesions of the urinary bladders observed in the infected animals. (a) Wolf: congested areas of mucosal surface; histologically, moderate eosinophilic cystitis was observed (see Figure 3b); (b) wolf: congested areas in the body of the bladder and raised hemorrhagic nodules in the area around the urethral opening; histologically, hyperplasia of the lymphoid nodules, along with perinodular hemorrhages in the mucosa and severe eosinophilic cystitis were observed (see Figure 3c).
Figure 3Histologically, mild to severe eosinophilic cystitis was observed in the infected animals. (a) Red fox: mild eosinophilic cystitis; scattered eosinophils (arrows) in the mucosal lamina propria along with lymphocytes and plasma cells; hematoxylin and eosin (HE); (b) wolf: moderate eosinophilic cystitis; eosinophils (arrows) arranged in small aggregates in the lamina propria; HE; (c) wolf: severe eosinophilic cystitis; numerous eosinophils infiltrating the mucosal lamina propria; HE.
The occurrence of eosinophilic cystitis in Pearsonema sp.-positive and -negative examined animals with grading of eosinophilic cystitis and associated histological findings. 0—absent; 1—mild; 2—moderate; 3—severe.
| Species | Eosinophilic Cystitis | Other Histological Features | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Lymphocytes | Plasma Cells | Lymphoid Nodules | |||
|
| Positive | 10 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | |||
| Negative | 6 | 1 | |||||||
| Total | 16 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 5 | ||||
| Positive | 1 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 5 | ||
| Negative | 12 | 1 | |||||||
| Total | 13 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 5 | ||
| Total | Positive | 11 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 5 | |
| Negative | 18 | 2 | |||||||
| Total | 29 | 20 | 6 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 5 | ||
|
| Positive | 1 | |||||||
| Negative | 2 | ||||||||
| Total | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| Positive | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Negative | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | |||||
| Total | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | |||||
| Positive | |||||||||
| Negative | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Total | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Total | Positive | 2 | 1 | ||||||
| Negative | 9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | |||||
| Total | 9 | 6 | 5 | 3 | |||||
|
| Positive | 11 | 20 | 6 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 5 | |
| Negative | 27 | 6 | 4 | 3 | |||||
| Total | 38 | 26 | 6 | 2 | 18 | 16 | 5 | ||
Figure 4The histological features observed in the infected animals along with eosinophilic cystitis. (a) Red fox: numerous lymphocytes and plasma cells infiltrating the lamina propria and the submucosa also visible within the blood vessels and in the perivascular areas; HE; (b) wolf: the hyperplasia of a lymphoid nodule in the submucosa and the dense infiltrate of eosinophils along with a few lymphocytes and plasma cells in the lamina propria; HE; (c) wolf: a small hemorrhage below the mucosal epithelium; HE.
Figure 5(a) Wolf: a section of an adult nematode in the lumen of urinary bladder; scattered eosinophils are visible in the lamina propria; HE; (b) European badger: a barrel-shaped egg with bipolar plugs is observed in this section; HE.
The prevalence and grading of eosinophilic cystitis in Pearsonema sp.-infected animals.
| Species | Number of C+/P+ Animals 1 | % | Cystitis Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/21 | 52.38 | 0.57 ± 0.60 | |
| 15/16 | 93.75 | 1.50 ± 0.82 | |
| Total | 26/37 | 70.27 | 0.97 ± 0.83 |
| 1/1 | 100.00 | 1.0 ± 0.00 | |
| 1/1 | 100.00 | 1.0 ± 0.00 | |
| 0 | 0.00 | N.A. 2 | |
| Total | 2/2 | 100.00 | 1.0 ± 0.00 |
| Total | 28/39 | 71.74 | 0.93 ± 0.80 |
1 C+—cystitis positive animals; P+—Pearsonema sp.-positive animals; 2 N.A.—not available.