| Literature DB >> 33919749 |
David Sánchez-Infantes1,2, Meritxell Nus3,4, Miquel Navas-Madroñal5,6, Joan Fité7, Belén Pérez8, Antonio J Barros-Membrilla9, Begoña Soto7, José Martínez-González4,6,10, Mercedes Camacho4,5,6, Cristina Rodriguez4,5,6, Ziad Mallat3, María Galán4,5,6.
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is increasing due to aging of the population and is a major cause of death among the elderly. Ultrasound screening programs are useful in early diagnosis, but aneurysm size is not always a good predictor of rupture. Our aim was to analyze the value of circulating molecules related to oxidative stress and inflammation as new biomarkers to assist the management of AAA. The markers were quantified by ELISA, and their expression in the aneurysmal wall was studied by real-time PCR and by immunostaining. Correlation analysis of the studied markers with aneurysm diameter and peak wall stress (PWS), obtained by finite element analysis, and multivariate regression analysis to assess potential confounding factors were performed. Our study shows an extensive inflammatory infiltration in the aneurysmal wall, mainly composed by T-cells, macrophages and B-cells and altered levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), IgM, IgG, CD38, GDF15, S100A4 and CD36 in plasma and in the aneurysmal tissue of AAA patients compared with controls. Circulating levels of IgG, CD38 and GDF15 positively correlated with abdominal aortic diameter, and CD38 was correlated with PWS. Our data show that altered levels of IgG, CD38 and GDF15 have potential diagnostic value in the assessment of AAA.Entities:
Keywords: abdominal aorta aneurysm; biomarkers; inflammation; oxidative stress; prognosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 33919749 PMCID: PMC8070751 DOI: 10.3390/antiox10040602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Demographics of individuals included in the study.
| mRNA | Plasma | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAA | Normal Aorta | AAA | Blood Donors | |
|
| 80 | 15 | 94 | 46 |
|
| 70 ± 6.2 | 63 ± 11.5 | 71.4 ± 6.5 | 59.9 ± 5.3 * |
|
| 5 (4) | 20 (3) | 4.3 (4) | 10.9 (5) |
|
| 63.5 ± 1.4 | - | 63.9 ± 1.4 | - |
|
| 56.3 (45) | 26.7 (4) | 63.8 (60) | - |
|
| 81.25 (66) | 40 (6) | 77.6 (73) | 19.6 (9) |
|
| 21.25 (17) | 33.3 (5) | 19.1 (18) | 23.91 (11) |
|
| 81.25 (66) | 40 (6) | 80.1 (76) | 45.7 (21) |
|
| 222 ± 74.8 | - | 222 ± 74.8 | - |
|
| - | - | 1 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.3 |
|
| - | - | 2.3 ± 0.9 | 3.5 ± 0.7 |
|
| - | - | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.3 |
|
| - | - | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 1.4 ± 0.7 |
Nominal variables are presented as %. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD. Due to the nature of normal aorta and plasma samples from donors, some of the clinical characteristics are not always recorded and infra-evaluation of them is probable. HTN, chronic hypertension; PWS, peak wall stress; TC: total cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C: low density lipoprotein-cholesterol. * p < 0.05 AAA vs. Donors.
Figure 1Immune infiltrate in AAA. (A–D) Representative images of immunostaining assays performed in abdominal aorta sections from AAA patients and donors targeting CD3 (T-lymphocyte s), CD68 (macrophages), CD19 (B-lymphocytes) and elastase (Neutrophils), respectively (n = 10; Scale bars: 50 µm). AAA (-) indicates negative control for immunohistochemistry. Arrows indicate the positively stained cells.
Figure 2Circulating levels of IgM and IgG are altered in AAA patients. (A,B) Circulating levels of IgM and IgG, respectively in AAA (n = 94) vs. healthy donors (n = 46). (C) Representative images of immunostaining assays performed in abdominal aorta sections from donors and AAA patients targeting IgGs (n = 10; scale bars: 100 µm). AAA (-) indicates negative control for immunohistochemistry. Arrows indicate the positively stained cells.
Figure 3Reactive oxygen species (ROS) circulating levels are increased in AAA patients. (A) Quantification of ROS plasma levels in AAA (n = 94) vs. healthy donors (n = 46). (B) Histograms showing the quantification of the number of positive cells per aortic area (10×). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. (C) Representative images of immunostaining assays performed in abdominal aorta sections from donors and AAA patients targeting 8-oxo-DG positive stained cells.
Figure 4CD38 and GDF15 expression and circulating levels are increased in AAA patients. (A) Human abdominal aortic mRNA levels of CD38 measured by quantitative real-time PCR and normalized to β-actin in healthy donors (n = 15) and patients (AAA) (n = 80). (B) CD38 plasma levels in AAA (n = 94) vs. healthy donors (n = 46); (C) plasma levels of GDF15 in AAA (n = 94) vs. healthy donors (n = 46). (D) Representative images of immunostaining assays performed in abdominal aorta sections from donors and AAA patients targeting CD38 (n = 10; scale bars: 100 µm). (E) Representative images of immunostaining assays performed in abdominal aorta sections targeting GDF15 (n = 0; scale bars: 100 µm). AAA (-) indicates negative control for immunohistochemistry. Arrows indicate the positively stained cells.
Figure 5S100A4 is decreased in AAA patients compared to healthy donors. (A) Plasma levels of S100A4 in AAA (n = 94) vs. healthy donors (n = 46); (B) representative Western blot analysis of S100A4 in protein lysates of abdominal aortas from AAA patients and donors (AAA: n = 15 and donors: n = 10); (C) representative images of immunostaining assays performed in abdominal aorta sections from donors and AAA patients targeting S100A4 (n = 10; scale bars: 100 µm). AAA (-) indicates negative control for immunohistochemistry. Arrows indicate the positively stained cells.
Figure 6IgG, CD38 and GDF15 circulating levels positively correlate with the AAA diameter whereas only CD38 correlates with PWS. (A) Graphs showing the correlation analysis between IgG plasma levels and AAA diameter (n = 90) and (B,C) the correlation analysis between CD38 plasma levels and AAA diameter (n = 90) or PWS values in AAA patients (n = 58). (D) Graph showing the correlation analysis between GDF15 plasma levels and AAA diameter (n = 90). The r and p-values are obtained by performing the Spearman or the Pearson correlation coefficient test. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM.