| Literature DB >> 33919630 |
Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez1,2,3, María Medrano1,3, Lide Arenaza1,3, Maria Amasene4, Maddi Osés1,2,3, Idoia Labayen1,2,3.
Abstract
Dietary habits have been linked with health in childhood. However, few studies have examined the association between healthy dietary patterns and physical fitness. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the associations of adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern (MDP) and breakfast quality with physical fitness in children. Further to this, we examined the role of physical activity in these associations. A total of 175 children (86 girls, 9.7 ± 0.3 years) participated. Adherence to MDP and breakfast quality were assessed by the KIDMED questionnaire and 24 h recall, respectively. Cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, and speed-agility were assessed. Physical activity was evaluated by wrist-worn accelerometers. Greater adherence to the MDP was related with higher cardiorespiratory fitness, lower-limbs muscular strength, and speed-agility (all β ≥ 0.189, all p ≤ 0.02). No significant associations were observed between breakfast quality and physical fitness (all p > 0.05). However, all the significant associations disappeared after adjusting for physical activity (all p > 0.05). Our study sheds light on the relevance of adhering to the MDP over physical fitness in school children. However, there is no association between breakfast quality and physical fitness. Furthermore, physical activity seems to explain, at least partially, these findings.Entities:
Keywords: cardiorespiratory fitness; diet quality; muscular strength; physical activity; speed–agility; youth
Year: 2021 PMID: 33919630 PMCID: PMC8072945 DOI: 10.3390/nu13041353
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Descriptive characteristics of the study sample.
| All | Boys | Girls | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean ± SD | N | Mean ± SD | N | Mean ± SD | |
| Age (years) | 173 | 9.7 ± 0.3 | 86 | 9.7 ± 0.3 | 87 | 9.6 ± 0.3 |
| Weight (kg) | 173 | 33.2 ± 6.6 | 86 | 33.2 ± 7.1 | 87 | 33.2 ± 6.1 |
| Height (cm) | 173 | 137.7 ± 5.6 | 86 | 137.9 ± 5.8 | 87 | 137.4 ± 5.4 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 173 | 17.4 ± 2.6 | 86 | 17.3 ± 2.7 | 87 | 17.5 ± 2.6 |
| Body fat percentage (%) | 173 | 18.7 ± 7.3 | 86 | 16.1 ± 5.1 | 87 | 21.3 ± 8.2 |
| Fat-free mass (kg) | 172 | 59.4 ± 5.8 | 85 | 61.3 ± 3.8 | 87 | 57.5 ± 6.8 |
| Weight status (%) *: | ||||||
| Normal weight | 126 | 72.8% | 63 | 73.3% | 63 | 72.4% |
| Overweight/Obese | 47 | 27.2% | 23 | 26.7% | 24 | 27.6% |
| Diet: | ||||||
| Mediterranean dietary pattern | 130 | 5.9 ± 1.6 | 63 | 6.1 ±1.6 | 67 | 5.8 ±1.7 |
| Breakfast quality index | 175 | 3.9 ± 1.1 | 86 | 3.9 ± 1.2 | 89 | 3.8 ± 1.0 |
| Physical fitness: | ||||||
| Cardiorespiratory fitness (laps) | 172 | 39.5 ± 20.3 | 84 | 48.5 ± 21.6 | 88 | 31.1 ± 14.6 |
| Upper-limbs muscular strength (kg) | 173 | 15.1 ± 3.0 | 85 | 15.7 ± 3.4 | 88 | 14.6 ± 2.5 |
| Lower-limbs muscular strength (cm) | 172 | 134.5 ± 19.8 | 84 | 141.0 ± 19.4 | 88 | 128.2 ± 18.6 |
| Speed–agility (sec) | 172 | 12.3 ± 0.8 | 84 | 12.0 ± 0.7 | 88 | 12.6 ± 0.8 |
| Physical activity (min/day) †: | ||||||
| Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity | 161 | 117.6 ± 28.8 | 79 | 121.0 ± 27.5 | 82 | 114.9 ± 29.6 |
| Wearing time (awake) | 161 | 828.3 ± 41.6 | 79 | 831.3 ± 43.1 | 82 | 825.2 ± 40.4 |
SD = Standard deviation. Weight status was presented as frequency and percentage. The rest of the sections were presented as mean ± standard deviation. * Classified according to Cole et al. [17]. † Classified according to Chandler et al. [24] cut-off points for non-dominant wrist.
Linear regression analysis between the Mediterranean dietary pattern and breakfast quality with physical fitness components.
| Mediterranean Dietary Pattern | Breakfast Quality Index | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | B |
| β | B |
| |
| Model 1: | ||||||
| Cardiorespiratory fitness | 0.189 | 2.416 | 0.019 | 0.058 | 1.062 | 0.406 |
| Upper-limbs muscular strength | −0.089 | −0.164 | 0.312 | 0.036 | 0.098 | 0.628 |
| Lower-limbs muscular strength | 0.196 | 2.542 | 0.017 | 0.115 | 2.058 | 0.116 |
| Speed–agility * | −0.210 | −0.117 | 0.010 | −0.050 | −0.038 | 0.494 |
| Model 2: | ||||||
| Cardiorespiratory fitness | 0.126 | 1.564 | 0.116 | 0.009 | 0.158 | 0.898 |
| Upper-limbs muscular strength | −0.160 | −0.289 | 0.071 | 0.089 | 0.231 | 0.247 |
| Lower-limbs muscular strength | 0.141 | 1.796 | 0.091 | 0.093 | 1.695 | 0.207 |
| Speed–agility * | −0.121 | −0.061 | 0.131 | −0.017 | −0.012 | 0.809 |
Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and accelerometer awake wearing time. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was classified according to Chandler et al. [24] cut-off points for non-dominant wrist. β = Beta standardized coefficient. B = Non-standardized beta coefficient. * In the speed–agility test, less time indicates a faster runner, so that a lower score indicates better performance.
Figure 1Differences between low and high adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern and physical fitness components in children (Panel A: cardiorespiratory fitness, Panel B: upper-limbs muscular strength, Panel C: lower-limbs muscular strength, and Panel D: speed–agility).
Figure 2Differences between low and high breakfast quality and physical fitness components in children (Panel A: cardiorespiratory fitness, Panel B: upper-limbs muscular strength, Panel C: lower-limbs muscular strength, and Panel D: speed–agility).