| Literature DB >> 33919340 |
Muhammad Yasir Ali1, Tayyaba Naseem2, Muhammad Arshad3, Ijaz Ashraf4, Muhammad Rizwan5, Muhammad Tahir6, Misbah Rizwan5, Samy Sayed7, Muhammad Irfan Ullah3, Rashad Rasool Khan8, Muhammad Bilal Amir1, Mingzhen Pan1, Tong-Xian Liu1.
Abstract
The green peach aphid, Myzus persicae Sulzer (Hemiptera: Aphididae), a polyphagous insect pest is a major threat to a wide range of crops worldwide. Aiming to evaluate the life history traits of M. persicae, feeding on different host plants, we used five vegetables: cabbage, Brassica oleracea (Brassicaceae); chinese cabbage, B. rapa (Brassicaceae); chili pepper, Capsicum annum (Solanaceae); crown daisy, Chrysanthemum coronarium (Asteraceae); and eggplant, Solanum melongena (Solanaceae). TWOSEX-MSchart software was used for the statistical analysis about the age-stage, two-sex life table theory. The highest fecundity (69.65 individuals) rate of M. persicae, intrinsic rate of increase (r = 0.425 d-1), finite rate of increase (λ = 1.531 d-1), net reproductive rate (R0 = 69.65 offspring), and shortest mean generation time (T = 9.964 d) were recorded on the chili pepper plant. Whereas, lower fitness occurred on cabbage. The findings attained from population growth parameters indicate that chili pepper is the most susceptible plant, while cabbage is resistant to aphids. Population projection results also supported this statement, as the final total population size on cabbage was significantly lower than other plants. The reported information would be useful for devising integrated pest management programs, particularly those involving M. persicae. This information also suggests the adaptability of M. persicae causing economic damage to these vegetable cultivars.Entities:
Keywords: Myzus persicae; age-stage two sex life table; insect-plant interaction; vegetables
Year: 2021 PMID: 33919340 PMCID: PMC8143353 DOI: 10.3390/insects12050375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Development period (Mean ± SE) of M. persicae raised on five different hosts.
| Life Stage |
| Cabbage |
| Chinese Cabbage |
| Crown Daisy |
| Eggplant |
| Pepper |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1 | 54 | 2.42 ± 0.16 a | 54 | 1.50 ± 0.09 b | 54 | 1.63 ± 0.09 b | 54 | 1.37 ± 0.07 c | 52 | 1.31 ± 0.08 c |
| N2 | 38 | 3.26 ± 0.14 a | 52 | 1.50 ± 0.07 b | 54 | 1.41 ± 0.07 b | 54 | 1.37 ± 0.07 b | 52 | 1.31 ± 0.06 c |
| N3 | 32 | 1.81 ± 0.07 a | 52 | 1.31 ± 0.06 b | 54 | 1.33 ± 0.06 b | 54 | 1.26 ± 0.07 b | 52 | 1.54 ± 0.08 a |
| N4 | 28 | 2.00 ± 0.00 a | 52 | 1.65 ± 0.09 b | 52 | 1.85 ± 0.05 a | 54 | 1.48 ± 0.07 c | 52 | 1.46 ± 0.08 c |
| Preadult | 9.36 ± 0.23 a | 5.96 ± 0.16 bc | 6.19 ± 0.07 b | 5.48 ± 0.12 c | 5.62 ± 0.11 c | |||||
| Adult longevity | 28 | 13.7 ± 0.41 a | 52 | 12.7 ± 0.50 a | 52 | 13.8 ± 0.28 a | 54 | 12.8 ± 0.48 a | 52 | 13.2 ± 0.52 a |
| Total Longevity | 14.1 ± 1.33 b | 18.1 ± 0.67 a | 19.5 ± 0.46 a | 18.3 ± 0.47 a | 18.8 ± 0.518 a | |||||
| Fecundity | 36.5 ± 1.26 c | 60.6 ± 2.68 a | 47.1 ± 0.91 bc | 54.3 ± 2.16 b | 69.6 ± 2.42 a | |||||
| TPRP | 9.71 ± 0.29 a | 6.00 ± 0.16 b | 6.35 ± 0.09 b | 5.52 ± 0.13 c | 5.62 ± 0.11 c | |||||
| APRP | 0.36 ± 0.24 a | 0.04 ± 0.03 b | 0.15 ± 0.05 b | 0.04 ± 0.03 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 c | |||||
| Ovi. days | 12.1 ± 0.55 a | 12.3 ± 0.52 a | 13.6 ± 0.30 a | 12.4 ± 0.05 a | 12.9 ± 0.50 a | |||||
| Preadult survival rate ( | 0.51 ± 0.06 b | 0.96 ± 0.02 a | 0.96 ± 0.02 a | 1.00 ± 0.00 a | 1.00 ± 0.00 a |
N1–N4 indicate the nymphal instar, means sharing similar letters in each row are not significantly different at p > 0.05, n = numbers of individual M. persicae that completed their development.
Population parameters (Means ± SE) of M. persicae reared on five different hosts.
| Parameters | Host Plants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cabbage | Chinese Cabbage | Crown Daisy | Eggplant | Pepper | |
| Net reproductive rate ( | 18.9 ± 2.57 d | 58.4 ± 2.99 b | 45.3 ± 1.48 c | 54.3 ± 2.14 b,c | 69.6 ± 2.38 a |
| Intrinsic rate of increase ( | 0.21 ± 0.01 c | 0.41 ± 0.01 a | 0.34 ± 0.01 b | 0.42 ± 0.01 a | 0.42 ± 0.01 a |
| Finite rate of increase ( | 1.23 ± 0.01 c | 1.51 ± 0.01 a | 1.41 ± 0.06 b | 1.52 ± 0.12 a | 1.53 ± 0.01 a |
| Mean generation time ( | 14.2 ± 0.40 a | 9.83 ± 0.21 b | 10.9 ± 0.12 b | 9.43 ± 0.16 b | 9.96 ± 0.17 b |
Means sharing similar letters in each row are not significantly different at p > 0.05.
Figure 1Age-stage-specific survival rate (s) of Myzus persicae fed on five host plants: cabbage (A), chinese cabbage (B), crown daisy (C), eggplant (D), and pepper (E).
Figure 2Age-stage-specific life expectance (e) of Myzus persicae fed on five host plants: cabbage (A), chinese cabbage (B), crown daisy (C), eggplant (D), and pepper (E).
Figure 3Age-stage-specific reproductive rate (v) of Myzus persicae fed on five host plants: cabbage (A), chinese cabbage (B), crown daisy (C), eggplant (D), and pepper (E).
Figure 4Age-specific survival rate (l), age-stage-specific fecundity (f), age-specific fecundity (m), and age-specific fertility (l) of Myzus persicae fed on five host plants: cabbage (A), chinese cabbage (B), crown daisy (C), eggplant (D), and pepper (E).
Figure 5Population projection of Myzus persicae showing the changes in the age-stage structure fed on five host plants: cabbage (A), chinese cabbage (B), crown daisy (C), eggplant (D), and pepper (E).