| Literature DB >> 33919302 |
Chong-Yin Huang1,2, Kun Yang1,2, Jun-Jie Cao1,2, Zi-Yuan Wang1,2, Yong Wu1,2, Zhi-Liang Sun1,2, Zhao-Ying Liu1,2.
Abstract
Some naturalphytogenic feed additives, which contain several active compounds, have been shown to be effective alternatives to traditional antibiotics. Gelsemium elegans (G. elegans) is a whole grass in the family Loganiaceae. It is a known toxic plant widely distributed in China and has been used as a traditional Chinese herbal medicine for many years to treat neuropathic pain, rheumatoid pain, inflammation, skin ulcers, and cancer. However, G. elegans not only is nontoxic to animals such as pigs and sheep but also has an obvious growth-promoting effect. To our knowledge, the internal mechanism of the influence of G. elegans on the animal body is still unclear. The goal of this work is to evaluate the metabolic consequences of feeding piglets G. elegans for 45 days based on the combination of transcriptomics and metabolomics. According to growth measurement and evaluation, compared with piglets fed a complete diet, adding 20 g/kg G. elegans powder to the basal diet of piglets significantly reduced the feed conversion ratio. Results of the liver transcriptome suggest that glycine and cysteine-related regulatory pathways, including the MAPK signaling pathway and the mTOR signaling pathway, were extensively altered in G. elegans-induced piglets. Plasma metabolomics identified 21 and 18 differential metabolites (p < 0.05) in the plasma of piglets in the positive and negative ion modes, respectively, between G. elegans exposure and complete diet groups. The concentrations of glycine and its derivatives and N-acetylcysteine were higher in the G. elegans exposure group than in the complete diet group.This study demonstrated that G. elegans could be an alternative to antibiotics that improves the immune function of piglets, and the latent mechanism of G. elegans may be related to various signaling pathways, including the MAPK signaling pathway and the PPAR signaling pathway.Entities:
Keywords: Gelsemium elegans; metabolism; transcriptome; weaned piglet
Year: 2021 PMID: 33919302 PMCID: PMC8143298 DOI: 10.3390/ani11051192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Effect of G. elegans powder on the growth performance of piglets.
| Items | Treatment | SEM 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | L | |||
| Num | 10 | 30 | - | - |
| Average feed intake, kg | 13.58 | 9.02 | 0.165 | <0.001 |
| Average gain, kg | 5.32 | 4.06 | 0.038 | <0.001 |
| Feed conversion ratio | 2.55 | 2.22 | 1.176 | <0.001 |
1 SEM = Standard error of mean. 2 L = Linear effect of G. elegans.
Serum chemical parameters of the control group and the G. elegans-treated group.
| Items | Treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | |||
| WBC, 109/L | 18.13 | 25.22 | 0.040 |
| LYMPH, 109/L | 8.51 | 12.13 | 0.023 |
| EOS, 109/L | 1.14 | 1.76 | 0.058 |
| LYMPH, % | 47.01 | 48.63 | 0.304 |
| EOS, % | 8.07 | 7.07 | 0.667 |
| RBC, 1012/L | 7.919 | 9.188 | 0.852 |
| HGB, g/L | 122.33 | 140 | 0.504 |
| MCV, fL | 81.75 | 78.58 | 0.027 |
| MCH, pg | 16.3 | 18.7 | 0.611 |
| MCHC, g/L | 202 | 236.5 | 0.287 |
| RDW_CV, % | 16.09 | 16.62 | 0.413 |
| RDW_SD, fL | 52.6 | 52.1 | 0.077 |
| HCT, % | 64.82 | 71.77 | 0.163 |
| PLT, 109/L | 256.2 | 984 | 0.785 |
| MPV, fL | 10.56 | 11.23 | 0.096 |
| PDW | 14.24 | 15.08 | 0.106 |
| PCT, % | 0.273 | 1.111 | 0.186 |
WBC (white blood cell count), LYMPH (lymphocyte count), EOS (eosinophil count), RBC (red blood cell count), HGB (hemoglobin concentration), MCV (mean corpuscular volume), MCH (mean corpuscular hemoglobin), MCHC (mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration), RDW (red cell distribution width), HCT (hematocrits), PLT (platelet count), MPV (mean platelet volume), PDW (platelet distribution width), PCT (plateletcrit).
Figure 1Differences in the expression levels of genes and metabolism-related alterations at the transcriptional level in piglet liver after G. elegans feeding. (A) PCA score plot of the genes identified from the control and G. elegans-treated group comparison. (B) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes. Log2 fold changes in gene expression based on RNA-seq in the control and G. elegans-treated groups, and the corresponding significance values are displayed as log10 (p value). The transverse and vertical dotted lines indicate the cutoff value for differential expression (p < 0.05 and |log2 fold changes| > 1). In total, 95 and 104 genes with increased (red) or decreased (blue) expression levels induced by G. elegans exposure were identified. (C) Hierarchical clustering based on the DEGs related to metabolism.
Figure 2GO classification and pathway enrichment results of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between liver tissues of the G. elegans-treated group and the control group. (A) GO classification of the DEGs. (B) Pathway enrichment results of the DEGs. The X axis represents the enrichment factor value, and the Y axis represents the pathway name. The color represents the corrected p value (p adjust < 0.05), and the size of the dots represents the number of genes. GeneRatio represents the proportion of enriched genes to background genes.
Results of quantitative qRT-PCR validation.
| Gene Symbol | Tissue | RNA-Seq | qRT-PCR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fold Change | Fold Change | ||||
| Atp2b3 | Liver | <0.001 | 3.57 | 0.014 | 2.39 |
| Mat2a | Liver | <0.001 | 2.18 | 0.008 | 1.70 |
| Chdh | Liver | 0.026 | 2.35 | 0.024 | 1.48 |
| Slc20a2 | Ileum | 0.006 | 2.05 | 0.010 | 1.89 |
| Slc28a1 | Ileum | 0.008 | 2.02 | 0.028 | 2.02 |
| Mt3 | Ileum | <0.001 | 3.49 | 0.008 | 3.75 |
Figure 3The PLS-DA for scatterplot and sorting verification plot in positive and negative mode. The scatterplot (A,B) was obtained. The abscissa is the score of the sample on the first principal component. The ordinate is the score of the sample on the second principal component. R2Y represents the interpretation rate of the second principal component of the model, and Q2Y represents the prediction rate of the model. In the sorting test (C,D), the abscissa represents the correlation between the random group Y and the original group Y, and the ordinate represents the score of R2 and Q2.
The positive ion pattern of differentially expressed metabolites with VIP > 1 and p < 0.05 in the plasma of piglets exposed to G. elegans based on ANOVA.
| Metabolites | VIP | log2(Fold Change) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methylsulfonylmethane | 2.24 | 2.44 | <0.001 |
| 3-(4-Hydroxy-5-oxo-3-phenyl-2,5-dihydro-2-furanyl) propanoic acid | 1.46 | 1.58 | <0.001 |
| Visnagin | 1.53 | 1.66 | <0.001 |
| Beta-Naphthoxyacetic Acid | 1.57 | 1.70 | <0.001 |
| Menadiol | 1.41 | 1.52 | <0.001 |
| N-Feruloylserotonin | 2.29 | 2.52 | <0.001 |
| Dibenzo-1,4-dioxin | 1.45 | 1.55 | 0.001 |
| (-)-Akuammicine | 1.98 | 2.20 | 0.001 |
| 1-Naphthol | 1.38 | 1.51 | 0.002 |
| 4-Methylene-2-oxoglutarate | 1.45 | 1.58 | 0.002 |
| 5-Formyl-2-furoic acid | 1.45 | 1.60 | 0.003 |
| N-Acetyl-L-phenylalanine | 1.66 | 1.75 | 0.003 |
| Menadione | 1.18 | 1.32 | 0.005 |
| Phenylacetylglycine | 1.18 | 1.25 | 0.006 |
| Indole-3-carbidol | 1.47 | 1.53 | 0.010 |
| Furathiazole | 1.32 | 1.39 | 0.016 |
| 1-Stearoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoserine | 1.44 | 1.72 | 0.023 |
| Spirodiclofen | 2.35 | 2.35 | 0.028 |
| Pelargonidin | 1.19 | −1.20 | 0.030 |
| 2,5-Dimethyl-4-ethoxy-3(2H)-furanone | 1.11 | 1.35 | 0.041 |
| 7-alpha-Hydroxy-3-oxochol-4-en-24-oic acid | 1.31 | 1.47 | 0.047 |
The results of differentially expressed metabolites in negative ion mode with VIP > 1 and p < 0.05 in plasma of piglets exposed to G. elegans based on ANOVA.
| Metabolites | VIP | log2(Fold Change) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maslinic acid | 2.54 | 2.19 | 0.001 |
| 10-Acetyl-9-hydroxy-7,7-dimethyl-2,6,6a,7,11a,11b-hexahydro-11H-pyrrolo[1′,2′:2,3]isoindolo[4,5,6-cd]indol-11-one | 2.23 | 1.99 | 0.003 |
| Adipic acid | 2.17 | 1.94 | 0.004 |
| 4-[(2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy]-4-oxobutanoic acid | 1.14 | −0.90 | 0.008 |
| Glycine | 1.23 | 1.02 | 0.009 |
| Imazamethabenz | 1.39 | 1.13 | 0.009 |
| p-Tolyl beta- | 1.50 | 1.23 | 0.011 |
| Phenylacetylglycine | 1.45 | 1.18 | 0.011 |
| (+)-CP 55,940 | 1.71 | 1.42 | 0.011 |
| 2.08 | 1.89 | 0.013 | |
| (-)-CP 55,940 | 2.00 | 1.65 | 0.013 |
| Cascarillin | 1.07 | −0.81 | 0.020 |
| Picrasin C | 1.14 | −0.84 | 0.026 |
| 10-[4-(2,4,4-Trimethyl-2-pentanyl) phenoxy]-1-decanol | 2.08 | −1.48 | 0.038 |
| N-Acetyl-L-cysteine | 1.06 | 0.95 | 0.041 |
| 4-Methylphenol | 1.47 | 1.16 | 0.043 |
| Actinoquinol | 1.11 | −0.81 | 0.046 |
| Glycol stearate | 2.35 | −1.79 | 0.49 |
Figure 4Network of genes and metabolites regulated by G. elegans. Network visualization of the amino acid metabolism (A) and lipid metabolism pathways (B) was performed using Cytoscape software (version 3.5.1) and MetScape software (version 3.1.3). The node colors in this figure correspond to absolute maximum log2 fold changes; significant increases and decreases in differential metabolites and differentially expressed genes are highlighted in red and blue, respectively.