| Literature DB >> 33918847 |
Omar Alagha1, Noureddine Ouerfelli2,3, Hafedh Kochkar2,3, Munirah A Almessiere4, Yassine Slimani4, Ayyar Manikandan5, Abdulhadi Baykal6, Ahmed Mostafa7, Mukarram Zubair1, Mohammad H Barghouthi1.
Abstract
Penicillin G is an old and widely used antibiotic. Its persistence in the environment started to appear in many environmental samples and food chains. The removal of these emerging pollutants has been a challenging task for scientists in the last decades. The photocatalytic properties of Cd2+ doped Manganese- Zinc NSFs with chemical formula (Mn0.5Zn0.5)[CdxFe2-x]O4 (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 0.05) NSFs are herein evaluated. The Manganese- Zinc N.S.F.s nanomaterials were deeply characterized, utilizing UV-Vis (reflectance) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, N2 adsorption isotherm measurements, and S.E.M., SEM-EDX mapping, and T.E.M. The Kinetic model for the photodegradation of penicillin G (as a model molecule) is investigated using visible light as a source of energy. The kinetic study shows that our results fit well with the modified pseudo-first-order model. The Pen G degradation are 88.73%, 66.65%, 44.70%, 37.62% and 24.68% for x = 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2 and 0.1, respectively, against 14.68% for the free Cd spinel sample. The pseudo-rate constant is bandgap dependent. From the intra-diffusion rate constant (Kd), we developed an intra-diffusion time (τ) model, which decreases exponentially as a function of (x) and mainly shows the existence of three different domains versus cadmium coordination in spinel ferrite samples. Hence, Cadmium's presence generates spontaneous polarization with a strong opportunity to monitor the charge separation and then open the route to a new generation of "assisted" photocatalysts under visible light.Entities:
Keywords: emerging pollutants; kinetic modeling; mixed spinel ferrites; nanoparticles; penicillin; photodegradation; wastewater
Year: 2021 PMID: 33918847 PMCID: PMC8070312 DOI: 10.3390/nano11040970
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1XRD powder patterns of (Mn0.5Zn0.5)[CdFe2−]O4 (x ≤ 0.05) NSFs.
Figure 2SEM and TEM images of (Mn0.5Zn0.5)[CdFe2−]O4 (x = 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5) NSFs.
Figure 3EDX and elemental mapping of (Mn0.5Zn0.5)[CdFe2−]O4 (x = 0.2) NSFs.
Textural properties of (Mn0.5Zn0.5)[CdFe2-]O4 (x ≤ 0.05) NSFs.
| (Mn0.5Zn0.5)[Cd | x | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | |
| Surface Area (m²/g) | 138 | 101.5 | 108 | 101 | 69 | 43 |
| Pore Volume (cc/g) | 0.180 | 0.190 | 0.210 | 0.196 | 0.150 | 0.086 |
| Pore diameter (Å) | 58 | 72 | 84 | 72 | 82 | 82 |
Figure 4Nitrogen physisorption isotherm plots of; (a) x0, (b) x01, (c) x02, (d) x03, (e) x04, and (f) x05.
Figure 5Tauc plots of (Mn0.5Zn0.5)[CdFe2-]O4 (x ≤ 0.05) NSFs. Extrapolating the straight portion of the plot to the photon energy axis at the 〚(αhυ)〛^2 = 0 determines the value of the optical band gap.
C/C0 and Pen G degradation onto (Mn0.5Zn0.5)[CdFe2-]O4 (x ≤ 0.05) NSFs.
|
| 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t/min | C/C0 | |||||
| 0 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
| 10 | 0.95262 | 0.93157 | 0.91825 | 0.87202 | 0.76098 | 0.63343 |
| 20 | 0.94483 | 0.90611 | 0.86885 | 0.82652 | 0.66659 | 0.48658 |
| 30 | 0.93155 | 0.88672 | 0.84257 | 0.81391 | 0.62154 | 0.45549 |
| 60 | 0.90482 | 0.84761 | 0.77303 | 0.71679 | 0.49868 | 0.35593 |
| 90 | 0.89377 | 0.82376 | 0.70142 | 0.67588 | 0.48610 | 0.29267 |
| 120 | 0.87756 | 0.79047 | 0.67476 | 0.61014 | 0.45405 | 0.16191 |
| 180 | 0.85318 | 0.75315 | 0.62379 | 0.55294 | 0.33335 | 0.11268 |
| Degradation | 14.68 | 24.68 | 37.62 | 44.70 | 66.65 | 88.73 |
Figure 6Variation of C/C0 vs. time for (Mn0.5Zn0.5)[CdFe2−]O4 (x = 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5) NSFs.
Photocatalytic properties of (Mn0.5Zn0.5)[CdFe2-]O4 (x ≤ 0.05) NSFs.
|
| 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t/min | t0.5/min0.5 | ln(C/C0) | |||||
| 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| 10 | 3.1623 | −0.04854 | −0.07088 | −0.085286 | −0.13694 | −0.273 | −0.4566 |
| 20 | 4.4721 | −0.05675 | −0.0985 | −0.14059 | −0.19053 | −0.406 | −0.7203 |
| 30 | 5.4772 | −0.07091 | −0.12023 | −0.17130 | −0.20591 | −0.476 | −0.7863 |
| 60 | 7.7460 | −0.10002 | −0.1653 | −0.25744 | −0.33297 | −0.695 | −1.0330 |
| 90 | 9.4868 | −0.11231 | −0.1938 | −0.35465 | −0.39174 | −0.721 | −1.2287 |
| 120 | 10.954 | −0.13061 | −0.23513 | −0.39340 | −0.49407 | −0.789 | −1.8207 |
| 180 | 13.416 | −0.15879 | −0.28349 | −0.47195 | −0.59251 | −1.098 | −2.1832 |
| 0.92346 | 1.6555 | 2.8425 | 3.4763 | 6.1409 | 12.4751 | ||
| R | 0.93616 | 0.94957 | 0.96295 | 0.96232 | 0.93675 | 0.96706 | |
Figure 7Variation of ln C/C0 vs. time for (Mn0.5Zn0.5)[CdFe2-]O4 (x = 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5) NSFs.
Figure 8Variation of ln k1 and lnk1’ vs. cadmium coordination in NSFs.
Figure 9The variation of the adjustable parameters a1 (a) and a2 (b) vs. Cd coordination (x).
Figure 10(a) ln(C/C0) for different as a function t1/2 and (b) Kd vs. cadmium coordination in NSFs.
Figure 11Variation of intra-diffusion time τ vs. cadmium coordination in NSFs.
Figure 12Variation of ln (τ/τ0) as a function of (x).
Figure 13Variation of pseudo rate constant (k1) and modified pseudo-rate constant (a1) vs. bandgap energy.