| Literature DB >> 33918457 |
Andrea Sambri1,2, Emilia Caldari2, Michele Fiore3, Riccardo Zucchini3, Claudio Giannini3, Maria Giulia Pirini2, Paolo Spinnato3, Alberta Cappelli2, Davide Maria Donati1,3, Massimiliano De Paolis2.
Abstract
Adequacy of margins must take into consideration both the resection margin width (quantity) and anatomic barrier (quality). There are several classification schemes for reporting surgical resection margin status for soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Most of the studies regarding treatment outcomes in STS included all histologic grades and histological subtypes, which include infiltrative and non-infiltrative subtypes and are very heterogeneous in terms of both histologic characteristics and treatment modalities (adjuvant treatments or not). This lack of consistency makes it difficult to compare results from study to study. Therefore, there is a great need for evidence-based standardization concerning the width of resection margins. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the literature on margins, and to highlight the need for a uniform description of the margin status for patients with STS. Patient cases should be discussed at multidisciplinary tumor boards and treatments should be individualized to clinical and demographic characteristics, which must include also a deep knowledge of specific histotypes behaviors, particularly infiltrative ones.Entities:
Keywords: classification; infiltrative; local recurrence; margins; soft tissue sarcoma
Year: 2021 PMID: 33918457 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071687
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639