| Literature DB >> 33918070 |
Adrianna Wierzbicka1, Dorota Mańkowska-Wierzbicka2, Stanisław Cieślewicz3, Marta Stelmach-Mardas1, Marcin Mardas3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy, as a method of treatment of cervical and uterine cancers, may induce severe late-onset vaginal side effects. Unfortunately, little evidence on the management of adverse effects has been presented. This study aimed to evaluate the available interventions which reduce symptoms of vaginitis and vaginal atrophy by improving dyspareunia, mucosal inflammation, vaginal pH and vaginal dryness in women who have undergone brachytherapy or radiotherapy due to uterine or cervical malignancies.Entities:
Keywords: brachytherapy; cervical cancer; endometrial cancer; radiotherapy; reproductive health; vagina; vaginal atrophy; women’s health; women’s mental health
Year: 2021 PMID: 33918070 PMCID: PMC8070443 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18083932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flow chart of the databases searches on the influence of vaginal interventions on vaginitis and vaginal atrophy after brachytherapy or radiotherapy in patients with malignant endometrial or cervical tumors.
Characteristics of enrolled population (n = 376).
| Source, | Country | Trial Type | Sample Size ( | Age (Years) | Type of Cancer | Staging * | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Intervention Group | Control Group | Intervention Group | Control Group | Intervention Group | ||||
| Delia et al. 2018 [ | Italy | RCT | 89 | 88 | 50.3 ± 10.3 | 49.7 ± 9.2 | Cervical cancer | CC IB–IIA | CC IB–IIA |
| Dinicola et al. 2015 [ | Italy | PRS | 23 | 22 | 38 ± 6 | 38 ± 6 | Cervical cancer | CC IIB–IIIB | CC IIB–IIIB |
| Galuppi et al. 2011 [ | Italy | RCT | 29 | 33 | 66 ± 13.6 | 67 ± 12.3 | Endometrial cancerCervical cancer | EC IC 11 | EC IC 9 |
| EC IIB 3 | EC IIB 4 | ||||||||
| EC III 1 | EC III 1 | ||||||||
| CC IB 18 | CC IB 15 | ||||||||
| Pitkin et al. 1971 [ | USA | RCT | 49 | 43 | 49.87 ± 13.73 | 50.04 ± 13.66 | Cervical cancer | CC I 9 | CC I 10 |
| CC II 14 | CC II 12 | ||||||||
| CC III 26 | CC III 21 | ||||||||
| CC IV 1 | |||||||||
RCT, randomized controlled trial; PRS, Prospective randomized Study; EC, Endometrial cancer; CC, cervical cancer; * classified according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d’Obstétrique; FIGO).
Intervention methods—outcomes of clinical studies.
| Study Included | Intervention Time (weeks) | Intervention Dose (mg) | Used Intervention | Method of Evaluation | Key Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delia et al. 2018 [ | 5 | 5 | HA | gynecological inspection, | ↓ vaginal dryness |
| 1 | Vitamin E | ||||
| 1 | Vitamin A | ||||
| Dinicola et al. 2015 [ | 16 | 5 | HA | biopsy of the vaginal vault, | ↓ dyspareunia |
| 1 | Vitamin E | ||||
| 1 | Vitamin A | ||||
| Galuppi et al. 2011 [ | 14–17 | 500 | alpha-tocopherol acetate | punch biopsy, RTOGSS, VAS, | ↓ mucosal inflammation |
| Pitkin et al. 1971 [ | 20–40 | 7.8 | dienestrol | gynecological inspection, | ↓ dyspareunia |
VAS, visual analog scale; RTOGSS, Radiation Therapy Oncology Groups Scoring System.
Figure 2Risk of bias graph: Review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Effect of intervention on vaginal parameters.
| Source, Year | Dyspareunia | Dryness | Inflammation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Control after | Intervention | Control after | Intervention after | Control after | ||||
| Delia et al. 2018 [ | 2.46 ± 0.50 | 0.74 ± 0.43 | 0.63 ± 0.33 | 2.43 ± 0.50 | 0.77 ± 0.25 | 2.47 ± 0.50 | |||
| Dinicola et al. 2015 [ | 23% | 69% | n/a | n/a | n/a | 23% | 75% | ||
| Galuppi et al. 2011 [ | 1.33 ± 1.55 | 2.07 ± 1.77 | 1.17 ± 0.80 | 0.62 ± 0.62 | 1.64 ± 0.65 | 2.21 ± 0.80 * | |||
| Pitkin et al. 1971 [ | 23.1% | 44.4% | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
* p < 0.05.
Effect of intervention on vaginal parameters.
| Source, Year | Bleeding | Fibrosis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention after | Control after | Intervention after | Control after | |||
| Delia et al. 2018 [ | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Dinicola et al. 2015 [ | 9% | 43% | 18% | 56% | ||
| Galuppi et al. 2011 [ | n/a | n/a | n/a | 2.00 ± 1.15 | 2.50 ± 0.52 | |
| Pitkin et al. 1971 [ | 79.6% | 27% | n/a | n/a | n/a | |