| Literature DB >> 33917966 |
Carmen Llorente-Barroso1, Olga Kolotouchkina2, Luis Mañas-Viniegra1.
Abstract
(1) Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has been especially hard on the elderly owing to their particular vulnerability to the virus. Their confinement to prevent the spread of the virus resulted in social isolation, often linked to the unwanted loneliness that hinders their emotional well-being. The enabling capacity of ICT (Information and Communication Technology) to overcome the negative effects of this isolation requires special attention. The purpose of this research is to understand the impact of the use of ICT on the emotional well-being of elderly people during their confinement. (2)Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; ICT (Information and Communication Technology); digital communication; elderly; emotional well-being; focus group; pandemic; social isolation; unwanted loneliness
Year: 2021 PMID: 33917966 PMCID: PMC8068368 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18083923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Focus groups setting (n = 27).
| Age | Sex | Confinement | Residence | Occupation | Studies | Digital | COVID | Death | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | |||||||||
| GAS1 | 77 | F | Alone | A Coruña | Retired | Graduate | Medium | No | No |
| GAS2 | 72 | M | Alone | Madrid | Retired | PhD | Very High | No | No |
| GAS3 | 69 | F | Alone | Majadahonda | Active | Graduate | Very High | No | Friend |
| GAS4 | 67 | M | Alone | Barcelona | Active | Graduate | Very High | No | Friend |
| GAS5 | 61 | F | Alone | Oviedo | Active | PhD | Very High | No | Father-in-law |
| GAS6 | 60 | M | Alone | Pobla de Vallbona | Active | PhD | Very High | No | No |
| Group B | |||||||||
| GBS7 | 77 | M | Alone | Las Rozas | Retired | Graduate | High | No answer | No |
| GBS8 | 75 | F | Alone | Madrid | Retired | Certified | High | No | No |
| GBS9 | 74 | F | Alone | Madrid | Retired | Graduate | High | Yes | No |
| GBS10 | 72 | F | Alone | Madrid | Retired | Graduate | High | No | No |
| GBS11 | 71 | F | Alone | Madrid | Retired | Certified | Medium | No | No |
| GBS12 | 69 | F | Alone | Madrid | Retired | Graduate | Very High | No | Cousin |
| GBS13 | 61 | F | Alone | Madrid | Active | Graduate | High | No | No |
| Group C | |||||||||
| GCS14 | 73 | F | Spouse | Guadalajara | Retired | Secondary | Medium | Yes | No |
| GCS15 | 70 | F | Spouse | Guadalajara | Retired | Secondary | Medium–Low | Yes | Cousin |
| GCS16 | 69 | M | Spouse | Guadalajara | Retired | Primary | Low | No | Cousin |
| GCS17 | 66 | F | Spouse | Guadalajara | Retired | Graduate | High | No | No |
| GCS18 | 66 | M | Congregation | Guadalajara | Active | Graduate | Medium–Low | Yes | Brother- in-law |
| GCS19 | 61 | F | Spouse/Son | Guadalajara | Active | Graduate | Medium | Yes | Spouse |
| Group D | |||||||||
| GDS20 | 67 | M | Spouse | Roda de | Retired | Primary | Low | No | No |
| GDS21 | 66 | M | Spouse | Roda de | Retired | Primary | Low | Yes | Mother-in-law |
| GDS22 | 65 | F | Son | Roda de | Retired | Secondary | Low | No | No |
| GDS23 | 63 | F | Spouse | Roda de | Active | Secondary | Medium–Low | Yes | Mother |
| GDS24 | 62 | F | Spouse | Roda de | Active | Secondary | Medium–high | No | No |
| GDS25 | 62 | M | Spouse | Roda de | Active | Primary | Low | Yes | No |
| GDS26 | 61 | F | Spouse | Roda de | Active | Secondary | Medium–Low | Yes | No |
| GDS27 | 60 | F | Mother/Alone | Roda de | Active | Primary | Medium–Low | Yes | Mother |
Source: Authors.
Absolute occurrences or frequencies of the themes and sub-themes within the discourses of the four focus groups (n = 27).
| Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Negative Effects of the Pandemic on the Well-Being of the Elderly Aged over 60 (T1) | 35 | 26 | 43 | 43 | 147 |
| 1.1. Emotional impact of the lack of physical contact with their loved ones (S-T1.1) | 8 | 4 | 8 | 14 | 34 |
| 1.2. Perception of loneliness during the confinement (S-T 1.2) | 0 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 15 |
| 1.3. Negative perception about the passing of time (S-T1.3) | 1 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 19 |
| 1.4. Concern and anxiety triggered by uncertainty (S-T1.4) | 21 | 8 | 18 | 16 | 63 |
| 1.4.1. Anxiety about the uncertain situation (S-T1.4.1) | 9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 23 |
| 1.4.2. Anxiety about fear of sickness (S-T1.4.2) | 11 | 5 | 11 | 11 | 38 |
| 1.5. Sadness at the loss of loved ones | 7 | 3 | 13 | 8 | 31 |
| 1.5.1. Difficulty in managing the bereavement | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 12 |
| 2. Emotional, humanizing and operational role of ICT in enhancing well-being and mitigating fear of the elderly aged over 60 during the pandemic (T2) | 28 | 31 | 22 | 18 | 99 |
| 2.1. Emotional support of ICT for the contact with their loved ones (S-T2.1) | 11 | 15 | 11 | 9 | 46 |
| 2.2. Operational role of ICT in mitigating fear through the avoidance of infection (S-T2.2) | 15 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 38 |
| 2.3. ICT as entertainment and distraction tools during the confinement (S-T2.3) | 2 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 18 |
| 3. Learning ICT and ICT-enhanced learning as motivational triggers of effort and personal autonomy of the elderly (T3) | 1 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 17 |
| 3.1. Learning ICT and self-satisfaction (S-T3.1) | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 11 |
| 3.2. Use of ICT to foster hobbies and to address personal concerns (S-T3.2) | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
Source: Authors, using ATLAS.ti.
Distribution of occurrences per participant on the theme 1 and the related sub-themes (S-T1.1, S-T1.2, S-T1.3, S-T1.4, S-T1.4.1, S-T1.4.2, S-T1.5, S-T1.5.1) (Table 2).
| T1 | S-T1.1 | S-T1.2 | S-T1.3 | S-T1.4 | S-T1.4.1 | S-T1.4.2 | S-T1.5 | S-T1.5.1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 35 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 9 | 11 | 7 | 3 |
| GAS1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GAS2 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| GAS3 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| GAS4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| GAS5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| GAS6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Group B | 26 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| GBS7 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| GBS8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| GBS9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| GBS10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| GBS11 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GBS12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GBS13 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Group C | 43 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 18 | 5 | 11 | 13 | 5 |
| GCS14 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| GCS15 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| GCS16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| GCS17 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| GCS18 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| GCS19 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
| Group D | 43 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 8 | 2 |
| GDS20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| GDS21 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| GDS22 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GDS23 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| GDS24 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| GDS25 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| GDS26 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| GDS27 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Source: Authors, using ATLAS.ti.
Distribution of occurrences per participant on the theme 2 (T2) and the related sub-themes (S-T2.1, S-T2.2, S-T2.3) (Table 2).
| T2 | T-S2.1 | T-S2.2 | T-S2.3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 28 | 11 | 15 | 2 |
| GAS1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GAS2 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| GAS3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| GAS4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| GAS5 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 |
| GAS6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Group B | 31 | 15 | 10 | 9 |
| GBS7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| GBS8 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| GBS9 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| GBS10 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| GBS11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GBS12 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| GBS13 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Group C | 22 | 11 | 7 | 4 |
| GCS14 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| GCS15 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GCS16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| GCS17 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| GCS18 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| GCS19 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Group D | 18 | 9 | 6 | 3 |
| GDS20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| GDS21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GDS22 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| GDS23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GDS24 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| GDS25 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| GDS26 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| GDS27 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Source: Authors, using ATLAS.ti.
Distribution of occurrences per participant on the theme 3 (T3) and the related sub-themes (S-T3.1, S-T3.2) (Table 2).
| T3 | T-S3.1 | T-S3.2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| GAS1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| GAS2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GAS3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GAS4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GAS5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GAS6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Group B | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| GBS7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GBS8 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| GBS9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GBS10 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GBS11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GBS12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GBS13 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Group C | 6 | 5 | 0 |
| GCS14 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| GCS15 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| GCS16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GCS17 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| GCS18 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| GCS19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Group D | 5 | 4 | 1 |
| GDS20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GDS21 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| GDS22 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GDS23 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| GDS24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GDS25 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GDS26 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| GDS27 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Source: Authors, using ATLAS.ti.