| Literature DB >> 33917668 |
Albert Pérez-Bellmunt1,2, Noé Labata-Lezaun1,2, Luis Llurda-Almuzara1,2, Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz1,2, Vanessa González-Rueda1,2, Elena Bueno-Gracia3, Derya Celik4, Carlos López-de-Celis1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pre-competition massage is usually used to improve athletic performance and reduce risk of injury. Despite its usual use, the effects of pre-competition massage on neuromuscular function have barely been studied. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of the pre-competition massage over the gastrocnemius neuromuscular function.Entities:
Keywords: athletic performance; massage; muscle tonus; musculoskeletal manipulations; physical therapy; sport
Year: 2021 PMID: 33917668 PMCID: PMC8067956 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18083891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Sample Characteristics.
| Variable | N (%)—Mean (SD) |
|---|---|
| Sex | 10 women (33.3%); 20 men (66.7%) |
| Age (years) | 23.87 (6.17) |
| Weight (kg) | 69.23 (1.76) |
| Height (cm) | 174 (9.00) |
Figure 1(a) Tensiomyography; (b) Myotonometry.
Outcomes intragroup.
| Baseline | Post-Intervention | Difference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Effect Size | ||
| Experimental Limb | ||||||
| Tensiomyography | Td | 21.16 (1.93) | 21.64 (1.83) | 0.48 (1.64) | 0.119 a | 0.26 |
| Tc | 27.01 (8.53) | 33.23 (11.64) | 6.21 (10.36) | 0.002 b * | 0.61 | |
| Ts | 232.24 (81.34) | 210.21 (56.74) | −22.03 (82.97) | 0.237 b | 0.31 | |
| Tr | 65.92 (59.38) | 53.91 (20.86) | −12.01 (51.78) | 0.304 b | 0.27 | |
| Dm | 3.96 (1.11) | 4.26 (1.27) | 0.29 (0.86) | 0.102 b | 0.25 | |
| Myotonometry | Tone | 15.13 (1.44) | 14.69 (1.33) | −0.43 (0.55) | 0.001 a * | 0.32 |
| Stiffness | 260.88 (27.44) | 252.55 (28.43) | −8.33 (11.67) | 0.002 b * | 0.30 | |
| Relaxation | 20.93 (2.08) | 21.48 (1.90) | 0.56 (1.05) | 0.007 a * | 0.28 | |
| Control Limb | ||||||
| Tensiomyography | Td | 20.57 (1.72) | 20.96 (1.81) | 0.39 (1.27) | 0.106 a | 0.22 |
| Tc | 25.97 (8.93) | 27.72 (10.31) | 1.75 (8.59) | 0.049 b * | 0.18 | |
| Ts | 203.43 (45.61) | 208.02 (31.40) | 4.59 (40.82) | 0.060 b | 0.12 | |
| Tr | 44.22 (17.56) | 56.13 (30.88) | 11.92 (23.68) | 0.008 b * | 0.47 | |
| Dm | 4.31 (1.80) | 4.22 (1.91) | −0.09 (0.71) | 0.213 b | 0.05 | |
| Myotonometry | Tone | 15.10 (1.31) | 15.03 (1.23) | −0.06 (0.53) | 0.506 a | 0.06 |
| Stiffness | 259.92 (25.75) | 255.87 (24.76) | −4.05 (9.40) | 0.043 a * | 0.16 | |
| Relaxation | 20.89 (2.25) | 21.08 (2.19) | 0.19 (0.60) | 0.090 a | 0.09 | |
Abbreviations: SD: standard seviation; a: Paired t-test; b: Wilcoxon test; *: Statistically significant; Td: delay time; Tc: contraction time; Ts: sustained time; Tr: relaxation time; Dm: maximal radial displacement.
Differences between Groups.
| Variable | Mean (SD) | Effect Size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensiomyography | Td | 0.09 (1.76) | 0.098 b | 0.37 |
| Tc | 4.46 (10.25) | 0.038 b * | 0.50 | |
| Ts | −26.61 (85.87) | 0.019 b * | 0.05 | |
| Tr | −23.93 (54.94) | 0.117 b | 0.08 | |
| Dm | 0.38 (1.00) | 0.673 b | 0.03 | |
| Myotonometry | Tone | −0.37 (0.80) | 0.048 b * | 0.27 |
| Stiffness | −4.28 (12.52) | 0.123 a | 0.13 | |
| Relaxation | 0.36 (1.09) | 0.101 a | 0.20 |
Abbreviations: SD: standard deviation; a: Unpaired t-test; b: U Mann–Whitney test; *: Statistically significant; Td: delay time; Tc: contraction time; Ts: sustained time; Tr: relaxation time; Dm: maximal radial displacement.