Literature DB >> 33917514

Circulating Tumor DNA Reflects Uveal Melanoma Responses to Protein Kinase C Inhibition.

John J Park1,2,3, Russell J Diefenbach1,2, Natalie Byrne3, Georgina V Long2,4,5, Richard A Scolyer2,5,6, Elin S Gray7, Matteo S Carlino2,3,5, Helen Rizos1,2.   

Abstract

The prognosis for patients with UM is poor, and recent clinical trials have failed to prolong overall survival (OS) of these patients. Over 95% of UM harbor activating driver mutations, and this allows for the investigation of ctDNA. In this study, we investigated the value of ctDNA for adaptive clinical trial design in metastatic UM. Longitudinal plasma samples were analyzed for ctDNA in 17 metastatic UM patients treated with PKCi-based therapy in a phase 1 clinical trial setting. Plasma ctDNA was assessed using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and a custom melanoma gene panel for targeted next generation sequencing (NGS). Baseline ctDNA strongly correlated with baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (p < 0.001) and baseline disease burden (p = 0.002). Early during treatment (EDT) ctDNA accurately predicted patients with clinical benefit to PKCi using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC 0.84, [95% confidence interval 0.65-1.0, p = 0.026]). Longitudinal ctDNA assessment was informative for establishing clinical benefit and detecting disease progression with 7/8 (88%) of patients showing a rise in ctDNA and targeted NGS of ctDNA revealed putative resistance mechanisms prior to radiological progression. The inclusion of longitudinal ctDNA monitoring in metastatic UM can advance adaptive clinical trial design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PKC inhibitor; circulating tumor DNA; liquid biopsy; melanoma; next generation sequencing; response; treatment; uveal melanoma

Year:  2021        PMID: 33917514     DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  5 in total

Review 1.  New targeted and epigenetic therapeutic strategies for the treatment of uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Alexander Z Wei; Ashray B Maniar; Richard D Carvajal
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.854

Review 2.  Is Tissue Still the Issue? The Promise of Liquid Biopsy in Uveal Melanoma.

Authors:  Daniël P de Bruyn; Aaron B Beasley; Robert M Verdijk; Natasha M van Poppelen; Dion Paridaens; Ronald O B de Keizer; Nicole C Naus; Elin S Gray; Annelies de Klein; Erwin Brosens; Emine Kiliç
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-02-21

Review 3.  Prognostic Biomarkers in Uveal Melanoma: The Status Quo, Recent Advances and Future Directions.

Authors:  Nuno Jorge Lamas; Arnaud Martel; Sacha Nahon-Estève; Samantha Goffinet; Adam Macocco; Corine Bertolotto; Sandra Lassalle; Paul Hofman
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-25       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Do Extracellular RNAs Provide Insight into Uveal Melanoma Biology?

Authors:  Cristina Barbagallo; Chiara Bianca Maria Platania; Filippo Drago; Davide Barbagallo; Cinzia Di Pietro; Michele Purrello; Claudio Bucolo; Marco Ragusa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Anchored Multiplex PCR Custom Melanoma Next Generation Sequencing Panel for Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA.

Authors:  Russell J Diefenbach; Jenny H Lee; Ashleigh Stewart; Alexander M Menzies; Matteo S Carlino; Robyn P M Saw; Jonathan R Stretch; Georgina V Long; Richard A Scolyer; Helen Rizos
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.