| Literature DB >> 33916942 |
Rafael Kretschmer1,2, Marcelo Santos de Souza3, Ivanete de Oliveira Furo4, Michael N Romanov1, Ricardo José Gunski3, Analía Del Valle Garnero3, Thales Renato Ochotorena de Freitas2, Edivaldo Herculano Corrêa de Oliveira5,6, Rebecca E O'Connor1, Darren K Griffin1.
Abstract
Interchromosomal rearrangements involving microchromosomes are rare events in birds. To date, they have been found mostly in Psittaciformes, Falconiformes, and Cuculiformes, although only a few orders have been analyzed. Hence, cytogenomic studies focusing on microchromosomes in species belonging to different bird orders are essential to shed more light on the avian chromosome and karyotype evolution. Based on this, we performed a comparative chromosome mapping for chicken microchromosomes 10 to 28 using interspecies BAC-based FISH hybridization in five species, representing four Neoaves orders (Caprimulgiformes, Piciformes, Suliformes, and Trogoniformes). Our results suggest that the ancestral microchromosomal syntenies are conserved in Pteroglossus inscriptus (Piciformes), Ramphastos tucanus tucanus (Piciformes), and Trogon surrucura surrucura (Trogoniformes). On the other hand, chromosome reorganization in Phalacrocorax brasilianus (Suliformes) and Hydropsalis torquata (Caprimulgiformes) included fusions involving both macro- and microchromosomes. Fissions in macrochromosomes were observed in P. brasilianus and H. torquata. Relevant hypothetical Neognathae and Neoaves ancestral karyotypes were reconstructed to trace these rearrangements. We found no interchromosomal rearrangement involving microchromosomes to be shared between avian orders where rearrangements were detected. Our findings suggest that convergent evolution involving microchromosomal change is a rare event in birds and may be appropriate in cytotaxonomic inferences in orders where these rearrangements occurred.Entities:
Keywords: FISH; avian cytogenomics; chromosomal rearrangements; evolution; genome organization
Year: 2021 PMID: 33916942 DOI: 10.3390/cells10040826
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600