| Literature DB >> 33916039 |
David G Smithard1,2, Nadir Abdelhameed3, Thwe Han3, Angelo Pieris4.
Abstract
Discussion regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and admission to an intensive care unit is frequently fraught in the context of older age. It is complicated by the fact that the presence of multiple comorbidities and frailty adversely impact on prognosis. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mechanical ventilation are not appropriate for all. Who decides and how? This paper discusses the issues, biases, and potential harms involved in decision-making. The basis of decision making requires fairness in the distribution of resources/healthcare (distributive justice), yet much of the printed guidance has taken a utilitarian approach (getting the most from the resource provided). The challenge is to provide a balance between justice for the individual and population justice.Entities:
Keywords: aging; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ethics; outcome
Year: 2021 PMID: 33916039 DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics6020036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Geriatrics (Basel) ISSN: 2308-3417