| Literature DB >> 33916010 |
Mohammad Kaveh1, Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh1, Ebrahim Taghinezhad2, Dorota Witrowa-Rajchert3, Małgorzata Nowacka3.
Abstract
Most agricultural products are harvested with a moisture content that is not suitable for storage. Therefore, the products are subjected to a drying process to prevent spoilage. This study evaluates an infrared rotary dryer (IRRD) with three levels of infrared power (250, 500, and 750 W) and three levels of rotation speed (5, 10, and 15 rpm) to dry terebinth. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to illustrate and optimize the interaction between the independent variables (infrared power and rotation speed) and the response variables (drying time, moisture diffusivity, shrinkage, color change, rehydration rate, total phenolic content, and antioxidant activity). As infrared power and rotation speed increased, drying time, rehydration rate, antioxidant activity, and total phenolic content decreased, while the other parameters were increased. According to the results, the optimum drying conditions of terebinth were determined in the IRRD at an infrared power of 250 W and drum rotation speed of 5 rpm. The optimum values of the response variables were 49.5 min for drying time, 8.27 × 10-9 m2/s for effective moisture diffusivity, 2.26 for lightness, 21.60 for total color changes, 34.75% for shrinkage, 2.4 for rehydration rate, 124.76 mg GAE/g d.m. for total phenolic content and 81% for antioxidant activity.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant activity; color; infrared rotary drying; rehydration rate; shrinkage; terebinth; total phenolic compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33916010 PMCID: PMC8036459 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26071999
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Fitting effect of different levels of infrared power and rotary rotation speed on independent parameters.
| Parameter | Equation | R2 | Adj R2 | Pred R2 | CV [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DT | +215 − 2.76 × A − 0.16 × B | 0.9905 | 0.9874 | 0.9770 | 4.1 |
|
| −1.51 × 10−9 + 1.55 × 10−10 × A + 4.08 × 10−12 × B + 1.22 × 10−13 × A × B + 5.35 × 10−15 × B2 | 0.9993 | 0.9986 | 0.9950 | 2.2 |
| L* | −6.09 + 0.93 × A + 0.01 × B | 0.9630 | 0.9507 | 0.9140 | 12.6 |
| ΔE | +25.04 − 1.79 × A + 0.003 × B + 0.19 × A2 | 0.9980 | 0.9967 | 0.9931 | 1.7 |
| Sb | +19.86 − 0.03 × A + 0.06 × B + 0.001 × A × B − 0.00003 × B2 | 0.9986 | 0.9971 | 0.9910 | 1.0 |
| RR | +3.44 − 0.016 × A − 0.004 × B + 0.000002 × B2 | 0.9925 | 0.9879 | 0.9736 | 2.4 |
| TPC | +132.99 − 0.39 × A − 0.025 × B | 0.9808 | 0.9744 | 0.9596 | 0.8 |
| AA | +100.51 − 0.448 × A − 0.069 × B | 0.9886 | 0.9848 | 0.9767 | 3.0 |
A: rotation speed (rpm); B: infrared power (W); R2: determination coefficient; CV: coefficient of variation.
Figure 1Effect of the infrared power and rotation speed on (a) drying time and (b) effective moisture diffusivity (D) of the terebinth dried under an infrared rotary dryer (IRRD).
Figure 2Effect of the infrared power and rotation speed on (a) lightness (L*) and (b) total color change in the terebinth dried under an IRRD.
Figure 3Effect of the infrared power and rotation speed on (a) shrinkage and (b) rehydration rate of the terebinth dried under an IRRD.
Figure 4Effect of the infrared power and rotation speed on (a) total phenolic compounds (TPC) and (b) antioxidant activity (with DPPH) of the terebinth dried under an IRRD.
Figure 5Scheme of infrared rotary dryer (IRRD).
Boundary conditions of independent and dependent variables.
| Parameter | Symbol | Unit | Category | Target | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrared power | P | W | Input | In the range | 250 | 750 |
| Rotation speed | V | rpm | Input | In the range | 0.5 | 1 |
| Drying time | DT | min | Output | minimum | 52 | 165 |
| Moisture diffusivity |
| m2/s | Output | maximum | 7.78 × 10−10 | 8.34 × 10−9 |
| Lightness | L* | - | Output | minimum | 2.26 | 15.93 |
| Total color change | ΔE | - | Output | minimum | 21.81 | 44.19 |
| Shrinkage | Sb | % | Output | minimum | 34.38 | 59.99 |
| Rehydration rate | RR | - | Output | maximum | 1.40 | 2.43 |
| Total phenolic content | TPC | mg GAE/g d.m. | Output | maximum | 108.05 | 125.57 |
| Antioxidant activity | AA | % | Output | maximum | 43.21 | 80.52 |