Literature DB >> 33915475

Assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters using a deep learning algorithm-based markerless motion capture system.

Robert M Kanko1, Elise K Laende2, Gerda Strutzenberger3, Marcus Brown4, W Scott Selbie4, Vincent DePaul5, Stephen H Scott6, Kevin J Deluzio2.   

Abstract

Spatiotemporal parameters can characterize the gait patterns of individuals, allowing assessment of their health status and detection of clinically meaningful changes in their gait. Video-based markerless motion capture is a user-friendly, inexpensive, and widely applicable technology that could reduce the barriers to measuring spatiotemporal gait parameters in clinical and more diverse settings. Two studies were performed to determine whether gait parameters measured using markerless motion capture demonstrate concurrent validity with those measured using marker-based motion capture and a pressure-sensitive gait mat. For the first study, thirty healthy young adults performed treadmill gait at self-selected speeds while marker-based motion capture and synchronized video data were recorded simultaneously. For the second study, twenty-five healthy young adults performed over-ground gait at self-selected speeds while footfalls were recorded using a gait mat and synchronized video data were recorded simultaneously. Kinematic heel-strike and toe-off gait events were used to identify the same gait cycles between systems. Nine spatiotemporal gait parameters were measured by each system and directly compared between systems. Measurements were compared using Bland-Altman methods, mean differences, Pearson correlation coefficients, and intraclass correlation coefficients. The results indicate that markerless measurements of spatiotemporal gait parameters have good to excellent agreement with marker-based motion capture and gait mat systems, except for stance time and double limb support time relative to both systems and stride width relative to the gait mat. These findings indicate that markerless motion capture can adequately measure spatiotemporal gait parameters of healthy young adults during treadmill and over-ground gait.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Deep learning; Gait analysis; Gait mat; Markerless motion capture; Spatiotemporal parameters

Year:  2021        PMID: 33915475     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  A novel smartphone application is reliable for repeat administration and comparable to the Tekscan Strideway for spatiotemporal gait.

Authors:  Marie Kelly; Peter Jones; Ryan Wuebbles; Vipul Lugade; Daniel Cipriani; Nicholas G Murray
Journal:  Measurement (Lond)       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.927

2.  Feasibility of Markerless Motion Capture for Three-Dimensional Gait Assessment in Community Settings.

Authors:  Theresa E McGuirk; Elliott S Perry; Wandasun B Sihanath; Sherveen Riazati; Carolynn Patten
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Absolute Reliability of Gait Parameters Acquired With Markerless Motion Capture in Living Domains.

Authors:  Sherveen Riazati; Theresa E McGuirk; Elliott S Perry; Wandasun B Sihanath; Carolynn Patten
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Analysis of Volleyball Video Intelligent Description Technology Based on Computer Memory Network and Attention Mechanism.

Authors:  Zhongzi Zhang
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-28

5.  Applications and limitations of current markerless motion capture methods for clinical gait biomechanics.

Authors:  Logan Wade; Laurie Needham; Polly McGuigan; James Bilzon
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.