Sebastian Wurthmann1,2, Steffen Naegel1,3, Miriam Roesner1,2, Michael Nsaka1,2, Armin Scheffler1,2, Christoph Kleinschnitz1,2, Dagny Holle1,2, Mark Obermann4. 1. Department of Neurology, Dizziness and Vertigo Center Essen, West German Headache Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. 2. Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. 3. Department of Neurology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany. 4. Department of Neurology, Weser-Egge Hospital Höxter, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vestibular migraine (VM) patients are ictally and interictally hypersensitive for self-motion and visual perception. Increased cortical excitability of the vestibular system represented by lowered motion perception thresholds might play an important role in the pathophysiology of VM. We aimed to compare motion perception thresholds and the vegetative response to rotatory motion, as well as the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) during rotation in VM patients compared to healthy controls (HC). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 28 female VM patients in the interictal state and 33 age- and gender-matched HC were investigated sitting in a motorized rotary chair shielded regarding visual and acoustic stimuli for 20 min with slowly increasing velocity (maximum = 72°/s). The motion perception threshold was indicated by the participants by pushing a button. During and after rotation, participants rated the presence and extent of motion sickness using a sickness rating scale. RESULTS: We detected lower motion perception thresholds (7.54°/s vs. 23.49°/s; p < 0.001) in VM patients compared to HC but no difference at the basic VOR thresholds. Furthermore, the patients showed enhanced susceptibility to motion sickness during and after the rotation. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence for decreased motion perception thresholds and pronounced susceptibility to motion sickness in VM patients in the interictal state, which could indicate alterations in higher levels of vestibular processing. Future studies should determine whether this could be the pathophysiological hallmark of VM either as a unique disease entity or in differentiation from other forms of migraine.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Vestibular migraine (VM) patients are ictally and interictally hypersensitive for self-motion and visual perception. Increased cortical excitability of the vestibular system represented by lowered motion perception thresholds might play an important role in the pathophysiology of VM. We aimed to compare motion perception thresholds and the vegetative response to rotatory motion, as well as the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) during rotation in VM patients compared to healthy controls (HC). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 28 female VM patients in the interictal state and 33 age- and gender-matched HC were investigated sitting in a motorized rotary chair shielded regarding visual and acoustic stimuli for 20 min with slowly increasing velocity (maximum = 72°/s). The motion perception threshold was indicated by the participants by pushing a button. During and after rotation, participants rated the presence and extent of motion sickness using a sickness rating scale. RESULTS: We detected lower motion perception thresholds (7.54°/s vs. 23.49°/s; p < 0.001) in VM patients compared to HC but no difference at the basic VOR thresholds. Furthermore, the patients showed enhanced susceptibility to motion sickness during and after the rotation. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence for decreased motion perception thresholds and pronounced susceptibility to motion sickness in VM patients in the interictal state, which could indicate alterations in higher levels of vestibular processing. Future studies should determine whether this could be the pathophysiological hallmark of VM either as a unique disease entity or in differentiation from other forms of migraine.