Ruiqing Yang1, Ruiyi Qian1, Kerun Chen1, Wei Yi1, Xiutian Sima2. 1. West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. simaxiutian@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have investigated the association between rs2304016 and rs17183814 polymorphisms in sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 2 (SCN2A) and epilepsy risk and responsiveness to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) but with conflicting results. Our aim was to reevaluate the relationship by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: By searching PubMed, Medline, and CNKI, 14 studies were selected. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed to measure the association between rs17183814 and rs2304016 polymorphisms and the risk of epilepsy and AEDs response using the fixed-effects model or the random-effects model. RESULTS: No significant association between the rs17183814 in SCN2A and the risk of epilepsy was observed (heterozygous comparison: OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61-1.00; homozygous comparison: OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.63-2.86; dominant model: OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.64-1.04; recessive model: OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.68-3.05; allele comparison: OR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.71-1.10). Moreover, neither the rs17183814 nor the rs2304016 was associated with AEDs response. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that the rs17183814 and rs2304016 polymorphisms in SCN2A are not associated with the risk of epilepsy and response to AEDs.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have investigated the association between rs2304016 and rs17183814 polymorphisms in sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 2 (SCN2A) and epilepsy risk and responsiveness to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) but with conflicting results. Our aim was to reevaluate the relationship by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: By searching PubMed, Medline, and CNKI, 14 studies were selected. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed to measure the association between rs17183814 and rs2304016 polymorphisms and the risk of epilepsy and AEDs response using the fixed-effects model or the random-effects model. RESULTS: No significant association between the rs17183814 in SCN2A and the risk of epilepsy was observed (heterozygous comparison: OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61-1.00; homozygous comparison: OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.63-2.86; dominant model: OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.64-1.04; recessive model: OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.68-3.05; allele comparison: OR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.71-1.10). Moreover, neither the rs17183814 nor the rs2304016 was associated with AEDs response. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that the rs17183814 and rs2304016 polymorphisms in SCN2A are not associated with the risk of epilepsy and response to AEDs.