Literature DB >> 33914005

Email Vs. Instagram Recruitment Strategies For Online Survey Research.

Rafael R Moraes1, Marcos B Correa1, Ândrea Daneris1, Ana B Queiroz1, João P Lopes1, Giana S Lima1, Maximiliano S Cenci1, Otávio P D'Avila1, Claudio M Pannuti2, Tatiana Pereira-Cenci1, Flávio F Demarco1.   

Abstract

In this study, we describe a method for reaching a target population (i.e., dentists practicing in Brazil) to engage in survey research using traditional e-mail invites and recruitment campaigns created on Instagram. This study addresses methodological aspects and compares respondents reached by different methods. A pre-tested questionnaire was used and participants were recruited for 10 days via a source list of email addresses and two discrete Instagram organic open campaigns. A total of 3,122 responses were collected: 509 participants were recruited by email (2.1% response rate) and 2,613 by the two Instagram campaigns (20.7% and 11.7% conversion rates), respectively. Response/min collection rates in the first 24 h ranged between 0.23 (email) and 1.09 (first campaign). In total, 98.8% of all responses were received in the first 48 h for the different recruitment strategies. There were significant differences for all demographic variables (p< 0.001) between email and Instagram respondents, except for sex (p=0.37). Instagram respondents were slightly older, had more professional experience (years in practice), and a higher graduate education level than email respondents. Moreover, most email and Instagram respondents worked in the public sector and private practice, respectively. Although both strategies could collect responses from all Brazilian regions, email responses were slightly better distributed across the five territorial areas compared to Instagram. This study provides evidence that survey recruitment of a diverse, large population sample using Instagram is feasible. However, combination of email and Instagram recruitment led to a more diverse population and improved response rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33914005     DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440202104291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  3 in total

1.  Knowledge about biosafety measures in clinical setting during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study with Brazilian dental students.

Authors:  Matheus Dos Santos Fernandez; Andreia Morales Cascaes; Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes Muniz; Nathalia Ribeiro Jorge da Silva; Camilla Hubner Bielavski; Alexandre Emidio Ribeiro Silva
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 1.385

2.  COVID-19 incidence, severity, medication use, and vaccination among dentists: survey during the second wave in Brazil.

Authors:  Rafael R Moraes; Marcos B Correa; Paulo R Martins-Filho; Giana S Lima; Flavio F Demarco
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.144

3.  A multi-country survey on the impact of COVID-19 on dental practice and dentists' feelings in Latin America.

Authors:  Rafael R Moraes; Carlos E Cuevas-Suárez; Wilfredo G Escalante-Otárola; María R Fernández; Andrés Dávila-Sánchez; Patricia Grau-Grullon; Eduardo Fernández; Tania M López; Guillermo Grazioli; Luis A Arana; Luis F Rondón; Willy B Torrez; Giana S Lima; Helena S Schuch; Marcos B Correa; Flavio F Demarco
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.