| Literature DB >> 33913083 |
Wanda Wilczyńska-Michalik1, Anna Różańska2, Małgorzata Bulanda2, Agnieszka Chmielarczyk2, Bartłomiej Pietras3, Marek Michalik4.
Abstract
Eight aerosol samples were collected in Krakow using a low-volume sampler in February and March 2019 during variable meteorological conditions and times of the day, to study their single particles' properties (size, morphology and chemical composition analyzed using a scanning electron microscope fitted with an energy-dispersive spectrometer) and microbiological characteristics. The content of particles of different chemical compositions larger than 2.5 μm was low. Considering the number of the particles, submicron particles strongly dominated with a high content of ultrafine particles (nanoparticles). Tar ball-type particles were relatively common in the studied samples, while soot was the dominant component. Soot was present as small agglomerates composed of few particles, but also as bigger agglomerates. Metal-containing particles of various chemical characteristics were abundant, with transition metals commonly occurring in these particles. The physicochemical characteristics of aerosols indicate that despite a relatively low mass concentration, their adverse health impact could be very strong because of the high content of nanoparticles, the abundance of soot and other fuel combustion-related particles, and the high incidence of transition metal-rich particles. Microbiological analysis was based on cultures on both solid and liquid agar. The MALDI-TOF method was used for species identification-for bacteria and fungi. Twelve different species of bacteria were isolated from the collected samples of aerosols. The most frequently isolated species was Gram-positive sporulating Bacillus licheniformis. The isolated mold fungi were of the genus Aspergillus.Entities:
Keywords: Aerosol health impact; Atmospheric particulate matter; Chemical composition of particles; Microorganisms in aerosols; Size and morphology of particles; Urban aerosol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33913083 PMCID: PMC8528768 DOI: 10.1007/s10653-021-00950-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Geochem Health ISSN: 0269-4042 Impact factor: 4.609
Sampling details
| Date (dd/mm/yyyy) | Sampling time | Volume of air (l) | Localization |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28/02/2019 | 9:00–16:30 | 3500 | Campus |
| 1/03/2019 | 8:00–15:45 | 3500 | Campus |
| 4/03/2019 | 8:30–16:20 | 3500 | Campus |
| 5/03/2019 | 8:35–16:40 | 3500 | Campus |
| 9/03/2019 | 15:25–24:20 | 4000 | Friedleina |
| 10/03/2019 | 12:00–19:40 | 4000 | Friedleina |
| 11/03/2019 | 15:10–23:35 | 4000 | Friedleina |
| 13/3/2019 | 8:30–17:50 | 5000 | Campus |
Campus—III Campus of the Jagiellonian University, 3a Gronostajowa Str.,
southern part of the city
Friedleina—22 Friedleina Str., northern part of the city
Meteorological conditions and atmospheric dust concentration (PM10 and PM2.5) during sampling
| Sample | Sampling time | Air temperature (oC) | Relative humidity (%) | Wind direction | Wind speed (m/s) | Cloudiness (oktas) | Atmospheric pressure | Weather phenomena | Concentration of PM10* | Concentration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28/02/2019 | 09:00 | 10.6 | 42.0 | 240 | 9.0 | 1 | 1007 | 59.4 | 31.3 | |
| 10:00 | 12.1 | 42.0 | 240 | 10.5 | 1 | 1006 | 55.3 | 24.0 | ||
| 11:00 | 13.5 | 39.0 | 250 | 10.5 | 1 | 1006 | 54.7 | 19.0 | ||
| 12:00 | 14.2 | 35.0 | 270 | 10.0 | 3 | 1005 | 59.7 | 21.0 | ||
| 13:00 | 14.6 | 33.0 | 280 | 9.5 | 3 | 1005 | 66.4 | 21.7 | ||
| 14:00 | 15.2 | 33.0 | 260 | 9.5 | 3 | 1005 | 53.6 | 20.0 | ||
| 15:00 | 14.6 | 35.0 | 270 | 9.0 | 3 | 1004 | 51.4 | 18.3 | ||
| 16:00 | 13.7 | 41.0 | 270 | 9.5 | 3 | 1004 | 44.7 | 15.3 | ||
| 17:00 | 12.1 | 47.0 | 279 | 9.5 | 3 | 1004 | 39.7 | 16.0 | ||
| 1/03/2019 | 08:00 | 2.3 | 81.0 | 280 | 3.0 | 6 | 1009 | 65.1 | 49.0 | |
| 09:00 | 3.6 | 77.0 | 280 | 3.5 | 6 | 1009 | 63.6 | 43.3 | ||
| 10:00 | 4.4 | 71.0 | 260 | 6.0 | 6 | 1009 | 65.3 | 40.7 | ||
| 11:00 | 5.9 | 64.0 | 280 | 5.0 | 7 | 1008 | 58.6 | 36.3 | ||
| 12:00 | 7.4 | 61.0 | 290 | 5.0 | 6 | 1008 | 56.3 | 36.3 | ||
| 13:00 | 7.7 | 64.0 | 280 | 5.0 | 7 | 1008 | 56.1 | 34.7 | ||
| 14:00 | 7.3 | 68.0 | 270 | 6.0 | 8 | 1007 | 58.3 | 38.3 | ||
| 15:00 | 6.7 | 76.0 | 260 | 5.5 | 8 | 1007 | 68.0 | 46.0 | ||
| 16:00 | 6 | 79.0 | 260 | 5.0 | 8 | 1007 | 77.3 | 54.7 | ||
| 4/03/2019 | 08:00 | 8.9 | 61.0 | 220 | 3.0 | 7 | 1004 | 29.9 | 16.0 | |
| 09:00 | 10.9 | 52.0 | 230 | 4.0 | 6 | 1003 | 35.6 | 13.0 | ||
| 10:00 | 13.2 | 48.0 | 220 | 8.0 | 6 | 1003 | 32.1 | 12.7 | ||
| 11:00 | 14.9 | 47.0 | 240 | 8.5 | 6 | 1002 | 27.0 | 9.3 | ||
| 12:00 | 15 | 41.0 | 210 | 6.0 | 7 | 1001 | 24.3 | 8.7 | ||
| 13:00 | 16.2 | 38.0 | 210 | 7.5 | 6 | 1000 | 20.3 | 7.3 | ||
| 14:00 | 17.1 | 41.0 | 220 | 6.0 | 6 | 999 | 17.6 | 6.7 | ||
| 15:00 | 16.6 | 44.0 | 230 | 6.5 | 7 | 998 | 19.9 | 6.3 | ||
| 16:00 | 15.6 | 44.0 | 220 | 1.5 | 7 | 997 | 24.9 | 7.7 | ||
| 17:00 | 14.8 | 49.0 | variable | 0.5 | 7 | 996 | 50.9 | 12.3 | ||
| 5/03/2019 | 08:00 | 5.3 | 59.0 | 230 | 9.5 | 6 | 1005 | 20.1 | 12.7 | |
| 09:00 | 7.1 | 56.0 | 240 | 12.5 | 5 | 1005 | 20.3 | 10.7 | ||
| 10:00 | 8.1 | 53.0 | 240 | 13.0 | 3 | 1005 | Wind gusts up to 18 m/s | 20.1 | 13.0 | |
| 11:00 | 8.4 | 51.0 | 230 | 12.5 | 2 | 1005 | 19.7 | 9.3 | ||
| 12:00 | 8.5 | 46.0 | 240 | 12.0 | 7 | 1006 | 21.0 | 7.3 | ||
| 13:00 | 9.6 | 52.0 | 230 | 11.5 | 6 | 1006 | 18.4 | 7.7 | ||
| 14:00 | 9.1 | 50.0 | 230 | 12.5 | 5 | 1006 | Wind gusts up to 18 m/s | 21.1 | 7.0 | |
| 15:00 | 8.7 | 81.0 | 240 | 11.5 | 7 | 1006 | 18.4 | 7.0 | ||
| 16:00 | 5.8 | 76.0 | 260 | 5.5 | 4 | 1007 | Shower rain | 15.7 | 9.0 | |
| 17:00 | 6.1 | 69.0 | 240 | 4.5 | 6 | 1007 | 15.6 | 9.7 | ||
| 9/03/2019 | 15:00 | 8.3 | 67.0 | 230 | 7.5 | 7 | 1012 | 10.6 | 6.0 | |
| 16:00 | 8.9 | 66.0 | 230 | 8.5 | 7 | 1012 | 10.9 | 6.7 | ||
| 17:00 | 8.9 | 69.0 | 220 | 6.0 | 7 | 1011 | 12.0 | 6.0 | ||
| 18:00 | 8.1 | 69.0 | 220 | 6.5 | 7 | 1010 | 13.3 | 8.3 | ||
| 19:00 | 8.6 | 77.0 | 220 | 8.0 | 8 | 1009 | Shower rain | 16.9 | 10.3 | |
| 20:00 | 8.1 | 83.0 | 230 | 7.5 | 8 | 1009 | Shower rain | 14.9 | 9.7 | |
| 21:00 | 7.3 | 81.0 | 230 | 6.5 | 8 | 1009 | Shower rain | 13.0 | 8.3 | |
| 22:00 | 7.2 | 77.0 | 230 | 4.5 | 7 | 1008 | 13.9 | 8.7 | ||
| 23:00 | 7.2 | 90.0 | 220 | 4.0 | 7 | 1007 | 14.0 | 11.0 | ||
| 00:00 | 5.7 | 79.0 | 210 | 4.5 | 8 | 1006 | Shower rain | 20.6 | 7.0 | |
| 01:00 | 7.7 | 81.0 | 230 | 9.5 | 7 | 1006 | 14.3 | 6.3 | ||
| 10/03/2019 | 12:00 | 9.2 | 49.0 | 240 | 9.5 | 7 | 1009 | 12.1 | 7.7 | |
| 13:00 | 9.4 | 74.0 | 240 | 8.5 | 7 | 1008 | 12.3 | 8.0 | ||
| 14:00 | 6.9 | 85.0 | 220 | 8.0 | 8 | 1007 | Light rain | 13.7 | 7.3 | |
| 15:00 | 5.9 | 84.0 | 230 | 4.0 | 8 | 1006 | Light rain | 8.1 | 5.0 | |
| 16:00 | 6.2 | 84.0 | variable | 0.5 | 8 | 1004 | 8.7 | 6.7 | ||
| 17:00 | 6.3 | 86.0 | 100 | 2.0 | 8 | 1002 | 11.9 | 9.3 | ||
| 18:00 | 6 | 84.0 | 20 | 1.5 | 7 | 1000 | 13.9 | 14.7 | ||
| 19:00 | 6.4 | 78.0 | 270 | 2.0 | 8 | 1000 | 15.9 | 11.3 | ||
| 20:00 | 8.7 | 84.0 | 230 | 7.5 | 7 | 999 | 11.4 | 7.0 | ||
| 11/03/2019 | 15:00 | 7.7 | 42.0 | 230 | 6.5 | 5 | 1009 | 12.0 | 7.0 | |
| 16:00 | 6.2 | 53.0 | 250 | 7.0 | 7 | 1010 | 16.1 | 7.3 | ||
| 17:00 | 3.1 | 83.0 | 230 | 11.5 | 8 | 1011 | Shower rain with snow | 15.1 | 5.3 | |
| 18:00 | 1.2 | 90.0 | 290 | 7.0 | 7 | 1012 | Shower rain with snow | 9.7 | 5.3 | |
| 19:00 | 1 | 91.0 | 250 | 4.0 | 5 | 1013 | 11.9 | 9.0 | ||
| 20:00 | 0.6 | 93.0 | 200 | 3.0 | 4 | 1014 | 18.6 | 14.3 | ||
| 21:00 | 0.5 | 91.0 | 230 | 3.0 | 2 | 1015 | 25.0 | 20.3 | ||
| 22:00 | 0.7 | 89.0 | 220 | 3.5 | 7 | 1015 | 28.0 | 26.0 | ||
| 23:00 | 1.1 | 93.0 | 260 | 5.0 | 7 | 1015 | Light snow | 27.2 | 26.7 | |
| 00:00 | 0.9 | 95.0 | 240 | 5.5 | 7 | 1015 | Light shower snow | 26.0 | 21.0 | |
| 13/03/2019 | 08:00 | 1.3 | 65.0 | variable | 1.0 | 8 | 1010 | 51.6 | 19.3 | |
| 09:00 | 4.3 | 55.0 | variable | 1.5 | 8 | 1010 | 44.6 | 16.7 | ||
| 10:00 | 7.2 | 50.0 | 210 | 3.5 | 8 | 1010 | 27.0 | 10.3 | ||
| 11:00 | 7 | 57.0 | 220 | 7.0 | 8 | 1010 | 22.1 | 9.7 | ||
| 12:00 | 6.4 | 62.0 | 220 | 3.5 | 8 | 1011 | 19.6 | 8.7 | ||
| 13:00 | 6.3 | 61.0 | 230 | 5.0 | 8 | 1011 | 22.7 | 9.3 | ||
| 14:00 | 7.6 | 56.0 | 230 | 6.5 | 6 | 1011 | 22.1 | 9.3 | ||
| 15:00 | 8.3 | 56.0 | 240 | 7.0 | 5 | 1011 | 22.4 | 11.7 | ||
| 16:00 | 8.1 | 59.0 | 210 | 6.0 | 6 | 1010 | 22.3 | 13.7 | ||
| 17:00 | 7.3 | 66.0 | 210 | 4.0 | 6 | 1010 | 23.7 | 13.0 |
*Average from seven stations
**Average from three stations
Fig. 1Coarse particles in atmospheric dust (SEM images). a and b. Fibrous plant debris. c. Pollen grain. d. Big aluminosilicate grain (containing Fe, Mg, Ti, Ca, K, Na); smaller particle (arrow) is composed of Cl and Na
Fig. 2Particles of the size from 2.5 to 10 μm (SEM images). a and b. Aluminosilicate aggregates. c and d. Aggregates of soot particles. e. Elongated Ca sulfate grain. f. Ca and Mg carbonate
Fig. 3Atmospheric particulate matter on filter (SEM images, magnification 5 000 x). Dominance of particles below 1 μm. High content of soot and spherical tar ball-type particles. Very low content of particles above 1 μm. Images represent different samples: a—28/02/2019; b—01/03/2019; c—04/03/2019; d—05/03/2019; e—09/03/2019; f—10/03/2019; g—11/03/2019; h—13/03/2019
Fig. 4Atmospheric particulate matter on filter (SEM images, magnification 25 000 x). Soot and tar ball-type particles below 1 μm. Images represent different samples: a—28/02/2019; b—01/03/2019; c—04/03/2019; d—05/03/2019; e—09/03/2019; f—10/03/2019; g—11/03/2019; h—13/03/2019
Fig. 5Particles on filters (SEM images, magnification 100 000 x). Soot and single tar ball particle (e) around and below 100 nm. Images represent different samples: a—28/02/2019; b—01/03/2019; c—04/03/2019; d—05/03/2019; e—09/03/2019; f—10/03/2019; g—11/03/2019; h—13/03/2019
Fig. 6Tar ball-type particles of different size and morphology (SEM, a to d—secondary electrons images). a to c. Tar balls of the size from 200 nm to 1 μm (a—11/03/2019; b—28/02/2019; c—13/03/2019), c and d. Tar ball-type particles—smaller hemispherical forms joined to larger spheres (d—13/03/2019), e and f. Tar ball-type particle with elevated content of Ba and S (e—backscattered electrons image; f—secondary electrons image). Brighter zones (e) are enriched in Ba and S. (e, f—05/03/2019)
Fig. 7Soot particles (SEM, secondary electron images). a to c. Soot—small agglomerates composed of several particles and single particles (a—10/03/2019; b—09/03/2019; c—09/03/2019), d. Loosely packed agglomerate of numerous soot particles; tar balls (arrows) (09/03/2019), e. Lacey-type agglomerate of soot particles (05/03/2019), f. Compact agglomerate of soot particles (13/03/2019)
Fig. 8Metal-rich particles (SEM, backscattered electrons images; content of major components presented for selected analytical spots). a. Spherical Fe-rich particle (arrow) (Fe—52.5wt%; Mn—23.1wt%; Zn—1.2wt%; O—17.3wt%); b. Particles rich in Mn (particle 1: Mn—61.1wt%; Zn—2.9wt%; Fe—8,4wt%; O—21.7wt%; Si—5.99wt%; particle 2: Mn—66.1wt%; Zn—2.1wt%; O—22.4wt%; Si—9.5wt%); c. Particles rich in metals (spot 1: Fe—32.5wt%; Mn—5.0wt%; Zn—20.3wt%; Cr—4.1wt%; Ni—1.8wt%; Mg—9.6wt% O—18.0wt%; spot 2: Fe—34.7wt%; Mn—4.3wt%; Zn –21.5wt%; Cr—2.7wt%; Ni—1.4wt%; Mg—7.8wt%; O—18.8wt%; spot 3: Fe—22.7wt%; Mn—4.0wt%; Zn—9.2wt%; Cr—25.9wt%; Ni—1.2wt%; Mg—8.2wt%; O—21.3wt%); d. Cu-rich particles on aluminosilicate grain (spot 1: Cu—87.owt%; O—10.2wt%; spot 2: Cu 94.4wt%; O—3.9wt%; spot 3: Cu—86.6wt%; O—11.7wt%); e. Particle rich in Pb (Pb—60.1wt%; O—28.2wt%; Fe—2.7wt%; S—9.0wt%); f. Particle rich in Sn and Pb (Sn—53.7wt%; Pb—11.2wt%; O—35.1wt%); g. Small spherical Fe-rich particles (spot 1: Fe—65.7; Mn—6.33wt%; Zn—3.5wt%; Cr—1.1wt%; O—22.5wt%; spot 2: Fe—74.9wt%; Mn—2.8wt%; O—20.7wt%); h. Particle rich in Pb, Cl and O (spot 1: Pb—52.6wt%; O—18.6wt%; Cl—26.8wt%; spot 2: 52.6wt%; O—20.1wt%; Cl—24.7wt%; spot 3; Pb—49.3wt%; O—19.0wt%; Cl—12.1wt%; S—8.9wt%; K—9.7wt%)
Results of microbiological analysis of aerosol samples
| Date | Microorganism morphology (result of Gram stained) | Species | Species (quantitative culture) | CFU/ml | CFU/ml |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28/02/2019 | Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | 6 × 107 | 4 × 107 | ||
| Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | 1.6 × 106 | 1.1 × 108 | |||
| Gram-positive cocci | – | 6 × 106 | |||
| Gram-positive cocci | – | – | – | ||
| Gram-positive cocci | – | – | – | ||
| Molds | – | single | – | ||
| 1/03/2019 | Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | 3 × 108 | 1 × 108 | ||
| Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | 1.6 × 106 | 3 × 106 | |||
| Gram-positive cocci | – | – | – | ||
| Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | – | 4 × 107 | – | ||
| 4/03/2019 | Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | Bacillus simplex | 2 × 106 | 1 × 106 | |
| Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | Bacillus clausii | 3 × 106 | – | ||
| Gram-positive cocci | Streptococcus salivarius | – | 9 × 105 | ||
| Gram-positive cocci | Streptococcus parasanguinis | – | 2 × 105 | ||
| Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | – | 3 × 106 | – | ||
| 5/03/2019 | Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | 5 × 108 | 1 × 108 | ||
| Gram-positive cocci | – | 1.6 × 107 | |||
| 9/03/2019 | Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | 4 × 108 | 1 × 107 | ||
| Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | 2 × 107 | 3 × 108 | |||
| Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | 1.3 × 106 | 2 × 106 | |||
| Gram-positive cocci | – | – | |||
| 10/03/2019 | Gram-positive non-sporulating bacilli | 5 × 102 | 3 × 101 | ||
| Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | 2 × 102 | 1.5 × 102 | |||
| Gram-negative rods | – | – | – | ||
| Molds | – | – | – | ||
| 11/03/2019 | Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | 1.7 × 108 | 2 × 108 | ||
| Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | 1 × 107 | 4.2 × 107 | |||
| Molds | – | – | – | ||
| Gram-positive cocci | – | 1 × 106 | |||
| Gram-positive non-sporulating bacilli | – | – | – | ||
| Gram dodatni ziarenkowiec | – | – | – | ||
| Gram-negative rods | – | – | – | ||
| 13/03/2019 | Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | 1.4 × 107 | 9 × 106 | ||
| Gram-positive sporulating bacilli | 8 × 107 | 1 × 107 | |||
| Gram-positive non-sporulating bacilli | – | – | – | ||
| Gram-positive cocci | – | – | – |