| Literature DB >> 33912544 |
Honghui Shi1,2,3,4, Endian Yang1,2,3,4, Yun Li5, Xiaoyang Chen1,2,3,4, Junjie Zhang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
The drumstick tree is a fast-growing multipurpose tree with a large biomass and high nutritional value. However, it has rarely been exploited as a protein source. This study investigated solid-state fermentation induced by Aspergillus niger, Candida utilis and Bacillus subtilis to obtain high-quality protein feed from drumstick leaf flour. The results showed that fermentation induced significant changes in the nutritional composition of drumstick leaf flour. The concentrations of crude protein, small peptides and amino acids increased significantly after fermentation. The protein profile was also affected by the fermentation process. Macromolecular proteins in drumstick leaf flour were degraded, whereas other high molecular weight proteins were increased. However, the concentrations of crude fat, fiber, total sugar and reducing sugar were decreased, as were the anti-nutritional factors tannins, phytic acid and glucosinolates. After 24 h fermentation, the concentrations of total phenolics and flavonoids were increased. The antioxidant capacity was also significantly enhanced.Entities:
Keywords: Moringa oleifera Lam.; antioxidant activity; nutritional quality; protein; solid-state fermentation
Year: 2021 PMID: 33912544 PMCID: PMC8072291 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.626628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Phenotype and scanning electron microscope images (×4,000) of UDLF (A,C) and FDLF (B,D).
Nutrient composition of FDLF and UDLF.
| Item | UDLF | FDLF |
| CP,% | 28.42 ± 1.17b | 40.98 ± 0.59a |
| Small peptides,% | 5.72 ± 0.20b | 12.03 ± 0.12a |
| EE,% | 5.43 ± 0.18a | 3.75 ± 0.15b |
| CF,% | 7.25 ± 0.02a | 2.17 ± 0.04b |
| Ash,% | 10.49 ± 0.03b | 16.75 ± 0.02a |
| Total sugars,% | 18.49 ± 0.62a | 5.34 ± 0.88b |
| Reducing sugars,% | 12.38 ± 0.81a | 1.69 ± 0.16b |
| NDF,% | 24.41 ± 2.11b | 38.61 ± 2.97a |
| ADF,% | 13.40 ± 2.06 | 12.97 ± 2.75 |
| Lignin,% | 1.30 ± 0.16b | 2.13 ± 0.38a |
| Hemicellulose,% | 11.01 ± 0.29b | 22.40 ± 1.68a |
| Cellulose,% | 12.62 ± 1.49a | 7.50 ± 0.84b |
| Ca,% | 2.34 ± 0.01b | 3.64 ± 0.06a |
| P,% | 0.25 ± 0.00b | 0.42 ± 0.01a |
| K,% | 1.04 ± 0.02b | 1.28 ± 0.01a |
| Na,% | 0.03 ± 0.01b | 0.12 ± 0.01a |
| Mg,% | 0.96 ± 0.02b | 1.31 ± 0.02a |
| Fe, mg/100 g | 41.70 ± 0.57b | 73.05 ± 1.06a |
| Cu, mg/100 g | 1.25 ± 0.01b | 1.81 ± 0.01a |
| Zn, mg/100 g | 2.45 ± 0.09b | 3.53 ± 0.06a |
| Tannins, mg/g | 14.60 ± 0.58a | 8.59 ± 0.45b |
| Phytic acid, mg/g | 18.31 ± 0.71a | 7.30 ± 0.74b |
| Glucosinolates, mg/g | 19.11 ± 0.13a | 14.72 ± 0.24b |
FIGURE 2SDS-PAGE analysis of protein profiles in DLF during fermentation.
Amino acid composition of FDLF and UDLF.
| Amino acid composition,% | UDLF | FDLF |
| Arg | 1.42 ± 0.02b | 1.60 ± 0.01a |
| His | 0.50 ± 0.02b | 0.58 ± 0.01a |
| Ile | 0.97 ± 0.06b | 1.15 ± 0.03a |
| Leu | 2.06 ± 0.05b | 2.38 ± 0.04a |
| Lys | 1.40 ± 0.10 | 1.35 ± 0.02 |
| Phe | 1.31 ± 0.06b | 1.53 ± 0.01a |
| Thr | 1.12 ± 0.05b | 1.38 ± 0.02a |
| Val | 1.23 ± 0.08b | 1.47 ± 0.01a |
| Trp | 0.65 ± 0.07b | 1.03 ± 0.11a |
| Ala | 1.49 ± 0.06b | 1.80 ± 0.02a |
| Asp | 2.13 ± 0.11b | 2.48 ± 0.10a |
| Cys | 0.11 ± 0.04b | 0.15 ± 0.02a |
| Glu | 2.80 ± 0.08 | 2.69 ± 0.20 |
| Gly | 1.21 ± 0.01b | 1.55 ± 0.05a |
| Pro | 1.01 ± 0.04b | 1.44 ± 0.01a |
| Ser | 1.07 ± 0.04b | 1.27 ± 0.04a |
| Tyr | 0.84 ± 0.01b | 1.03 ± 0.01a |
| Essential AA,% | 10.66 ± 0.51b | 12.47 ± 0.26a |
| Non-essential AA,% | 10.65 ± 0.24b | 12.41 ± 0.20a |
| Total AA | 21.31 ± 0.75b | 24.88 ± 0.46a |
FIGURE 3Dynamic changes in total phenolic, flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity. (A) Total phenolic content, (B) total flavonoid content, (C) DPPH radical scavenging activities, (D) ABTS+ radical scavenging activities, and (E) total antioxidant capacity. Different letters indicate significantly difference at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Correlation analysis of the concentrations of total phenols and flavones and antioxidant activity in FDLF.
| Item | DPPH free radical scavenging rate | ABTS+ free radical scavenging rate | Total antioxidant ability |
| total phenols | 0.790* | 0.856** | 0.932** |
| flavones | 0.975** | 0.571 | 0.855** |