| Literature DB >> 33912458 |
Rong Tang1,2,3,4, Xiaomeng Liu1,2,3,4, Wei Wang1,2,3,4, Jie Hua1,2,3,4, Jin Xu1,2,3,4, Chen Liang1,2,3,4, Qingcai Meng1,2,3,4, Jiang Liu1,2,3,4, Bo Zhang1,2,3,4, Xianjun Yu1,2,3,4, Si Shi1,2,3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are widely thought to contribute to the dismal prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). CSCs share biological features with adult stem cells, such as longevity, self-renewal capacity, differentiation, drug resistance, and the requirement for a niche; these features play a decisive role in cancer progression. A prominent characteristic of PDAC is metabolic reprogramming, which provides sufficient nutrients to support rapid tumor cell growth. However, whether PDAC stemness is correlated with metabolic reprogramming remains unknown.Entities:
Keywords: metabolic rewiring; metabolism; pancreatic cancer; stemness; transcriptome
Year: 2021 PMID: 33912458 PMCID: PMC8071957 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.643465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1mRNAsi is associated with PDAC patient survival and oncogenic and metabolic pathways. (A) Patients were divided into two groups based on the median mRNAsi. (B) High mRNAsi values predicted poor OS of patients with PDAC. (C) DEGs between samples with high and low mRNAsi values. (D) KEGG analysis of the DEGs. (E) The top five pathways upregulated in samples with high mRNAsi values.
Basic characteristics of patients with different mRNAsi values.
| mRNAsi_low (n = 72) | mRNAsi_high (n = 73) | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male) | 52.80% | 56.20% |
|
| Age (year) | 63.64 | 66.45 |
|
| Race (white) | 88.90% | 86.30% |
|
| Liver metastasis (yes) | 25.00% | 17.81% |
|
| History of chronic pancreatitis (yes) | 8.33% | 9.59% |
|
| Residual tumor (R0) | 56.90% | 54.80% |
|
| Number of lymph nodes (median) | 2 | 2 |
|
| Location(head) | 81.94% | 78.08% |
|
| T stage (T3/4) | 81.94% | 87.67% |
|
| N stage (N1) | 79.17% | 68.49% |
|
| AJCC (>2b) | 80.56% | 68.49% |
|
| Grade | 45.83% | 47.95% |
|
Figure 2The mutational landscape and molecular subtypes of samples with high and low mRNAsi values. (A, B) The top 30 most mutated genes in PDAC samples with high and low mRNAsi values. (C, D) Cooccurrence and mutual exclusion of mutated genes in PDAC samples with high and low mRNAsi values. (E–G) Proportions of PDAC samples of different molecular subtypes (Moffitt cluster, Collison cluster and Bailey cluster) with high and low mRNAsi values.
The distribution of patients with previously reported molecular subtypes between the different mRNAsi groups.
| mRNAsi_low(n=72) | mRNAsi_high(n=73) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Basel | 38 | 28 | |
| Classical | 35 | 45 |
|
|
| |||
| Classical | 17 | 34 | |
| Exocrine | 35 | 26 | |
| Quasi-mesenchymal | 20 | 13 |
|
|
| |||
| Squamous | 16 | 15 | |
| Immunogenic | 18 | 7 | |
| Progenitor | 13 | 38 | |
| ADEX | 25 | 13 |
|
Figure 3WGCNA-based identification of 8 independent gene modules based on PDAC transcriptome data. (A, B) An appropriate β value was selected to increase the similarity matrix and obtain a scale-free coexpression network. (C) Eight gene modules remained after adjacent gene modules with high similarity were merged.
Figure 4WGCNA-based identification of gene modules and key genes associated with PDAC stemness. (A) Module-trait relationships revealed the correlations among gene modules, mRNAsi and metabolic pathways. (B) Identification of key genes significantly associated with both mRNAsi and modules in each gene module. (C) The differential expression of the selected key genes between the mRNAsi_high and mRNAsi_low groups.
Figure 5Differences in metabolic pathway activity between different clusters. (A) Unsupervised clustering distinguished two clusters based on the selected key genes. (B) mRNAsi is increased in cluster 2. (C) Differences in metabolic pathway activity between the mRNAsi_high and mRNAsi_low groups. (D) Differences in metabolic pathway activity between clusters 1 and 2.
Figure 6Validation of the differential expression of key OS-related genes. (A) The diagram shows that MAGEH1, MAP3K3 and PODN were validated in silico and by qRT-PCR. (B) Fourteen key genes were associated with the OS of patients with PDAC. (C) MAGEH1, MAP3K3 and PODN were downregulated in tumor tissues and cell lines.