| Literature DB >> 33912447 |
Alexander Rühle1,2,3, Anca-Ligia Grosu1,2, Nils H Nicolay1,2,3.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) comprise a heterogeneous population of multipotent stromal cells that have gained attention for the treatment of irradiation-induced normal tissue toxicities due to their regenerative abilities. As the vast majority of studies focused on the effects of MSCs for photon irradiation-induced toxicities, little is known about the regenerative abilities of MSCs for particle irradiation-induced tissue damage or the effects of particle irradiation on the stem cell characteristics of MSCs themselves. MSC-based therapies may help treat particle irradiation-related tissue lesions in the context of cancer radiotherapy. As the number of clinical proton therapy centers is increasing, there is a need to decidedly investigate MSC-based treatments for particle irradiation-induced sequelae. Furthermore, therapies with MSCs or MSC-derived exosomes may also become a useful tool for manned space exploration or after radiation accidents and nuclear terrorism. However, such treatments require an in-depth knowledge about the effects of particle radiation on MSCs and the effects of MSCs on particle radiation-injured tissues. Here, the existing body of evidence regarding the particle radiobiology of MSCs as well as regarding MSC-based treatments for some typical particle irradiation-induced toxicities is presented and critically discussed.Entities:
Keywords: mesenchymal stem cells; mesenchymal stromal cells; normal tissue toxicities; particle irradiation; radiation accidents; radiotherapy; space irradiation; stem cell therapy
Year: 2021 PMID: 33912447 PMCID: PMC8071947 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.616831
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Summary of preclinical studies that investigated the effects of different types of particle irradiation on MSCs.
| Authors and year | Reference | MSCs’ species and tissue/Animal model | Particle type | Main findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida-Porada et al., 2018 | ( | Human bone marrow | Protons +56Fe |
More pronounced deleterious effects after sequential proton and 56Fe ion IR on both MSCs and HSCs than after exposure to either ion alone Upregulation of cytokines involved in the maintenance of hematopoiesis and immune cell development after 56Fe ion IR (but downregulation after proton IR) Persistence of transcriptional changes induced by protons and 56Fe ions over several passages in culture (in contrast to photons) |
| Alessio et al., 2017 | ( | Human bone marrow | α particles |
Reduction of S-phase cells after 0.04 Gy and 2 Gy α particle IR Elevated apoptosis rates at 48 hours after 2 Gy α particle IR but not after photons More residual DNA double-strand breaks at 48 hours after exposure to 2 Gy α particles compared to 2 Gy photons Increased pATM activation after 2 Gy α particle IR than after 2 Gy photon IR |
| Kurpinski et al., 2009 | ( | Human bone marrow | 56Fe |
Pronounced G2/M phase arrest after 1 Gy56Fe IR Maintenance of osteogenic differentiation after 1 Gy56Fe IR Higher p53 activation after 56Fe exposure compared to photons More pronounced transcriptomic effects regarding DNA replication, DNA strand elongation and DNA binding/transferase activity for56Fe than for photons |
| Nicolay et al., 2015 | ( | Human bone marrow | 12C |
RBE values of 12C between 2.0 and 3.1 (at 10% clonogenic survival) Maintenance of stem cell characteristics Pronounced G2/M phase arrest after 4 Gy12C IR No increases in apoptosis after 4 Gy12C IR No residual DNA double-strand breaks after 4 Gy12C IR Strong phosphorylation of pATM at 2 hours after 4 Gy12C IR but return to baseline levels after 24 hours |
HSC, hematopoietic stem cell, IR, ionizing radiation, RBE, relative biological effectiveness.