| Literature DB >> 33912069 |
Marta García-Arévalo1,2, Estela Lorza-Gil1,2, Leandro Cardoso1, Thiago Martins Batista1,2, Thiago Reis Araujo1,2, Luiz Alberto Ferreira Ramos1, Miguel Arcanjo Areas1, Angel Nadal3, Everardo Magalhães Carneiro1,2, Ana Paula Davel1.
Abstract
Bisphenol-A (BPA) is an endocrine disruptor associated with higher risk of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases especially in susceptible populations. Because malnutrition is a nutritional disorder associated with high cardiovascular risk, we sought to compare the effects of short-term BPA exposure on cardiovascular parameters of healthy and protein-malnourished mice. Postweaned male mice were fed a normo- (control) or low-protein (LP) diet for 8 weeks and then exposed or not to BPA (50 μg kg-1 day-1) for the last 9 days. Systolic blood pressure was higher in BPA or LP groups compared with the control group. However, diastolic blood pressure was enhanced by BPA only in malnourished mice. Left ventricle (LV) end diastolic pressure (EDP), collagen deposition, and CTGF mRNA expression were higher in the control or malnourished mice exposed to BPA than in the respective nonexposed groups. Nevertheless, mice fed LP diet exposed to BPA exhibited higher angiotensinogen and cardiac TGF-β1 mRNA expression than mice treated with LP or BPA alone. Wall:lumen ratio and cross-sectional area of intramyocardial arteries were higher either in the LP or BPA group compared with the control mice. Taken together, our data suggest that short-term BPA exposure results in LV diastolic dysfunction and fibrosis, and intramyocardial arteries inward remodeling, besides potentiate protein malnutrition-induced hypertension and cardiovascular risk.Entities:
Keywords: Myocardial fibrosis; bisphenol-A; blood pressure; coronary vessels; low-protein diet
Year: 2021 PMID: 33912069 PMCID: PMC8072349 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.638506
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Effects of bisphenol A (BPA) exposure and low protein (LP) diet in hemodynamic parameters. Systolic (A) and diastolic (B) blood pressure, left ventricular (LV) systolic pressure (LVSP) (C), end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) (D), and maximum positive (Max+) (E) and negative (Max-) (F) pressure derivatives (dP/dt) in mice fed normoprotein (control) or LP diet during 8 weeks and exposed to BPA for 9 days. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (number of animals/group: Control = 8; BPA = 5; LP = 5; LPBPA = 5). One-way ANOVA followed by the Newman-Keuls test, *p < 0.05 vs. control; &p < 0.05 vs. LP; #p < 0.05 vs. BPA.
Figure 2Cardiomyocyte area, collagen deposition, and profibrotic gene expression in control and malnourished mice exposed to BPA. Representative images (bar = 50 μm; ×40 magnification) for H.E. (A) and Masson staining (C), cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area (CSA, B), and % collagen deposition (D) in the myocardial left ventricle of mice fed normoprotein (control) or low-protein (LP) diet during 8 weeks and exposed to BPA for 9 days. CTGF (E) and TGF-β1 (F) mRNA expression was quantified in LV samples. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (number of animals/group is indicated in the bars). One-way ANOVA followed by the Newman-Keuls test; *p < 0.05 vs. control; &p < 0.05 vs. LP; #p < 0.05 vs. BPA.
Figure 3Intramyocardial arterial remodeling following bisphenol A (BPA) and low-protein (LP) diet. Representative images for H.E. (A, bars = 50 μm) and quantified lumen diameter (B), wall thickness (C), wall/lumen ratio (D), and wall cross-sectional area (CSA, E) of intramyocardial coronary vessels in mice fed normoprotein (control) or LP diet during 8 weeks and exposed to BPA for 9 days. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (number of animals/group: control = 10; BPA = 9; LP = 6; LPBPA = 6). One-way ANOVA followed by the Newman-Keuls test; *p < 0.05 vs. control.
Renin-angiotensin system gene expression in mice following postweaning low-protein diet (LP) and/or bisphenol A (BPA) exposure.
| 1 ± 0.16 | 1.78 ± 0.41 | 1.06 ± 0.14 | 1.13 ± 0.23 | |
| 1 ± 0.29 | 0.88 ± 0.22 | 0.73 ± 0.21 | 0.98 ± 0.44 | |
| 1 ± 0.13 | 1.28 ± 0.36 | 1.23 ± 0.25 | 2.16 ± 0.53 | |
| 1 ± 0.13 | 1.02 ± 0.07 | 1.09 ± 0.16 | 1.32 ± 0.19 | |
| 1 ± 0.08 | 1.20 ± 0.19 | 1.65 ± 0.29 | 1.43 ± 0.64 | |
| 1 ± 0.10 | 1.51 ± 0.17 | 1.79 ± 0.12 | 1.96 ± 0.64 | |
| 1 ± 0.26 | 0.62 ± 0.10 | 1.10 ± 0.28 | 2.36 ± 0.67 |
Data are mean ± SEM (n = 4–6 animals/group). One-way ANOVA followed by the Newman-Keuls test;
p < 0.05 vs. LP;
p < 0.05 vs. BPA.