| Literature DB >> 33912049 |
Aswir Abd Rashed1, Hafandi Ahmad2, Siti Khadijah Abdul Khalid1, Devi-Nair Gunasegavan Rathi1.
Abstract
Edible bird's nest (EBN) is one of the expensive functional foods in herbal medicine. One of the major glyconutrients in EBN is sialic acid, which has a beneficial effect on neurological and intellectual capability in mammals. The aims of this research were to study the effects of sialic acid from EBN on cell viability and to determine its effect on mitochondria membrane potential (MtMP) in Caco-2, SK-N-MC, SH-SY5Y, and PC-12 cell lines. Fourteen samples of raw EBN were collected from four different states in Malaysia. The confluency of the epithelial monolayers measurement of the tight junction for all the cell lines was determined using transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), and the sialic acid uptake study in cell lines was determined by using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC). The MTT assay was conducted for cell viability study. The MtMP in cell lines was determined using the Mito Probe JC-1 Assay by flow cytometer analysis. We have recorded a statistically significant difference between the uptake of sialic acid from EBN and the standard solution. A higher amount of sialic acid was absorbed by the cells from extract of EBN compared to the standard solution. The amounts of sialic acid uptake in Caco-2, SK-N-MC, SH-SY5Y, and PC-12 cell lines were (0.019 ± 0.001), (0.034 ± 0.006), (0.021 ± 0.002), and (0.025 ± 0.000) µmol/L, respectively. The MTT results indicated that the concentration of sialic acid increased the cell viability and showed no cytotoxicity effects on cell lines when they were exposed to the sialic acid extract and sialic acid standard at all the tested concentrations. The number of active mitochondria was found to be significantly higher in SH-SY5Y cell lines with a 195% increase when treated with sialic acid from EBN. Although many researchers around the globe use SH-SY5Y and SK-N-MC for Alzheimer's disease (AD) study, based on our finding, SH-SY5Y was found to be the most suitable cell line for AD study by in vitro works where it has a known relationship with mitochondrial dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: SH-SY5Y; cell lines; edible bird’s nest; in vitro; mitochondrial dysfunction; sialic acid
Year: 2021 PMID: 33912049 PMCID: PMC8072155 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.633303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1Transepithelial electrical resistance assay (TEER) (Ohms*cm2) measurement of cell lines. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of triplicate experiments.
FIGURE 2Scattered plot shows the correlation between cell lines and day of culture. Values are given as 1 × 106 (mean ± SEM) for three independent biological determinations.
Effects of sialic acid from EBN on cell lines in 1 × 106 cells/ml.
| Treatment concentration (µg/ml) | Cell viability (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sialic acid extract | Sialic acid standard | |||||||
| Caco-2 | SK-N-MC | SH-SY5Y | PC-12 | Caco-2 | SK-N-MC | SH-SY5Y | PC-12 | |
| 0 | 8.9 ± 4.48c | 9.27 ± 0.61d | 9.3 ± 1.57d | 9.6 ± 1.76d | 9.6 ± 1.99b | 9.0 ± 4.69d | 9.5 ± 6.22c | 9.5 ± 2.50c |
| 20 | 79.13 ± 3.01b | 71.6 ± 4.38b | 61.63 ± 1.76b | 52.0 ± 8.58c | 65.93 ± 3.62a | 65.57 ± 2.48b | 54.0 ± 1.82b | 39.53 ± 4.89b |
| 40 | 77.67 ± 5.52b | 77.33 ± 3.48b | 64.57 ± 2.55b | 63.93 ± 3.62b | 63.9 ± 5.87a | 73.03 ± 0.81b | 54.0 ± 3.01b | 57.5 ± 6.54a |
| 60 | 90.2 ± 5.46a | 86.57 ± 4.85a | 81.93 ± 8.65a | 72.53 ± 2.67a | 78.23 ± 3.21a | 82.27 ± 0.91a | 65.77 ± 1.94a | 63.57 ± 4.25a |
| 80 | 74.47 ± 4.77b | 83.77 ± 4.56a | 53.3 ± 1.28c | 63.33 ± 4.95b | 69.07 ± 9.81a | 79.43 ± 3.17a | 51.0 ± 3.76b | 61.37 ± 7.90a |
| 100 | 70.6 ± 2.65b | 64.77 ± 5.46c | 49.17 ± 5.06c | 62.00 ± 2.91b | 64.67 ± 12.40a | 70.77 ± 6.76b | 43.46 ± 8.51b | 53.37 ± 7.03a |
Cells were treated with sialic acid extract and sialic acid standard for 24 h in serum-free medium. The optical density was determined by spectrophotometer at 570 nm. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of triplicate experiment. a, b, c, d Means without common letters in their superscript are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Sialic acid uptake studies by Caco-2, SK-N-MC, SH-SY5Y, and PC-12 cell lines.
| Treatment | Sialic acid uptake | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal solution (µmol/L) | Cell monolayer (µmol/L) | |||||||
| Caco-2 | SK-N-MC | SH-SY5Y | PC-12 | Caco-2 | SK-N-MC | SH-SY5Y | PC-12 | |
| Control | 0.003 ± 0.002b | 0.003 ± 0.003b | 0.004 ± 0.001c | 0.003 ± 0.000b | 0.003 ± 0.001c | 0.003 ± 0.005b | 0.003 ± 0.08b | 0.002 ± 0.000b |
| Extraction | 0.020 ± 0.001a | 0.055 ± 0.006a | 0.043 ± 0.002a | 0.043 ± 0.000a | 0.019 ± 0.001a | 0.034 ± 0.006a | 0.021 ± 0.002a | 0.025 ± 0.000a |
| Standard | 0.006 ± 0.002b | 0.004 ± 0.006b | 0.027 ± 0.003b | 0.003 ± 0.000b | 0.012 ± 0.001b | 0.004 ± 0.001b | 0.009 ± 0.003b | 0.003 ± 0.000b |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM in triplicate experiment. a, b, c Means without common letters in their superscript are significantly different (p < 0.05).
The numbers of mitochondria in flow cytometer analysis for Caco-2, PC-12, SH-SY5Y, and SK-N-MC cell lines.
| Types of cell lines | Numbers of mitochondria (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Sialic acid standard | Sialic acid extract | |
| Caco-2 | 96.04 ± 0.03a | 98.10 ± 0.94a | 80.40 ± 0.55b |
| PC-12 | 95.86 ± 1.15a | 92.98 ± 1.00a | 91.96 ± 0.65a |
| SH-SY5Y | 48.34 ± 1.22b | 96.39 ± 0.61a | 90.56 ± 0.85a |
| SK-N-MC | 93.76 ± 0.87a | 93.51 ± 0.70a | 94.80 ± 0.30a |
Values are expressed in mean ± SEM for three independent experiments. a, b Means without common letters in their superscript are significantly different (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 3Caco-2 cell lines with or without treatment with sialic acid using JC-1 Mito Probe by BD FACSAria™: (A) untreated cell; (B) control without CCP; (C) control with CCP; (D) treatment with standard sialic acid; (E) treatment with extraction of sialic acid.
FIGURE 6PC-12 cell lines with or without treatment with sialic acid using JC-1 Mito Probe by BD FACSAria™: (A) untreated cell; (B) control without CCP; (C) control with CCP; (D) treatment with standard sialic acid; (E) treatment with extraction of sialic acid.