| Literature DB >> 33912036 |
Mehwish Andleeb1, Haij Muhammad Shoaib Khan1, Muhammad Daniyal2.
Abstract
Background: Delivering plant extract at high loading with intact antioxidants and efficient skin permeation always remains a challenge. To address this, we prepared a stable gel formulation containing nanoethosomes loaded with Achillea millefolium L. (AM) extract for topical drug delivery. Method: The AM extract was tested at first for phytochemical analysis, antioxidant activity, total phenolic and flavonoid content, and FTIR examination. The nanoethosomes containing AM extract were synthesized and characterized by size, surface charge, and morphology, and entrapment efficiency (EE) was determined. The optimized nanoethosomes were then incorporated to develop a topical gel formulation and subjected to skin for permeation, pH, viscosity, and organoleptic evaluation for up to three months.Entities:
Keywords: Achillea millefolium L. extract; antioxidant; nanoethosomes; statistical approaches; topical drug delivery
Year: 2021 PMID: 33912036 PMCID: PMC8074965 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.603227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Composition of ethosomes formulations.
| Formulation code | SPC % (w/w) | Ethanol % (w/w) | Water % (w/w) | Extract % (w/w) | Propylene glycol % (w/w) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM1 | 1 | 20 | 57 | 2 | 20 |
| AM2 | 2 | 30 | 46 | 2 | 20 |
| AM3 | 3 | 40 | 35 | 2 | 20 |
| AM4 | 1 | 20 | 57 | 2 | 20 |
| AM5 | 2 | 30 | 46 | 2 | 20 |
| AM6 | 3 | 40 | 35 | 2 | 20 |
| AM7 | 1 | 20 | 57 | 2 | 20 |
| AM8 | 2 | 30 | 46 | 2 | 20 |
| AM9 | 3 | 40 | 35 | 2 | 20 |
SPC: Soyaphosphatidylcholine.
Phytochemical analysis of extracts.
| S. No. | Secondary Metabolites | AM |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Tannins | + |
| 2. | Flavonoids | + |
| 3. | Phenols | + |
| 4. | Saponins | + |
| 5. | Alkaloids | + |
| 6. | Terpenoids | + |
| 7. | Carbohydrates | + |
| 8. | Reducing sugar | − |
| 9. | Steroids | + |
| 10. | Glycosides | + |
+ Indicates presence of metabolites in sample; − indicates absence of metabolite in sample.
Spectral interpretation of FTIR spectra of plant extract.
| Sr# | Plant extract | Peak values | Functional group | Possible secondary metabolites |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 3365.64 | O-H (alcohol) | Alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, saponins, polyphenols, carbohydrates, steroids, terpenoids, carboxylic acid containing phytochemicals etc. |
| 2141.23 | C≡N (nitriles) | |||
| 1662.29 | C-0(carbonyl) |
FIGURE 1FT-IR spectra of Achilleamillefolium extract.
FIGURE 2FTIR spectra of herbal ethosomes.
FIGURE 3SEM micrograph of optimized herbal ethosomes.
FIGURE 4Response surface plots showing effect of lipid and ethanol on size.
Effects of variable on responses.
| Formulation code | Entrapment efficiency %±SD | Size (nm) | Polydispersity index ±SD | Zeta potential (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM1 | 58.17 ± 1.53 | 130 | 0.81 ± 0.050 | −37.9 |
| AM2 | 66.8 ± 1.14 | 115 | 0.93 ± 0.048 | −31.5 |
| AM3 | 73.95 ± 0.70 | 98 | 1.2 ± 0.042 | −38.6 |
| AM4 | 72.1 ± 1.97 | 240 | 0.6 ± 0.016 | −34.8 |
| AM5 | 81.45 ± 2 | 206 | 0.58 ± 0.052 | −35.3 |
| AM6 | 84.16 ± 1.82 | 182 | 0.42 ± 0.003 | −31.5 |
| AM7 | 86.12 ± 1.83 | 265 | 0.46 ± 0.013 | −23.2 |
| AM8 | 88.1 ± 1.30 | 258 | 0.48 ± 0.016 | −21.8 |
| AM9 | 90 ± 0.74 | 240 | 0.24 ± 0.017 | −31.1 |
The results are mean ± SD (n = 3), SD: Standard deviation.
FIGURE 5Size of optimized formulation.
FIGURE 6Zeta potential of AM.
FIGURE 7Response surface plots showing effect of lipid and ethanol on Zet potential.
FIGURE 9Response surface plots showing effect of lipid and ethanolon EE.
Organoleptic evaluation of topical gel at different temperature for 90 days.
| Parameter | Temp. (°C) | 0 h. | 24 h. | 7 days | 15 days | 30 days | 60 days | 90 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color | 4 | LY | LY | LY | LY | LY | LY | LY |
| 25 | LY | LY | LY | LY | LY | LY | LY | |
| 40 | LY | LY | Y | Y | Y | DY | DY | |
| — | ||||||||
| Odor | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Liquefaction | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Phase separation | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
LY = Light yellow; Y=Yellow; DY = Dark yellow; — = No change.
FIGURE 10pH of topical gel containing AM extract at different temperature.
FIGURE 12Viscosity of topical gel containing AM extract at different temperature.