| Literature DB >> 33911988 |
Iqbal Hussain1, Kanwal Rehman2, Muhammad Arslan Ashraf1, Rizwan Rasheed1, Javeria Gul1, Muhammad Sajid Hamid Akash3, Rohina Bashir1.
Abstract
Pharmaceutical wastes are environmental micro pollutant and potential risk for the ecosystem. Therefore, the present study was planned to find out the effects of different pharmaceutical effluent (PE) regimes on growth, secondary metabolism, and oxidative defense in 2 carrot lines. The seeds of 2 carrot lines (DC-3 and T-29) were spread in plastic pots containing sandy loam soil. The design of experiment was completely randomized with 3 replicates per treatment. At vegetative stage, plants were irrigated with 5 different doses (control), 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%) of PE on every 3-day interval, while control plants were irrigated with canal water. The carrot roots were harvested after 25 days' application of the treatments to determine various attributes. High concentration of PE caused a substantial decline in growth, beta carotenoids, anthocyanin, total soluble protein, free amino acids, total soluble sugar, phenolic and flavonoid contents and an increase in proline, levels of H2O2 and MDA, activities of antioxidant enzymes such as peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) in both lines. Moreover, PE caused significant reduction in the levels of essential nutrients (K+, Ca2+) and increased in Na+ content. However, T-29 line was found to be more PE tolerant because it had less H2O2, MDA and ascorbic acid contents. Thus, our findings showed that diluted PE (25%) could not be used for irrigation to increase the growth of plants in nutrients deprived environments without using bio filtration and biocarbon sorption technologies for treatments.Entities:
Keywords: H2O2; antioxidant enzymes; beta carotenoids; carrot; lipid peroxidation; pharmaceutical effluents; proline
Year: 2021 PMID: 33911988 PMCID: PMC8047843 DOI: 10.1177/1559325821998506
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dose Response ISSN: 1559-3258 Impact factor: 2.658
Mean Values of Physico-Chemical Parameters of PE.
| Parameters | Raw effluent | WHO standard | Parameters | Raw effluent | WHO standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 7.25 | 6.00-9.50 | COD | 115 | |
| Color | Light gray | Total sulphates (mg/L) | 387.80 | 500 | |
| Odor | Objectionable | Total nitrates (mg/L) | 41 | 50 | |
| EC (µS/cm) |
| TDS (mg/L) | 277 | <1200 | |
| TSS | 75 | Total cadmium (mg/L) | 0 .05 | 0.003 | |
| Total alkalinity (mg/L) | 45 | Total chloride (mg/L) | 72 | 250 | |
| Lead (mg/L) | 0.04 | 0.01 | Mn (mg/L) | 0.21 | |
| Iron (mg/L) | 0.35 | Phosphate (mg/L) | 0.18 | ||
| DO (mg/L) | 3. | Turbidity (ppm) | 55 | 5 | |
| BOD (mg/L) | 60 | Zinc (mg/L) | 2 .62 | 0.01 |
Figure 1.Effect of PE on growth attributes (root length, root fresh weight, root dry weight and root width) in 2 carrot lines (n = 3; means ± S.D).
Mean Square Values From ANOVA of Data for Growth, Biochemical Attributes, Oxidative Defense System, and Nutrient Contents in Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Grown Under Different PE Regimes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | 0.133 ns | 2.08 ns | 0.24*** | 0.341** | 21.89*** | 18.221*** | 430.506*** | 7.948*** | 0.335*** | 2867.93*** |
|
| 4 | 186.26*** | 841.93*** | 2.53*** | 2.316*** | 49.360*** | 5.919*** | 108.452*** | 5.566*** | 8.753*** | 4358.12*** |
|
| 4 | 3.34 ns | 12.28*** | 0.199*** | 0.102 ns | 2.659*** | 0.796*** | 5.941*** | 0.768*** | 1.955*** | 387.29*** |
|
| 20 | 1.739 | 2.057 | 0.023 | 0.058 | 0.0626 | 0.0135 | 0.458 | 0.0403 | 0.002 | 3.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | 0.0055*** | 12.1247*** | 145.196*** | 0.6338*** | 20867.7*** | 846.54*** | 1360* | 3.953** | 1.790** | 0.045*** |
|
| 4 | 0.111*** | 96.627*** | 122.738*** | 12.534*** | 9093.7*** | 2679.23*** | 201212*** | 4.650*** | 214.79* | 0.453*** |
|
| 4 | 0.0015*** | 0.964 ns | 44.438*** | 0.2962*** | 74.1** | 283.06*** | 3317*** | 0.438* | 15.624*** | 0.212*** |
|
| 20 | 0.00029 | 0.4444 | 1.605 | 0.0204 | 17.8 | 17.76 | 424 | 0.681 | 0.488 | 0.00051 |
Abbreviations: df = Degree of freedom; RL = Root length; RFW = Root fresh weight; RDW = Root dry weight; TSP = Total soluble protein; TFAA = Total free amino acids; TSS = Total soluble sugar; H2O2 = Hydrogen peroxide; MDA = Malondialdehyde; SOD = Superoxide dismutase; POD = Guaiacol peroxidase; CAT = catalase; Ca2+ = Calcium; K+ = Potassium; Na+ = Sodium.
***, **, *, significant at 0.001, 0.01 and 0.05 levels, respectively, ns = non-significant.
Figure 2.Effect of PE on biochemical attributes (total soluble protein, total free amino acids, free proline and total phenolic) in 2 carrot lines (n = 3; means ± S.D).
Figure 3.Effect of PE on biochemical attributes (anthocyanin, total soluble sugar and Beta carotenoids) in 2 carrot lines (n = 3; means ± S.D).
Figure 4.Effect of PE on biochemical attributes (H2O2, MDA and ascorbic acid contents) in 2 carrot lines (n = 3; means ± S.D).
Figure 5.Effect of PE on changes in nutrient contents (Ca2+, K+ and Na+) in 2 carrot lines (n = 3; means ± S.D).
Figure 6.Effect of PE on enzymatic antioxidant attributes (POD, SOD and CAT) in 2 carrot lines (n = 3; means ± S.D).