| Literature DB >> 33911946 |
Rimsha Zainab1, Ghulam Mujtaba Shah1, Waqar Khan2, Ayaz Mehmood3, Rashid Azad4, Khurram Shahzad5, Zahid Hussain Shah6, Fahad Alghabari7, Tariq Sultan8, Gyuhwa Chung9.
Abstract
The usage of novel Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) as bioinoculant is a good opportunity for ecological farming practices to improve soil condition, quality of grain, crops' yield and biodiversity conservation. The purpose of recent research was focused to examine, isolate and characterize PGP bacteria that colonize the rhizosphere for the duration of the maize plant's seedling. For this purpose, 14 samples of soils and roots in the maize rhizosphere were collected from rock phosphate area of Hazara, Pakistan. Forty morphologically natural bacterial colonies have been extracted and tested for their PGP innovations and biocontrol residences and further recognized as plant production advancing rhizobacteria. To find the effective PGPR strains with numerous activities, an aggregate of 150 bacterial colonies were sequestered from different rhizospheric soils of the Hazara Pakistan rock phosphate area. These tested bacterial strains were subjected to biochemical description and in vitro screening for their plant growth-promoting qualities like generation of indole acetic acid (IAA), alkali (NH3), hydrogen cyanide (HCN), siderophores, catalases, proteases and pectinases. All the isolates of rhizobacteria showed IAA producing capacity, as well as found positive for catalase and HCN. The above results suggested that, in addition to biocontrol marketers, PGPR could be used as biofertilizers to substitute agro-chemicals in order to increase crop production. These microorganisms can therefore be further developed and used for greenhouse and discipline packages.Entities:
Keywords: Ammonia; HCN; Indole Acetic-Acid (IAA); Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR); Siderophore
Year: 2021 PMID: 33911946 PMCID: PMC8071923 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Morphological characterization of isolated strains of MAIZE.
| 1 | RM7 | + | Coccus | Streptococcus | Circular | Flat | Red | Undulate |
| 2 | RM39 | + | Coccus | Streptococcus | Spindle | Flat | Off white | Entire |
| 3 | RM69 | + | Coccus | Streptococcus | Punctiform | Raised | Off white | Entire |
| 4 | RM34 | + | Coccobacillus | Streptococcus | Spindle | Flat | Off white | Entire |
| 5 | RM57 | + | Coccus | Streptococcus | Circular | Umbonate | Off white | Erose |
| 6 | RM38 | + | Coccobacillus | Streptococcus | Circular | Raised | Off white | Entire |
| 7 | RM4 | + | Coccus | Streptococcus | Punctiform | Flat | Peach | Erose |
| 8 | RM15 | + | Coccus | Monococcus | Punctiform | Umbonate | Off white | Entire |
| 9 | RM25 | – | Coccus | Streptococcus | Circular | Flat | White | Erose |
| 10 | RM10 | + | Coccus | Streptococcus | Spindle | Flat | Off white | Undulate |
| 11 | RM8 | + | Coccus | Streptococcus | Circular | Flat | Peach | Erose |
| 12 | RM64 | – | Coccus | Streptococcus | Spindle | Flat | Off white | Entire |
| 13 | RM59 | – | Coccobacillus | Streptococcus | Circular | Flat | Off white | Undulate |
| 14 | RM35 | – | Coccus | Monococcus | Rhizoid | Flat | Off white | Filamentous |
Biochemical characterization of isolated strains of MAIZE.
| RM7 | + | ++ | ++ | – | – | + | + | + | +++ | |
| RM39 | ++ | + | ++ | – | – | + | + | – | +++ | |
| RM69 | – | – | ++ | – | – | + | + | – | ++ | |
| RM34 | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | ++ | |
| RM57 | – | – | + | – | – | + | + | – | + | |
| RM38 | – | – | ++ | – | – | + | – | – | + | |
| RM4 | ++ | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | |
| RM15 | ++ | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | |
| RM25 | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | |
| RM10 | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | – | |
| RM8 | ++ | – | ++ | – | – | + | + | – | + | |
| RM64 | – | ++ | ++ | – | – | + | – | – | + | |
| RM59 | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | – | + | – | – | + | |
| RM35 | – | ++ | ++ | – | – | + | + | – | – |
Fig. 1Indole acetic acid production in LB broth containing L-tryptone.
Production and quantification of IAA in isolated bacterial strain.
| 1 | RM7 | ++++ | 84.113 |
| 2 | RM39 | +++ | 83.528 |
| 3 | RM69 | +++ | 68.799 |
| 4 | RM34 | + | 22.183 |
| 5 | RM57 | + | 20.887 |
| 6 | RM38 | + | 20.912 |
| 7 | RM4 | ++ | 33.786 |
| 8 | RM15 | ++ | 31.373 |
| 9 | RM25 | ++ | 27.854 |
| 10 | RM10 | + | 26.133 |
| 11 | RM8 | + | 23.92 |
| 12 | RM64 | + | 21.45 |
| 13 | RM59 | + | 14.525 |
| 14 | RM35 | + | 24.849 |
Fig. 4The effect of IAA with the application of bacterial strains.
Fig. 5HCN production with the application of bacterial stains.
Fig. 2Indole acetic acid production with the application of bacterial strains.
Fig. 3The effect of pH with the application of bacterial strains.
Fig. 6Amylase production with the application of bacterial stains.