Dear Editor:Lee et al.1 recently reported an interesting case entitled, “Unusual presentation of subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis by Alternaria alternate.”Phaeohyphomycosis is the general term used to describe infections due to dematiaceous or darkly pigmented fungi. This is histologic definition of a disease process that can be caused by many different organisms and can have multiple different clinical presentations2. Over 100 species and 60 genera of dematiaceous fungi have been implicated in human diseases. Bipolaris, Phialophora, Alternaria, and Exophiala are the fungi responsible for phaeohyphomycosis2. The distinguishing feature of these species is presence of melanin in Athe cell walls, which imparts the dark color to their conidia or spores and hyphae. In addition, the colonies are typically brown to black in color. The diagnosis of phaeohyphomycosis is confirmed by histopathological examination of clinical specimens and careful gross and microscopic examination of cultures3. In this case report, gross and microscopic findings of culture were not described. To diagnose phaeohyphomycosis by histological examination, it is necessary to identify the presence of melanin in the fungal wall. However, Fig. 2A, B do not show any pigmented hyphae or spores in Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained sections. In Fig. 2D, the presence of melanin pigment in the fungal wall is identified only by Fontana-Masson staining. The authors have stated, “A specific melanin stain such as Fontana-Masson can be used to identify the dark pigmented fungi accurately.” We would like to comment that use of Fontana-Masson melanin stain is not recommended to identify dematiaceous fungi1.The production of melanin is not unique to dematiaceous fungi. West et al.4 used Fontana-Masson stain in tissue sections of 132 cases of culture-proven mycoses to classify the staining patterns of common fungal pathogens. Many non-dematiaceous organisms, including Zygomycetes, Aspergillus, and Fusarium in addition to Cryptococcus, showed positive results. Interestingly, only 63% cases diagnosed with dematiaceous fungi stained positive with Fontana-Masson. The authors suggested that Fontana-Masson staining should not be relied upon as proof that an organism is dematiaceous. Elston5 stated, “Pigment can sometimes be inconspicuous in the hyphal wall. However, using Fontana-Masson melanin stain to identify lightly pigmented dematiaceous fungi is problematic, as some non-pigmented molds (including zygomycetes and dermatophytes) will stain.”Alternaria species (spp.) are well-known causative agents of phaeohyphomycosis. This case report may lead to the misunderstanding that phaeohyphomycosis can be diagnosed by the positive finding of Fontana-Masson staining. However, careful interpretation with H&E-stained sections is required to identify dematiaceous fungi to diagnose phaeohyphomycosis.