Literature DB >> 33911515

Prognostic Value of Leukocytosis in Systemic Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma with Cutaneous Involvement.

Youngkyoung Lim1, Ji-Hye Park1, Dong-Youn Lee1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 33911515      PMCID: PMC7992460          DOI: 10.5021/ad.2018.30.6.721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Dermatol        ISSN: 1013-9087            Impact factor:   1.444


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor: Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a T cell lymphoma expressing CD30. Cutaneous ALCL can be divided into two types: primary cutaneous ALCL (PC-ALCL) that first appears in the skin and cutaneous involvement of systemic ALCL (CIS-ALCL) that first develops in lymph nodes or other organs followed by skin invasion1. Depending on whether they express anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), systemic ALCLs can be divided into two groups (ALK+ALCL and ALK−ALCL). The prognosis of each group is very different2. Five-year survival rates of PC-ALCL, ALK+ALCL, and ALK−ALCL have been reported to be 90%, 70%~80%, and 30%~50%, respectively12. Previous studies have identified a variety of prognostic factors, including age, stage, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, and ALK expression in patients with systemic ALCL123. However, prognostic factors specific for patients with CIS-ALCL are currently unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze clinical features of CIS-ALCL and identify novel factors that could predict its prognosis. This preliminary study specifically determined the prognostic value of pretreatment white blood cell (WBC) counts. We retrospectively reviewed medical records and laboratory findings of patients diagnosed with CIS-ALCL confirmed by skin biopsy at the Dermatology Clinic of Samsung Medical Center (SMC) from January 1996 to April 2016. This study was approved by SMC Institutional Review Board (IRB no. 2016-10-042-002). We reviewed and analyzed their initial demographic information, clinical findings, and laboratory findings achieved before starting a new treatment after cutaneous lesions were histologically confirmed. Overall survival (OS) of CIS-ALCL patient was defined as the time from the confirmation of CISALCL by skin biopsy to death from any cause or last contact. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors associated with OS were identified by log rank test. All statistical analyses were executed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and R 3.3.1 (Vienna, Austria; http://www.R-project.org/). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Clinical findings of 12 CIS-ALCL patients were collected and analyzed (Table 1, 2), including 7 males and 5 females with mean age of 46.5 years (range, 22~83 years). Most patients visited the clinic early after developing skin lesions, with median duration of 1 month (range, 1~36 months). Two patients were unaware of the onset time of the skin lesion. Most (91.7%) patients had multiple skin lesions. Eight (66.7%) patients had extensive (involving several noncontiguous anatomical sites) distribution. Lower extremities were involved in 7 (58.3%) cases. B-symptoms were present in 4 (33.3%) patients. In laboratory findings, LDH was elevated in 6 (50%) cases. Three (25%) cases showed leukocytosis (reference: 3.5−10.5×103/mm3). Their range of WBC count was 14.86×103/mm3 to 35.6×103/mm3. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were elevated in 5 of 7 patients who had CRP data. Three cases were at stage I&II. The remaining 9 cases were at stage III&IV. In immunohistochemistry, ALK was positive in 2 out of 10 patients.
Table 1

Clinical findings of patients with cutaneous involvement of systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma

No.Sex/AgeDuration (mo)Presenting skin lesionsExtent of cutaneous involvementDistributionExtracutaneous findingsStagingALKB Sx.LDH ↑leukocytosisCRP ↑TreatmentOutcomeSkin Bx to outcome (mo)
1F/331NoduleS, LLELNIIA(+)(−)(+)(−)NACHOPAW12
2M/442NoduleM, LTMultiple visceral metastasesIVA(+)(−)(−)(−)(−)CHOP→Other CTx→ RT→SCTDWD7
3M/341PapuleM, LLELN, ENT lesion, Lung metastasisIIB(−)(+)(+)(−)NACHOP→Other CTx→ RT→Other CTxDWD9
4M/2236Nodule, ulcerM, EH&N, T, UE, LELNIVA(−)(−)(−)(−)NACHOP→Other CTx→RTAW55
5F/676Nodule, ulcer, swellingM, EH&N, UELN, ENT lesion, Lung metastasisIVB(−)(+)(−)(+)(+)CHOPDWD2
6M/611NoduleM, EH&N, TLN, ENT lesionIIIB(−)(+)(+)(+)(+)CHOP→Other CTx→ SCT→Other CTxDWD1
7M/57NANoduleM, LTLN, Lung metastasisIVA(−)(−)(+)(+)(+)Other CTxDWD3
8M/661NoduleM, EH&N, LELN, Multiple visceral metastases, BM involvementIVA(−)(−)(+)(−)(+)CHOP→RT→Other CTxDWD2
9F/351NoduleM, ET, UE, LELNIVA(−)(−)(−)(−)NACHOP→Other CTxAW84
10F/2917NoduleM, EH&N, UELN, MultipleIVB(−)(+)(+)(−)(+)CHOPDWD2
11M/271PapuleM, EH&N, LELN, Tongue massIIAND(−)(−)(−)NACHOP→RTAWD8
12M/83NANodule, ulcerM, EUE, LELNIVAND(−)(−)(−)(−)Symptomatic TxDWD8

mo: months, ALK: anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, B Sx.: B-symptoms, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase, CRP: C-reactive protein, Bx: biopsy, S: single, M: multiple, F: female, M: male, L: localized, E: extensive, LE: lower extremities, UE: upper extremities, T: trunk, H&N: head and neck, LN: lymph node involvement, ENT: ear, nose, and throat, BM: bone marrow, CHOP: cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, Other CTx: chemotherapy other than CHOP, RT: radiation therapy, SCT: stem cell transplantation, Tx: treatment, AW: alive and well, AWD: alive with disease, DWD: dead with disease, NA: not available.

Table 2

Survival outcome of patients with cutaneous involvement of systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma

Variables in CIS-ALCLNumber (%)Median OS after the confirmation of skin involvement (mo)p-value*1-year survival rate, %
MultiplicityMultiple11 (91.7)7.00.25424.2
Solitary1 (8.3)NENA
ExtentExtensive8 (66.7)5.00.88837.5
Localized4 (33.3)8.025.0
DistributionLE7 (58.3)NE0.00353.6
Non-LE5 (41.7)2.00.0
B-symptomsPositive4 (33.3)2.00.0540.0
Negative8 (66.7)8.050.0
LDH elevationPositive6 (50.0)2.50.21516.7
Negative6 (50.0)8.050.0
LeukocytosisPositive3 (25.0)2.00.0100.0
Negative9 (75.0)9.041.7
CRP elevationPositive5 (71.4)2.00.0320.0
Negative2 (28.6)7.50.0
StagingIII, IV9 (75.0)3.00.14422.2
I, II3 (25.0)9.050.0
ALK expressionPositive2 (20.0)7.00.43850.0
Negative8 (80.0)2.525.0

CIS-ALCL: cutaneous involvement of systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, OS: overall survival, mo: months, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase, CRP: C-reactive protein, ALK: anaplastic lymphoma kinase. NE: not estimable, NA: not available. *Significance was tested using the log rank test, †Statistically significant.

Leukocytosis predicted worse survival outcome (p=0.010). Median OS (MOS) was 9 months in patients without leukocytosis and 2 months in patients with leukocytosis. The 1-year survival rate (1YSR) was 41.7% in patients without leukocytosis and 0% in patients with leukocytosis. Cases without CRP elevation showed MOS of 7.5 months while cases with CRP elevation showed MOS of 2 months (p=0.032). In addition, patients with involvement of lower extremities showed better survival outcome than patients without involvement of lower extremities (p=0.003). Multiplicity, extent, B-symptoms, LDH elevation, staging, or ALK expression did not affect survival. Several studies have suggested that older age, high LDH level, poor performance status, B-symptoms, advanced stage, extranodal involvement, and the absence of ALK expression are unfavorable prognostic factors for systemic ALCL145. Similar to previous reports on systemic ALCL, the current study showed worse MOS and 1YSR in patients with B-symptoms, LDH elevation, advanced stage, and without ALK expression, although statistical significance was not shown. Interestingly, our analysis suggested predictive value of WBC count and CRP level. High WBC count has been reported to be a poor prognostic factor for other diseases such as Hodgkin's lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, cervical cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and breast cancer6. No previous study has confirmed the association between leukocytosis and the survival rate of CIS-ALCL patients. However, some studies have reported that cases of systemic ALCL with leukocytosis show poor clinical outcomes789. In a case series reported by Chang et al.7, the median value of WBC count was 22.7×103/mm3 (range: 15.3–112.9×103/mm3). Four of five patients died within 3.5 weeks7. The authors suggested that the release of cytokines such as G-CSF and tumor necrosis factor-α might be associated with leukocytosis of ALCL7. In another case report, ALCL cases showing extreme neutrophilia have been reported and prognostic value of interleukin-17 has been suggested10. Based on these case reports, the need to study the relationship between leukocytosis and prognosis of ALCL has increased. Although the current study suggested that WBC count might be a prognostic factor for clinical outcome, the number of patients used in this study with leukocytosis was small. This might have caused bias in results. The most important confounding factor to consider in the causal relation between leukocytosis and survival outcome is infection. Therefore, we reviewed the presence of evidence of infection when CIS-ALCL was identified in 12 cases. Results of serology and culture (including blood, urine, and wound swab) were negative in all cases except one which showed positivity for anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies. However, this case showed no elevation of WBC count. For the three cases showing leukocytosis, there was no evidence of infection. Therefore, the effect of infection was considered to be negligible in this study. In conclusion, results of this preliminary study suggested that elevation of WBC count might be a poor prognostic factor in CIS-ALCL patients. However, since our sample size was small, it was difficult to exclude the effect of unmeasured confounders or confirm statistical significance. Therefore, a multi-center study with a larger number of samples is needed to confirm our results in the near future.
  8 in total

1.  Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma with leukemoid reaction.

Authors:  Hazem E El-Osta; William J Salyers; William Palko; Margaret E Hagan; Boutros El-Haddad; Thomas K Schulz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ALK-positive.

Authors:  Andrés J M Ferreri; Silvia Govi; Stefano A Pileri; Kerry J Savage
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Anaplastic large cell lymphoma with paraneoplastic neutrophilia: an association between IL-17 elevation and aggressive disease progression.

Authors:  Yuki Sueki; Yumi Nozaki; Ichiro Kawashima; Takeo Yamamoto; Kei Nakajima; Toru Mitumori; Keita Kirito
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL): A comparative clinical feature and survival outcome analysis of 52 cases according to primary tumor site.

Authors:  Woo Jin Lee; Ik Jun Moon; Sang Hyung Lee; Chong Hyun Won; Sung Eun Chang; Jee Ho Choi; Kee Chan Moon; Chan-Sik Park; Jooryung Huh; Mi Woo Lee
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 5.  Anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ALK-negative.

Authors:  Andrés J M Ferreri; Silvia Govi; Stefano A Pileri; Kerry J Savage
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Anaplastic large cell lymphoma with paraneoplastic leukocytosis: a clinicopathological analysis of five cases.

Authors:  I-Wei Chang; Han-Ku Chen; Ming-Chun Ma; Wan-Ting Huang
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 7.  Primary cutaneous and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma: clinicopathologic aspects and therapeutic options.

Authors:  Christiane Querfeld; Irum Khan; Brett Mahon; Beverly P Nelson; Steven T Rosen; Andrew M Evens
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.990

8.  ALK- anaplastic large-cell lymphoma is clinically and immunophenotypically different from both ALK+ ALCL and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: report from the International Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Project.

Authors:  Kerry J Savage; Nancy Lee Harris; Julie M Vose; Fred Ullrich; Elaine S Jaffe; Joseph M Connors; Lisa Rimsza; Stefano A Pileri; Mukesh Chhanabhai; Randy D Gascoyne; James O Armitage; Dennis D Weisenburger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 22.113

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.