| Literature DB >> 33911388 |
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33911388 PMCID: PMC8061496 DOI: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_658_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Indian Acad Neurol ISSN: 0972-2327 Impact factor: 1.383
Figure 1Eyes in the nine cardinal positions of gaze. Panel A shows the left INO. Panel E shows the skew. LASD is more prominent in the adducting eye in panels G & I
Figure 2MRI images. Panel a and b showing the rostral left pons and linear left midline approaching left caudal mesencephalic infarcts. Panel C shows a top of the basilar occlusion
Figure 3Diagram showing the OTR at different levels of the brainstem. Note the ‘discordant’ TN from the medulla upto the INC. The TN becomes ‘concordant’ at the riMLF. Panel on the right; Diagram of the brainstem showing the various structures involved in vestibule-ocular pathways and areas of lesions
Different types of skew deviation
| Type | Incomitant Skew deviation | Comitant Skew deviation | Lateral alternating skew deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eye deviation with gaze direction | Skew hyperdeviation worsens on looking to one side | Skew deviation remains the same in all directions of gaze | Reversing hypertropia that is present in both lateral position of gaze. |
| Most commonly the abducting eye is higher, but sometimes the adducting eye is higher. | |||
| Pathway lesion | Asymmetric & Unilateral Partial injury to graviceptive pathway of either the ASCC or PSCC | Asymmetric Unilateral complete central graviceptive dysfunction affecting both ASCC and PSCC pathways | Bilateral Symmetric graviceptive pathway lesions anywhere from the medulla to the midbrain. |
ASCC; Anterior semicircular canals. PSCC; Posterior semicircular canals