Literature DB >> 33910870

Periprosthetic Fracture Resembling Atypical Femoral Fracture After Fixation With Retrograde Intramedullary Nail in Elderly Women: A Report of Two Cases.

Yojiro Takahashi1,2,3, Satoshi Hatashita1,2, Yumetaka Shinden1,2,3, Masayuki Ito1,2, Yoichi Kaneuchi3, Michiyuki Hakozaki4,5, Shinichi Konno3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The number of individuals diagnosed with and requiring medical treatment for osteoporosis continues to increase due to global population aging and the high awareness of osteoporosis. Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) including bisphosphonate and denosumab are widely used for osteoporosis, and atypical femoral fracture (AFF) is also gaining attention as a severe potential side effect of long-term BMA treatment. The definition of AFF excludes periprosthetic femoral fracture; here, we describe two cases of a periprosthetic femoral fracture that resembled AFF. CASE REPORT: The fractures occurred at the proximal tip of the retrograde femoral nail after an internal fixation for a distal femoral shaft fracture in elderly Japanese women. Each woman had been treated with bisphosphonate therapy for >2 years and had continued the bisphosphonate after undergoing surgery for a distal femoral shaft fracture. Each patient had noticed thigh pain before falling down, and plain radiographs showed a short oblique or transverse fracture with medial spike and localized periosteal reaction of the lateral cortex in each case. The fractures were re-fixed with an antegrade intramedullary nail, and bone union was achieved at >1 year after the second operation. Although these two cases were classified as periprosthetic fractures, they fulfilled the characteristics of AFF.
CONCLUSION: Physicians should conduct a thorough interview of patients with a history of BMA treatment in order to correctly diagnose periprosthetic fractures that resemble AFFs, and they should be aware that symptomatic fractures can be prevented by prophylactic fixation. The discontinuance of BMA therapy and the introduction of another drug such as teriparatide may lead to faster healing of surgically treated AFFs. Copyright
© 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atypical femoral fracture; bone-modifying agent; elderly patient; periprosthetic fracture; retrograde intramedullary nail

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33910870      PMCID: PMC8193328          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  10 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging findings in the hyperacute phase of atypical femoral fracture: a case description.

Authors:  Kazuki Kobayashi; Yoichi Kaneuchi; Michiyuki Hakozaki; Koji Otani; Shinichi Konno
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-12

2.  Severely suppressed bone turnover: a potential complication of alendronate therapy.

Authors:  Clarita V Odvina; Joseph E Zerwekh; D Sudhaker Rao; Naim Maalouf; Frank A Gottschalk; Charles Y C Pak
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Atypical femoral fractures related to bisphosphonate treatment: issues and controversies related to their surgical management.

Authors:  A Koh; E Guerado; P V Giannoudis
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Stress fracture of the bowed femoral shaft is another cause of atypical femoral fracture in elderly Japanese: a case series.

Authors:  Yoto Oh; Yoshiaki Wakabayashi; Yoshiro Kurosa; Masafumi Ishizuki; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 1.601

5.  Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors:  Elizabeth Shane; David Burr; Peter R Ebeling; Bo Abrahamsen; Robert A Adler; Thomas D Brown; Angela M Cheung; Felicia Cosman; Jeffrey R Curtis; Richard Dell; David Dempster; Thomas A Einhorn; Harry K Genant; Piet Geusens; Klaus Klaushofer; Kenneth Koval; Joseph M Lane; Fergus McKiernan; Ross McKinney; Alvin Ng; Jeri Nieves; Regis O'Keefe; Socrates Papapoulos; Howe Tet Sen; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Robert S Weinstein; Michael Whyte
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Prospective comparison of retrograde and antegrade femoral intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  R F Ostrum; A Agarwal; R Lakatos; A Poka
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Retrograde intramedullary nailing, without reaming, of fractures of the femoral shaft in multiply injured patients.

Authors:  B R Moed; J T Watson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Rare non-traumatic periprosthetic femoral fracture with features of an atypical femoral fracture: a case report.

Authors:  Takahiro Niikura; Sang Yang Lee; Yoshitada Sakai; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2015-05-06

9.  A Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture with Characteristics of Atypical Femoral Fracture.

Authors:  Shuya Tanaka; Tomoaki Fukui; Keisuke Oe; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Takehiko Matsushita; Shinya Hayashi; Teruya Kawamoto; Ryosuke Kuroda; Takahiro Niikura
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2019-07-16

10.  Medical Management of Patients After Atypical Femur Fractures: a Systematic Review and Recommendations From the European Calcified Tissue Society.

Authors:  Denise M van de Laarschot; Malachi J McKenna; Bo Abrahamsen; Bente Langdahl; Martine Cohen-Solal; Núria Guañabens; Richard Eastell; Stuart H Ralston; M Carola Zillikens
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 5.958

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.