A Smith1, J Hewitt2, T J Quinn3, M Robling4. 1. Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Smithan1@cardiff.ac.uk. 2. Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. 3. Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. 4. Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the use of routine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to influence the care of individual patients with stroke. However, there are significant gaps in our understanding as to how PROMs influence post-stroke patient care and clinical practice. This is due to factors including the number of purported uses for PROMs and that PROMs are complex interventions, which attempt to stimulate varied actions or behaviours. Therefore, the objective of this realist synthesis is to offer theory-based explanations as to how PROMs influence post-stroke clinical practice and patient care. METHODS: This is a protocol for a realist synthesis, which involves three distinct phases: theory building (phase 1), theory testing and refinement (phase 2) and synthesis (phase 3). Phase 1 will develop initial rough programme theories (IRPTs), through literature searches (from January 2000 onwards) of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and the grey literature. Only secondary sources will be included that contribute to the development of IRPTs. Only two IRPTs, prioritised by the stakeholder group, will be taken forward to be tested and refined during phase 2. Further novel searches will be employed in phase 2, utilising the same criteria as phase 1; however, phase 2 searches will not utilise grey literature searches, and only primary research studies that contribute to the refinement of programme theories under investigation will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen and select all returned results. The reviewers will code and annotate relevant sources, resulting in 'fragments' to be extracted and graded based on the richness of their contribution to explanation and causal insight. Further, these fragments will be organised into 'Context-Mechanism-Outcome' configurations. Phase 3 of the review will involve the synthesis of context-mechanism-outcome configurations to form middle-range theory-based explanations and developed logic models for stakeholders to understand how PROMs in post-stroke clinical practice and patient care work for whom, how and under what circumstances. DISCUSSION: The resulting realist synthesis will provide guidance on the implementation of PROMs within routine post-stroke clinical practice and patient care and act as a touchstone for further testing and refinement of PROMs programmes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020138649 .
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the use of routine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to influence the care of individual patients with stroke. However, there are significant gaps in our understanding as to how PROMs influence post-strokepatient care and clinical practice. This is due to factors including the number of purported uses for PROMs and that PROMs are complex interventions, which attempt to stimulate varied actions or behaviours. Therefore, the objective of this realist synthesis is to offer theory-based explanations as to how PROMs influence post-stroke clinical practice and patient care. METHODS: This is a protocol for a realist synthesis, which involves three distinct phases: theory building (phase 1), theory testing and refinement (phase 2) and synthesis (phase 3). Phase 1 will develop initial rough programme theories (IRPTs), through literature searches (from January 2000 onwards) of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and the grey literature. Only secondary sources will be included that contribute to the development of IRPTs. Only two IRPTs, prioritised by the stakeholder group, will be taken forward to be tested and refined during phase 2. Further novel searches will be employed in phase 2, utilising the same criteria as phase 1; however, phase 2 searches will not utilise grey literature searches, and only primary research studies that contribute to the refinement of programme theories under investigation will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen and select all returned results. The reviewers will code and annotate relevant sources, resulting in 'fragments' to be extracted and graded based on the richness of their contribution to explanation and causal insight. Further, these fragments will be organised into 'Context-Mechanism-Outcome' configurations. Phase 3 of the review will involve the synthesis of context-mechanism-outcome configurations to form middle-range theory-based explanations and developed logic models for stakeholders to understand how PROMs in post-stroke clinical practice and patient care work for whom, how and under what circumstances. DISCUSSION: The resulting realist synthesis will provide guidance on the implementation of PROMs within routine post-stroke clinical practice and patient care and act as a touchstone for further testing and refinement of PROMs programmes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020138649 .
Authors: Rafaella Queiroga Souto; Vladimir Khanassov; Quan Nha Hong; Paula L Bush; Isabelle Vedel; Pierre Pluye Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Ethan Basch; John Spertus; R Adams Dudley; Albert Wu; Cynthia Chuahan; Perry Cohen; Mary Lou Smith; Nick Black; Amaris Crawford; Keri Christensen; Kathleen Blake; Christine Goertz Journal: Value Health Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Karen M Barclay-Moss; Natasha A Lannin; Brenda Grabsch; Monique Kilkenny; Dominique A Cadilhac Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Larissa Shamseer; David Moher; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; Alessandro Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-01-02
Authors: Helen Rodgers; Denise Howel; Nawaraj Bhattarai; Robin Cant; Avril Drummond; Gary A Ford; Anne Forster; Richard Francis; Katie Hills; Anne-Marie Laverty; Christopher McKevitt; Peter McMeekin; Christopher I M Price; Elaine Stamp; Eleanor Stevens; Luke Vale; Lisa Shaw Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Joanne Greenhalgh; Ray Pawson; Judy Wright; Nick Black; Jose Maria Valderas; David Meads; Elizabeth Gibbons; Laurence Wood; Charlotte Wood; Chris Mills; Sonia Dalkin Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sheila Cristina Ouriques Martins; Wyllians Vendramini Borelli; Thais Leite Secchi; Gabriel Paulo Mantovani; Arthur Pille; Daissy Liliana Mora Cuervo; Leonardo Augusto Carbonera; Ana Claudia de Souza; Magda Carla Ouriques Martins; Rosane Brondani; Andrea Garcia de Almeida; Angélica Dal Pizzol; Franciele Pereira Dos Santos; Ana Claudia Alves; Nathalia Soares Meier; Guilherme Pamplona Bueno Andrade; Pedro Angst Maciel; Alexandre Weber; Gustavo Dariva Machado; Mohamed Parrini; Luiz Antonio Nasi Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 4.086