Literature DB >> 33910562

The role of transcriptomic biomarkers of endometrial receptivity in personalized embryo transfer for patients with repeated implantation failure.

Aihua He1,2, Yangyun Zou3, Cheng Wan3, Jing Zhao1,2, Qiong Zhang1,2, Zhongyuan Yao1,2, Fen Tian1,2, Hong Wu4,5, Xi Huang1,2, Jing Fu1,2, Chunxu Hu3, Yue Sun3, Lan Xiao1,2, Tianli Yang1,2, Zhaojuan Hou1,2, Xin Dong3, Sijia Lu6, Yanping Li7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Window of implantation (WOI) displacement is one of the endometrial origins of embryo implantation failure, especially repeated implantation failure (RIF). An accurate prediction tool for endometrial receptivity (ER) is extraordinarily needed to precisely guide successful embryo implantation. We aimed to establish an RNA-Seq-based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) tool using transcriptomic biomarkers and to evaluate the benefit of personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by this tool in patients with RIF.
METHODS: This was a two-phase strategy comprising tool establishment with retrospective data and benefit evaluation with a prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial. In the first phase, rsERT was established by sequencing and analyzing the RNA of endometrial tissues from 50 IVF patients with normal WOI timing. In the second phase, 142 patients with RIF were recruited and grouped by patient self-selection (experimental group, n = 56; control group, n = 86). pET guided by rsERT was performed in the experimental group and conventional ET in the control group.
RESULTS: The rsERT, comprising 175 biomarker genes, showed an average accuracy of 98.4% by using tenfold cross-validation. The intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR) of the experimental group (50.0%) was significantly improved compared to that (23.7%) of the control group (RR, 2.107; 95% CI 1.159 to 3.830; P = 0.017) when transferring day-3 embryos. Although not significantly different, the IPR of the experimental group (63.6%) was still 20 percentage points higher than that (40.7%) of the control group (RR, 1.562; 95% CI 0.898 to 2.718; P = 0.111) when transferring blastocysts.
CONCLUSIONS: The rsERT was developed to accurately predict the WOI period and significantly improve the pregnancy outcomes of patients with RIF, indicating the clinical potential of rsERT-guided pET. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-DDD-17013375. Registered 14 November 2017, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Endometrial receptivity; Personalized embryo transfer; RNA-Seq; Repeated implantation failure; Window of implantation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33910562     DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-02837-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Transl Med        ISSN: 1479-5876            Impact factor:   5.531


  43 in total

Review 1.  Implantation and the survival of early pregnancy.

Authors:  E R Norwitz; D J Schust; S J Fisher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Assessment of endometrial receptivity.

Authors:  Bruce A Lessey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  The window for embryo transfer in oocyte donation cycles depends on the duration of progesterone therapy.

Authors:  Y Prapas; N Prapas; E E Jones; A J Duleba; D L Olive; A Chatziparasidou; G Vlassis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  ART and uterine pathology: how relevant is the maternal side for implantation?

Authors:  Daniela Galliano; José Bellver; César Díaz-García; Carlos Simón; Antonio Pellicer
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 5.  What exactly do we mean by 'recurrent implantation failure'? A systematic review and opinion.

Authors:  Lukasz T Polanski; Miriam N Baumgarten; Siobhan Quenby; Jan Brosens; Bruce K Campbell; Nicholas J Raine-Fenning
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 6.  What is the contribution of embryo-endometrial asynchrony to implantation failure?

Authors:  Wan-Tinn Teh; John McBain; Peter Rogers
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Uterine receptivity for nidation.

Authors:  A Psychoyos
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy.

Authors:  A J Wilcox; D D Baird; C R Weinberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The impact of embryonic development and endometrial maturity on the timing of implantation.

Authors:  P A Bergh; D Navot
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  15 years of transcriptomic analysis on endometrial receptivity: what have we learnt?

Authors:  Soumaya Messaoudi; Imane El Kasmi; Amelie Bourdiec; Kimberley Crespo; Laurence Bissonnette; Cecile Le Saint; François Bissonnette; Isaac-Jacques Kadoch
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2019-08-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  The clinical efficiency of transcriptome-based endometrial receptivity assessment (Tb-ERA) in Chinese patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF): A study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wen-Bi Zhang; He Li; Xiang Lu; Jun-Ling Chen; Lu Li; Jiu-Cheng Chen; Han Wu; Xiao-Xi Sun
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-05-28

2.  The Clinical Efficacy of Personalized Embryo Transfer Guided by the Endometrial Receptivity Array/Analysis on IVF/ICSI Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhenteng Liu; Xuemei Liu; Meimei Wang; Huishan Zhao; Shunzhi He; Shoucui Lai; Qinglan Qu; Xinrong Wang; Dongmei Zhao; Hongchu Bao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Integrated Analysis of Multiple Microarrays Based on Raw Data Identified Novel Gene Signatures in Recurrent Implantation Failure.

Authors:  Hong Zeng; Yu Fu; Lang Shen; Song Quan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  Factors Affecting Artificial Insemination Pregnancy Outcome.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Yue Zhang; Hong-Liang Sun; Li-Ting Wang; Xue-Feng Li; Fei Wang; Yan-Lin Wang; Qing-Chun Li
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-07-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.